Spherical indentation response of metallic glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
Metallic glasses exhibit high hardness values, typified by a plastic constraint factor (the ratio of hardness to compressive yield strength) that is considerably larger than that seen in ductile crystalline metals. The reason for this behaviour is investigated in this paper, by conducting a combined experimental and numerical study on the spherical indentation response of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass (Vitreloy-1). An extended Drucker–Prager constitutive theory with different levels of pressure sensitivity is employed in the numerical simulations. In addition, a modified version of the expanding cavity model, which incorporates pressure sensitivity of yielding, is used to interpret the trends exhibited by the experimental and computational results. Attention is focused on the development of plastic flow beneath the indenter as well as the variation of hardness with indentation strain. It is shown that the high plastic constraint factor exhibited by metallic glasses at large indentation strains is an outcome of their pressure sensitive plastic deformation. These observations are discussed in the context of an appropriate constitutive model for yielding of metallic glasses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Johnson · MRS Bull. · 1999 · 24 · 4210.1557/S0883769400053252 ↗
2. Bruck · Scripta Metall. · 1994 · 30 · 42910.1016/0956-716X(94)90598-3 ↗
3. Lewandowski · Philos. Mag. A · 2002 · 82 · 324710.1080/01418610208240453 ↗
4. Spaepen · Acta Mater. · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
5. Leamy · Metall. Trans. · 1972 · 3 · 69910.1007/BF02642754 ↗
6. Donovan · Acta Metall. · 1989 · 37 · 44510.1016/0001-6160(89)90228-9 ↗
7. Vaidyanathan · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 378110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00263-4 ↗
8. Kimura · 1983 · 187
9. Flores · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 252710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00125-2 ↗
10. Schuh · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 44910.1038/nmat918 ↗
11. Lu · J. Mater. Res. · 2003 · 18 · 203910.1557/JMR.2003.0287 ↗
12. Sargent · Scripta Mater. · 1982 · 16 · 120710.1016/0036-9748(82)90468-9 ↗
13. Schuh · J. Mater Res. · 2004 · 19 · 4610.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.46 ↗
14. Jana S, Bhowmick R, Kawamura Y, Chattopadhyay K, Ramamurty U, Intermetallics (in press)
15. Ramamurty U, Jana S, Kawamura Y, Chattopadhyay K, 2003 (unpublished results)
16. Tabor · 1951
17. Narasimhan · Mech. Mater · 2004 · 36 · 63310.1016/S0167-6636(03)00075-9 ↗
18. Johnson · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 1970 · 18 · 11510.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
19. Giannakopoulos · Mech. Mater. · 1997 · 25 · 110.1016/S0167-6636(96)00051-8 ↗
20. ABAQUS/Standard, Theory Manual. Hibbit Karlsson and Sorenson Inc., RI; 1996
21. Oliver · J. Mater. Res. · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
22. Kachanov · 1974
23. Belytshko · 2000
24. Wriggers · Comput. Struct. · 1990 · 37 · 31910.1016/0045-7949(90)90324-U ↗
25. Johnson · 1985
26. Fisher-Cripps · 2000
27. Sinclair · Int. J. Solids Struct. · 1985 · 21 · 86510.1016/0020-7683(85)90039-3 ↗
28. Chadwick · Quart. J. Appl. Math. · 1959 · 12 · 5210.1093/qjmam/12.1.52 ↗
29. Wright · Mater. Trans. JIM · 2001 · 42 · 64210.2320/matertrans.42.642 ↗
30. Bowden · J. Mater. Sci. · 1972 · 7 · 5210.1007/BF00549550 ↗
31. Chen · 1988
32. Sokolovski · 1960
33. Kramer · Acta Mater. · 1999 · 47 · 33310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00301-2 ↗
34. Marsh · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1964 · 279 · 42010.1098/rspa.1964.0114 ↗