On the use of energy methods for interpretation of results of single-fiber fragmentation experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract _We consider fragmentation experiments as a set of experimental results for fiber break density as a function of applied strain. This paper explores the potential for using fracture mechanics or energy methods in interpreting fragmentation experiments. We found that energy does not control fiber fracture; instead, fiber fracture releases much more energy than required to fracture the fiber. The excess released energy can lead to other damage mechanisms such as interfacial debonding. By assuming that all the excess released energy causes interfacial debonding and balancing energy using the energy release rate for debonding, we were able to determine interfacial toughness from fragmentation experiments. A reliable determination of interfacial toughness requires prior knowledge of interphase stress-transfer properties, fiber failure properties, actual damage mechanisms, and the coefficient of friction at the interface. Keywords: Fragmentation teststress transferenergy release ratedebondinginterface toughness
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
a Material Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
b Material Science and Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Wadsworth N. J. · Br. J. Appl. Phys. (J. Phys. D.) · 1968 · 1 · 104910.1088/0022-3727/1/8/312 ↗
2. Fraser , A. A. Ancker , F. H. and DiBenedetto , A. T. 1975.Proc. 30th Conf. SPI Reinforced Plastics Div1–13. Section 22-A
3. 10.1080/0021846830807490110.1080/00218468308074901 ↗
4. 10.1080/0021846860807122510.1080/00218468608071225 ↗
5. 10.1080/0021846910802650710.1080/00218469108026507 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0036759010.1007/BF00367590 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00065-010.1016/S0020-7683(96)00065-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/0167-6636(90)90051-G10.1016/0167-6636(90)90051-G ↗
9. Hashin , Z. 1990.Inelastic Deformation of Composite Materials, Edited by: Dvorak , G. J. 3–34. New York: Springer- Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4613-9109-8_1 ↗
10. 10.1016/0266-3538(93)90050-Q10.1016/0266-3538(93)90050-Q ↗
11. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90148-110.1016/0266-3538(94)90148-1 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0056925310.1007/BF00569253 ↗
13. Liu , C. H. and Nairn , J. A. 1996. Unpublished results
14. Nairn J. A. · J. Mat. Sci. · 1993 · 28 · 509910.1007/BF00361186 ↗
15. Nairn , J. A. and Hu , S. 1994.Damage Mechanics of Composite Materials, Edited by: Ramesh , Talreja . 187–243. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Naim , J. A.Proc. 8th Int'l Conf. on Comp. MatVol. I, 423–430. Whistler, BC, Canada
17. 10.1016/0266-3538(94)90033-710.1016/0266-3538(94)90033-7 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0036336210.1007/BF00363362 ↗
19. Liu , Y. C. and Nairn , J. A. 1996. Unpublished results
20. Lekhnitski S. G. · 1981