Machine learning of microstructure–property relationships in materials leveraging microstructure representation from foundational vision transformers
Source abstract
Abstract
Machine learning of microstructure--property relationships from data is an emerging approach in computational materials science. Most existing machine learning efforts focus on the development of task-specific models for each microstructure--property relationship. We propose utilizing pre-trained foundational vision transformers for the extraction of task-agnostic microstructure features and subsequent light-weight machine learning of a microstructure-dependent property. We demonstrate our approach with pre-trained state-of-the-art vision transformers (CLIP, DINOv2, SAM) in two case studies on machine-learning: (i) elastic modulus of two-phase microstructures based on simulations data; and (ii) Vicker's hardness of Ni-base and Co-base superalloys based on experimental data published in literature. Our results show the potential of foundational vision transformers for robust microstructure representation and efficient machine learning of microstructure--property relationships without the need for expensive task-specific training or fine-tuning of bespoke deep learning models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Accelerated prediction of Vickers hardness of Co-and Ni-based superalloys from microstructure and composition using advanced image processing techniques and machine learning10.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.042 ↗
2. Reduced-order models correlating Ti beta 21S microstructures and Vickers hardness measurements10.37256/est.4220233136 ↗
3. Materials knowledge system for nonlinear composites10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.034 ↗
4. A convolutional neural network based crystal plasticity finite element framework to predict localised deformation in metals10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103374 ↗
5. AnisoGNN: Graph neural networks generalizing to anisotropic properties of polycrystals10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113121 ↗
6. FIP-GNN: Graph neural networks for scalable prediction of grain-level fatigue indicator parameters10.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116407 ↗
7. Graph neural network modeling of grain-scale anisotropic elastic behavior using simulated and measured microscale data10.1038/s41524-022-00952-y ↗
8. Kalidindi · 2015
9. Variation of hardness of metals with grain size10.1038/173948b0 ↗
10. XVI. The ductile fracture of polycrystalline α-iron10.1080/14786435608238091 ↗
11. Modeling heterogeneous materials via two-point correlation functions: Basic principles10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031110 ↗
12. The mesostructure–properties linkage in polycrystals10.1016/S0079-6425(98)00002-4 ↗
13. Lineal-path function for random heterogeneous materials10.1103/PhysRevA.45.922 ↗
14. Chord-length distribution function for two-phase random media10.1103/PhysRevE.47.2950 ↗
15. Application of chord length distributions and principal component analysis for quantification and representation of diverse polycrystalline microstructures10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.020 ↗
16. Whitman · 2024
17. Data-driven reduced order models for effective yield strength and partitioning of strain in multiphase materials10.1016/j.jcp.2017.06.013 ↗
18. A machine learning-based design representation method for designing heterogeneous microstructures10.1115/1.4029768 ↗
19. Material structure-property linkages using three-dimensional convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.053 ↗
20. Deep learning approaches for mining structure-property linkages in high contrast composites from simulation datasets10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.014 ↗
21. Physics-informed data-driven surrogate modeling for full-field 3D microstructure and micromechanical field evolution of polycrystalline materials10.1007/s11837-021-04889-3 ↗
22. K. He, H. Fan, Y. Wu, S. Xie, R. Girshick, Momentum contrast for unsupervised visual representation learning, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 9729–9738.10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00975 ↗
23. Language models are few-shot learners
24. Attention is all you need
25. M. Caron, P. Bojanowski, A. Joulin, M. Douze, Deep clustering for unsupervised learning of visual features, in: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, ECCV, 2018, pp. 132–149.10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_9 ↗
26. K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y. Li, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 16000–16009.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01553 ↗
27. A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
28. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision
29. A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, H. Mao, C. Rolland, L. Gustafson, T. Xiao, S. Whitehead, A.C. Berg, W.-Y. Lo, et al., Segment anything, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 4015–4026.10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00371 ↗
30. Oquab · 2023
31. Dosovitskiy · 2020
32. McInnes · 2018
33. Visualizing data using t-SNE
34. Novel microstructure quantification framework for databasing, visualization, and analysis of microstructure data10.1186/2193-9772-2-3 ↗
35. Microstructure segmentation with deep learning encoders pre-trained on a large microscopy dataset10.1038/s41524-022-00878-5 ↗
36. Learning from 2D: machine learning of 3D effective properties of heterogeneous materials based on 2D microstructure sections10.3389/ftmal.2022.1100571 ↗
37. A new TriBeam system for three-dimensional multimodal materials analysis10.1063/1.3680111 ↗
38. In-situ observation of bulk 3D grain evolution during plastic deformation in polycrystalline Cu10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.10.013 ↗
39. Three-dimensional microstructural characterization using focused ion beam tomography10.1557/mrs2007.64 ↗
40. MATLAB spatial correlation toolbox: Release 3.110.1186/s40192-015-0044-x ↗
41. Microstructure, mechanical properties and cracking behaviour in a γ′-precipitation strengthened nickel-base superalloy fabricated by electron beam melting10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.054 ↗
42. Nucleation, growth and coarsening of γ′-precipitates in a Ni–Cr–Al-based commercial superalloy during artificial aging10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.12.068 ↗
43. Effects of aluminum and molybdenum content on the microstructure and properties of multi-component γ′-strengthened cobalt-base superalloys10.1016/j.msea.2018.09.058 ↗
44. E92-17 · 2017
45. Paszke · 2017
46. The OpenCV Library
47. Versatile algorithms for the computation of 2-point spatial correlations in quantifying material structure10.1186/s40192-015-0044-x ↗
48. A tutorial on support vector regression10.1023/B:STCO.0000035301.49549.88 ↗
49. Role of artificial intelligence in quality profiling and optimization of drug products
50. James · 2023
51. Microstructure and tribological performance of novel Ni-based alloy cladding with excellent high temperature wear resistance and self-lubrication performance10.1016/j.surfcoat.2024.131395 ↗
52. Torquato · 2002 · vol. 16
53. Structure–property linkages using a data science approach: application to a non-metallic inclusion/steel composite system10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.045 ↗
54. Segmentation-free image processing and analysis of precipitate shapes in 2D and 3D10.1088/1361-651X/aa67b9 ↗
55. Automated segmentation and chord length distribution of melt pools in complex 3D printed metal artifacts10.1007/s40192-023-00329-z ↗
56. A method for predicting mechanical properties of composite microstructure with reduced dataset based on transfer learning10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114444 ↗
57. Devoto · 2024