journal article·2012-04

Phase-field model with finite interface dissipation: Extension to multi-component multi-phase alloys

Lijun Zhang, Ingo Steinbach

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A previously developed phase-field model with finite interface dissipation for binary dual-phase alloys out of chemical equilibrium is generalized to a multi-component multi-phase model in the framework of the multi-phase-field formalism, allowing the description of multiple junctions with an arbitrary number of phases and components. In multiple junctions, each phase concentration is assigned to a dynamic equation to account for finite interface dissipation, and its formulation is proposed in two different models. The overall mass conservation between the phases of a multiple junction is used in model I, whereas the concentrations of each pair of phases have to be conserved during the transformations for model II. Both models demonstrate the decomposition of the nonlinear interactions between different phases into pairwise interaction of phases in multiple junctions. They converge to the same equilibrium state while in non-equilibrium states different predictions are given.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Boettinger · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
2. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
3. Moelans · CALPHAD · 2008 · 32 · 26810.1016/j.calphad.2007.11.003 ↗
4. Steinbach · Mod Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
5. Wang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 121210.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.041 ↗
6. Tiaden · Physica D · 1998 · 115 · 7310.1016/S0167-2789(97)00226-1 ↗
7. Karma · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 87 · 11570110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115701 ↗
8. Kim · Phys Rev E · 1999 · 60 · 718610.1103/PhysRevE.60.7186 ↗
9. Eiken · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 73 · 06612210.1103/PhysRevE.73.066122 ↗
10. Steinbach · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 268910.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.035 ↗
11. Wheeler · Phys Rev E · 1993 · 47 · 189310.1103/PhysRevE.47.1893 ↗
12. Danilov · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 465910.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.045 ↗
13. Steinbach · Physica D · 1999 · 134 · 38510.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
14. Steinbach · Physica D · 1996 · 94 · 13510.1016/0167-2789(95)00298-7 ↗
15. Andersson · CALPHAD · 2002 · 26 · 27310.1016/S0364-5916(02)00037-8 ↗
16. Du · CALPHAD · 2011 · 35 · 42710.1016/j.calphad.2011.06.007 ↗
17. Andersson · J Appl Phys · 1992 · 72 · 135010.1063/1.351745 ↗
18. Borgenstam · J Phase Equilib · 2000 · 21 · 26910.1361/105497100770340057 ↗
19. Liu · CALPHAD · 2009 · 33 · 61410.1016/j.calphad.2009.07.002 ↗
20. Zhang · Int J Mater Res · 2010 · 101 · 146110.3139/146.110428 ↗
21. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 366410.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.002 ↗
22. Steinbach · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 496510.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.009 ↗
23. Lebedev · Int J Mater Res · 2010 · 101 · 47310.3139/146.110297 ↗