Thermal conductivity prediction of UO2-BeO composite fuels and related decisive features discovery via convolutional neural network
Source abstract
Abstract
Improved thermal conductivity (TC) in UO 2-based fuels is critically important for the security of nuclear reactors. Optimizing the microstructure of UO 2 pellets mixed with high thermally conducting materials such as BeO is an effective way to achieve this goal. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the TC of the UO 2 /BeO composite and their corresponding microstructures by using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The dataset is created by the finite element method. Using the deep transfer learning technique, a well-established CNN (ResNet101) successfully predicts the TC based on the highly similar microstructures while the lightweight CNN fails. Meanwhile, the microstructural features impacting the TC of the UO 2/BeO composite are determined by the ablation class activation map and subsequently verified. Moreover, a proposed microstructural feature contributes to the improved performance of the state-of-the-art machine learning model on our task, indicating its essential role in the TC of the UO 2/BeO composite. This work demonstrates that the critical microstructural features that significantly affect the TC can be discovered by deep learning-based methods and may provide a guideline for enhanced TC of UO 2/BeO fuel via careful design of its microstructure.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. Materials challenges in nuclear energy10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
2. Measurement and interpretation of the thermo-physical properties of UO 2 at high temperatures: The viral effect of oxygen defects10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.060 ↗
3. Nuclear fuel in a reactor accident10.1126/science.1211285 ↗
4. Thermophysical properties of uranium dioxide10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00273-1 ↗
5. The effect of fuel thermal conductivity on the behavior of LWR cores during loss-of-coolant accidents10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.051 ↗
6. Enhanced thermal conductivity accident tolerant fuels for improved reactor safety – A comprehensive review10.1016/j.anucene.2018.04.040 ↗
7. Impact of thermal conductivity models on the coupling of heat transport and oxygen diffusion in UO2 nuclear fuel elements10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.007 ↗
8. Forward for special JNM issue on accident tolerant fuels for LWRs10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.030 ↗
9. Preliminary assessment of accident-tolerant fuels on LWR performance during normal operation and under DB and BDB accident conditions10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.052 ↗
10. Modeling and Measurement of Thermal Properties of Ceramic Composite Fuel for Light Water Reactors10.1080/01457630701825390 ↗
11. The influence of SiC particle size and volume fraction on the thermal conductivity of spark plasma sintered UO2–SiC composites10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.003 ↗
12. Spark plasma sintering of diamond-reinforced uranium dioxide composite fuel pellets10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.08.021 ↗
13. Synthesis and preservation of graphene-supported uranium dioxide nanocrystals10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.03.027 ↗
14. Development Status of Accident-tolerant Fuel for Light Water Reactors in Korea10.1016/j.net.2015.11.011 ↗
15. On the possibility of using uranium-beryllium oxide fuel in a VVER reactor10.1134/S1063778814140063 ↗
16. Characterization of the Annular Core Research Reactor (ACRR) Neutron Radiography System Imaging Plane10.1051/epjconf/201610601005 ↗
17. Fabrication methods and thermal hydraulics analysis of enhanced thermal conductivity UO2–BeO fuel in light water reactors10.1016/j.anucene.2015.02.044 ↗
18. High temperature thermal physical performance of BeO/UO2 composites prepared by spark plasma sintering (SPS)10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.08.031 ↗
19. Electronic-structure methods for materials design10.1038/s41563-021-01013-3 ↗
20. Discovering and understanding materials through computation10.1038/s41563-021-01015-1 ↗
21. Mesoscopic and multiscale modelling in materials10.1038/s41563-020-00913-0 ↗
22. Materials informatics: From the atomic-level to the continuum10.1016/j.actamat.2019.01.051 ↗
23. From predictive modelling to machine learning and reverse engineering of colloidal self-assembly10.1038/s41563-021-01014-2 ↗
24. Studying the micromechanical behaviors of a polycrystalline metal by artificial neural networks10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117006 ↗
25. Mechanical behavior predictions of additively manufactured microstructures using functional Gaussian process surrogates, npj10.1038/s41524-021-00548-y ↗
26. A novel deep learning based method for the computational material design of flexoelectric nanostructures with topology optimization10.1016/j.finel.2019.07.001 ↗
27. Strain anisotropy and magnetic domain structures in multiferroic heterostructures: High-throughput finite-element and phase-field studies10.1016/j.actamat.2019.06.043 ↗
28. High-throughput first-principles search for ceramic superlattices with improved ductility and fracture resistance10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116615 ↗
29. Bi-directional prediction of structural characteristics and effective thermal conductivities of composite fuels through learning from finite element simulation results10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108483 ↗
30. Genetic algorithm-driven discovery of unexpected thermal conductivity enhancement by disorder10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104619 ↗
31. Machine learning prediction of thermal transport in porous media with physics-based descriptors10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120176 ↗
32. Predicting the effective thermal conductivity of composites from cross sections images using deep learning methods10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107861 ↗
33. A fourth-generation high-dimensional neural network potential with accurate electrostatics including non-local charge transfer10.1038/s41467-020-20427-2 ↗
34. Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development10.1038/s41563-019-0338-z ↗
35. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
36. Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: A Scalable Model with the Accuracy of Quantum Mechanics10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 ↗
37. Mechanistic origin and prediction of enhanced ductility in magnesium alloys10.1126/science.aap8716 ↗
38. Designing high ductility in magnesium alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.019 ↗
39. A map of the inorganic ternary metal nitrides10.1038/s41563-019-0396-2 ↗
40. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design10.1038/nmat3568 ↗
41. Design of Nickel-Cobalt-Ruthenium multi-principal element alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2020.05.003 ↗
42. Combinatorial study of thermal stability in ternary nanocrystalline alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.059 ↗
43. Modern data analytics approach to predict creep of high-temperature alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.017 ↗
44. Predicting the effective thermal conductivity of composites from cross sections images using deep learning methods10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107861 ↗
45. Machine-learning interatomic potentials enable first-principles multiscale modeling of lattice thermal conductivity in graphene/borophene heterostructures10.1039/D0MH00787K ↗
46. Machine-learning phase prediction of high-entropy alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.012 ↗
47. Machine learning-based glass formation prediction in multicomponent alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.081 ↗
48. An active learning high-throughput microstructure calibration framework for solving inverse structure–process problems in materials informatics10.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.054 ↗
49. Establishing structure-property localization linkages for elastic deformation of three-dimensional high contrast composites using deep learning approaches10.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.045 ↗
50. Intelligent layout design of curvilinearly stiffened panels via deep learning-based method10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109180 ↗
51. Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109098 ↗
52. Deep neural network approach to estimate biaxial stress-strain curves of sheet metals10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108970 ↗
53. Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials as Emerging Tools for Materials Science10.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
54. Descriptive modeling of textiles using FE simulations and deep learning10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108897 ↗
55. Explainable Machine Learning Algorithms For Predicting Glass Transition Temperatures10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.047 ↗
56. Material structure-property linkages using three-dimensional convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.053 ↗
57. Unsupervised Phase Discovery with Deep Anomaly Detection10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.170603 ↗
58. First-Principles Multiscale Modeling of Mechanical Properties in Graphene/Borophene Heterostructures Empowered by Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials10.1002/adma.202102807 ↗
59. Deep learning model to predict complex stress and strain fields in hierarchical composites10.1126/sciadv.abd7416 ↗
60. Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
61. Autonomous reinforcement learning agent for stretchable kirigami design of 2D materials10.1038/s41524-021-00572-y ↗
62. Deep learning10.1038/nature14539 ↗
63. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Deep Learning, The MIT Press2016.
64. Microstructure recognition using convolutional neural networks for prediction of ionic conductivity in ceramics10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.004 ↗
65. Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks
66. Extracting knowledge from molecular mechanics simulations of grain boundaries using machine learning10.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.009 ↗
67. Physically informed artificial neural networks for atomistic modeling of materials10.1038/s41467-019-10343-5 ↗
68. Deep learning for visualization and novelty detection in large X-ray diffraction datasets, npj10.1038/s41524-021-00575-9 ↗
69. A survey of transfer learning10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 ↗
70. Ablation-CAM: Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Network via Gradient-free Localization
71. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
72. G.C.J. Bart, Thermal conduction in non homogeneous and phase change media, 1994.
73. A Variational Approach to the Theory of the Effective Magnetic Permeability of Multiphase Materials10.1063/1.1728579 ↗
74. Percolation and Conduction10.1103/RevModPhys.45.574 ↗
75. Thermal conductivity of composites of aligned nanoscale and microscale wires and pores10.1063/1.2219162 ↗
76. Thermal conductivity bounds for isotropic, porous materials10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.12.032 ↗
77. Yang · 2012 · 2
78. Bi-directional prediction of structural characteristics and effective thermal conductivities of composite fuels through learning from finite element simulation results10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108483 ↗
79. T.N. Mundhenk, B.Y. Chen, G. Friedland, Efficient Saliency Maps for Explainable AI, ArXiv abs/1911.11293 (2019).
80. Thermal Conductivity of UO2-BeO Pellet10.1080/18811248.1996.9731875 ↗
81. Exploration of optimal microstructure and mechanical properties in continuous microstructure space using a variational autoencoder10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109544 ↗
82. Early progress on additive manufacturing of nuclear fuel materials10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.05.058 ↗
83. Characterizing surrogates to develop an additive manufacturing process for U3Si2 nuclear fuel10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.02.026 ↗
84. Printing soft matter in three dimensions10.1038/nature21003 ↗
85. Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8 ↗
86. Printing ferromagnetic domains for untethered fast-transforming soft materials10.1038/s41586-018-0185-0 ↗
87. Preliminary Concepts of an Automated Additive Manufacturing System for Accident Tolerant Uranium Silicide Fuel Pellets