journal article·2003-10

A comparison of the phenomenological theory of martensitic transformations with a model based on interfacial defects

R.C. Pond, S. Celotto, J.P. Hirth

Acta Materialia· Volume 51· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Structural models of martensitic interfaces are those where the habit plane (HP) is comprised of coherent terraces reticulated by arrays of interfacial defects. Such interfaces are shown explicitly to exhibit no long-range displacements and to move in a glissile manner by lateral motion of disconnections along the interface. We quantify predictions of HP and orientation relationship (OR) between the parent and product crystals for such models in terms of a reference lattice in an approach called a topological model (TM). These crystallographic quantities for the TM are compared with those of the phenomenological theory of martensite crystallography (PTMC). For the case of transformations resembling α to β in Ti, but where lattice invariant deformation is suppressed, the two models agree when the interplanar spacings of the terraces in the two crystals are the same. However, although the OR’s according to the two approaches are very similar, the predicted HP’s differ systematically when the terrace plane spacings are varied. The differences arise because the PTMC interfaces are unrelaxed configurations that are invariant planes of the geometrical shape transformation, whereas TM interfaces are physically invariant planes as a transformation progresses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Christian · 2002
2. Wechsler · Trans AIME · 1953 · 197 · 1503
3. Bowles · Acta Metall · 1954 · 2 · 12910.1016/0001-6160(54)90102-9 ↗
4. Wayman · 1968 · 1507
5. Bilby · Phil Mag · 1953 · 44 · 78210.1080/14786440708521056 ↗
6. Smith · Scripta Metall · 1987 · 21 · 100910.1016/0036-9748(87)90240-7 ↗
7. Hall · Surface Sci · 1972 · 31 · 25710.1016/0039-6028(72)90264-6 ↗
8. Dahmen · Scripta Metall · 1987 · 21 · 102910.1016/0036-9748(87)90244-4 ↗
9. Mahon · Phil Mag A · 1953 · 44 · 78210.1080/14786440708521056 ↗
10. Forwood · 1991
11. Chen · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 182710.1016/0001-6160(85)90006-9 ↗
12. Kajiwara S. J. de Pysique Colloque 2003, in press.
13. Olson · Metall Trans · 1976 · 7A · 1897
14. Wayman · 1964
15. Mackenzie · Acta Metall · 1957 · 5 · 13710.1016/0001-6160(57)90018-4 ↗
16. Howe · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 234310.1016/0956-7151(92)90153-6 ↗
17. Hirth · J Phys Chem Sol · 1994 · 55 · 98510.1016/0022-3697(94)90118-X ↗
18. Aaronson · Metall Trans · 1994 · 25A · 179710.1007/BF02649030 ↗
19. Christian · Met Mat Trans A · 1994 · 25A · 182110.1007/BF02649031 ↗
20. Muddle · Metall Mater Trans · 1994 · 25A · 1821
21. Hirth · Acta Metall Mater · 1996 · 44 · 474910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00132-2 ↗
22. Pond · Solid State Phys · 1994 · 287 · 28710.1016/S0081-1947(08)60641-4 ↗
23. Pond RC, Celotto S. Int Mater Rev 2003;48(4):1–21.10.1179/095066003225010245 ↗
24. Bywater · Phil Mag · 1972 · 25 · 124910.1080/14786437208223852 ↗
25. Klenov D. PhD thesis. University of Birmingham, 2002.
26. Hammond · Acta Metall · 1969 · 17 · 86910.1016/0001-6160(69)90107-2 ↗
27. Burgers · Physica · 1934 · 1 · 56110.1016/S0031-8914(34)80244-3 ↗
28. Hirth · J Appl Phys · 1986 · 60 · 237210.1063/1.337148 ↗
29. Sleeswyk · Acta Metall · 1962 · 10 · 70510.1016/0001-6160(62)90040-8 ↗
30. Hirth · Met Mat Trans A · 1994 · 25A · 188510.1007/BF02649036 ↗
31. Bollmann · 1970
32. Frank · Acta Metall · 1953 · 1 · 1510.1016/0001-6160(53)90005-4 ↗
33. Suzuki · Sci Rep Tohoku Univ · 1954 · 6A · 30
34. Dregia · J. Appl Phys · 1991 · 69 · 216910.1063/1.348745 ↗
35. Frank · Proc Roy Soc London · 1949 · 198A · 20510.1098/rspa.1949.0095 ↗
36. Hirth · 1968 · 705