journal article·2024-07-02

An embedded machine learning strategy for analyzing interfacial characteristics in impact welding of dissimilar alloys

Arif Sari, Candra Zonyfar, Shavan Askar, Sherzod Abdullaev, Raaid Alubady, M. K. Sharma

Composite Interfaces· Volume 31· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, a novel embedded machine learning (ML) framework was employed to analyze interfacial characteristics in dissimilar-alloy impact welding. While keeping the substrates constant, i.e., stainless steel and Ti alloy, the influence of interlayer types on the resultant morphology of impact-welded bonds was also highlighted. The dataset was meticulously generated through numerical simulations, utilizing materials properties and processing parameters as primary inputs. These inputs were used to predict various interfacial features, including the extent of wave formation (L), specific welding zone area (S), average waveform amplitude (A), and maximum interface temperature (Tmax). Impressively, exceptional predictive capabilities were demonstrated by the ML model, with determination coefficients of 0.938, 0.924, 0.967, and 0.909 for S, L, A, and Tmax, respectively. Based on the results, strong dependencies between interfacial features and the weight functions of materials properties and processing parameters were unveiled. Intriguingly, as the weight function of materials properties for a specific output objective increased, a corresponding decrease in the weight function of processing parameter inputs was observed. These findings emphasize the complex connection between input parameters and output characteristics, revealing previously unexplored intricacies in the impact welding process, facilitated by our advanced ML methodology.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Girne American University

SunMoon University

Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

Erbil Polytechnic University

New Uzbekistan University

Tashkent State Pedagogical University named after Nizami

Editory LLC

Al-Ayen University

University of Babylon

Chaudhary Charan Singh University

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s40194-022-01336-y10.1007/s40194-022-01336-y ↗
2. 10.3390/met1210156510.3390/met12101565 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11665-022-07159-810.1007/s11665-022-07159-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13054910.1016/j.matlet.2021.130549 ↗
5. 10.1080/09276440.2022.209456910.1080/09276440.2022.2094569 ↗
6. Savchenko IV, Shapoval AA, Paleshko YS. Simulation of new multilayer waveguides by explosion welding, in: defect diffus. Forum, Trans Tech Publ. 2021;155–160.
7. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.05010.1016/j.jmst.2020.11.050 ↗
8. 10.1088/2053-1591/ab42ac10.1088/2053-1591/ab42ac ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-021-07755-310.1007/s00170-021-07755-3 ↗
10. 10.1134/S001050822303001210.1134/S0010508223030012 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10987310.1016/j.matdes.2021.109873 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.04910.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.049 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10927910.1016/j.matdes.2020.109279 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11670710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116707 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10479210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104792 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.05510.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.055 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10596110.1016/j.engappai.2023.105961 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00170-023-11035-710.1007/s00170-023-11035-7 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.iswa.2023.20025910.1016/j.iswa.2023.200259 ↗
20. 10.1007/s40194-023-01463-010.1007/s40194-023-01463-0 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12046-023-02193-110.1007/s12046-023-02193-1 ↗
22. 10.1007/s43452-023-00731-610.1007/s43452-023-00731-6 ↗
23. 10.3390/met1302037310.3390/met13020373 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.04710.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.047 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.01710.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.017 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.04910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.09.049 ↗
27. 10.3390/met902014410.3390/met9020144 ↗
28. 10.1142/S021987621846001510.1142/S0219876218460015 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.06610.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.066 ↗
30. 10.1115/1.404167410.1115/1.4041674 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apm.2021.08.03310.1016/j.apm.2021.08.033 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.01610.1016/j.ress.2017.12.016 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10628310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106283 ↗
34. 10.1109/MCI.2022.315532710.1109/MCI.2022.3155327 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11819510.1016/j.actamat.2022.118195 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-020-00372-w10.1038/s41524-020-00372-w ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2023.12273310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2023.122733 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41598-020-71926-710.1038/s41598-020-71926-7 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-021-96723-810.1038/s41598-021-96723-8 ↗
40. 10.1145/345760710.1145/3457607 ↗
41. 10.1109/ICOSEC49089.2020.921527710.1109/ICOSEC49089.2020.9215277 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11743110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117431 ↗
43. Thapliyal S, Mishra A. Machine learning classification-based approach for mechanical properties of friction stir welding of copper, Manuf. Lett. 2021;29:52–55.
44. 10.3390/met1009120210.3390/met10091202 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.05.002 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.03.03910.1016/j.jmapro.2019.03.039 ↗
47. Liang H, Luo N, Chen Y, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations on interface microstructure characteristics and wave formation mechanism of Sn/Cu explosive welded plates, compos. Interfaces. 2023;30:467–491.
48. 10.1007/s00170-019-04054-w10.1007/s00170-019-04054-w ↗