journal article·2011-02

Atomic-scale simulation of screw dislocation/coherent twin boundary interaction in Al, Au, Cu and Ni

M. Chassagne, M. Legros, D. Rodney

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The influence of material and choice of interatomic potential on the interaction between an a /2〈1 1 0〉{1 1 1} screw dislocation and a Σ3{1 1 1}〈1 1 0〉 coherent twin boundary (CTB) is determined by simulating this process in a range of face-centered cubic metals modeled with a total of 10 embedded-atom method (EAM) potentials. Generalized stacking fault energies are computed, showing a linear relation between the stacking faut ( γ S ) and twin energies, as well as between the unstable stacking fault ( γ US ) and unstable twinning ( γ UT ) energies. We show that the reaction mechanism (absorption of the dislocation into the CTB or transmission into the twinned region) and reaction stress depend strongly on the potential used, even for a given material and are controlled by the material parameter γ S / μb P (where μ is the shear modulus and b P the Shockley partial Burgers vector), rather than the sign of the ratio ( γ US − γ S )/( γ UT − γ S ), as proposed recently by Jin et al. [1] . Moreover, there exists a critical reaction stress, close to 400 MPa, independent of the potential, below which the dislocation is absorbed in the CTB and above which the dislocation is transmitted into the twinned region. The simulations are discussed with respect to in situ transmission electron microscopy straining experiments in Cu that highlight the importance of thermally activated cross-slip in the interaction process and show that transmission across a twin boundary is possible but is most likely an indirect process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Semiconductor materials and interfaces

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Jin · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 116310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.072 ↗
2. Sleeswyk · Acta Metall · 1961 · 9 · 91710.1016/0001-6160(61)90110-9 ↗
3. Mahajan · Acta Metall · 1973 · 21 · 17310.1016/0001-6160(73)90059-X ↗
4. Rémy · Metall Trans · 1981 · 12A · 38710.1007/BF02648536 ↗
5. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
6. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
7. Shen · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 98910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.033 ↗
8. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 109610.1063/1.1647690 ↗
9. Zhu · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2007 · 104 · 303110.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
10. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 21210410.1103/PhysRevB.75.212104 ↗
11. Jin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 112610.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.020 ↗
12. Buehler · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 12 · S39110.1088/0965-0393/12/4/S07 ↗
13. Zheng · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 50810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.039 ↗
14. Li · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 07544410.1103/PhysRevB.79.075444 ↗
15. Shabib · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 05500910.1088/0965-0393/17/5/055009 ↗
16. Shabib · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 436410.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.028 ↗
17. Wu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 450810.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.015 ↗
18. Li · Nature · 2010 · 464 · 87710.1038/nature08929 ↗
19. Dewald · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 461510.1080/14786430701297590 ↗
20. Escaig · J Phys (Paris) · 1968 · 29 · 22510.1051/jphys:01968002902-3022500 ↗
21. Shen · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 394110.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.026 ↗
22. Shen · J Mech Phys Solids · 2007 · 55 · 95610.1016/j.jmps.2006.11.005 ↗
23. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
24. Tadmor · J Mech Phys Solids · 2003 · 51 · 76510.1016/S0022-5096(03)00005-X ↗
25. Fleischer · Acta Metall · 1959 · 7 · 13410.1016/0001-6160(59)90122-1 ↗
26. Afanasyev · Nano Lett · 2007 · 7 · 205610.1021/nl070959l ↗
27. Deng · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 151710.1021/nl803553b ↗
28. Cao · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 15190910.1063/1.2721367 ↗
29. Deng · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 609010.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.035 ↗
30. Ercolessi · Europhys Lett · 1994 · 26 · 58310.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 ↗
31. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
32. Grochola · J Chem Phys · 2005 · 123 · 20471910.1063/1.2124667 ↗
33. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
34. Mendelev · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 102 · 04350110.1063/1.2769157 ↗
35. Ackland · Philos Mag A · 1987 · 56 · 73510.1080/01418618708204485 ↗
36. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
37. Angelo · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 1995 · 3 · 28910.1088/0965-0393/3/3/001 ↗
38. Chen · J Mater Res · 1989 · 4 · 6210.1557/JMR.1989.0062 ↗
39. Zimmerman · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2000 · 8 · 10310.1088/0965-0393/8/2/302 ↗
40. Rodney · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 60710.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.044 ↗
41. Dislocation-obstacle interactions at the atomic level
42. Rodney · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 14410810.1103/PhysRevB.76.144108 ↗
43. Mahajan · Philos Mag · 1970 · 21 · 4310.1080/14786437008238395 ↗
44. Hirth · 1982