Polymer Nanocomposites as Solid Electrolytes: Evaluating Ion−Polymer and Polymer−Nanoparticle Interactions in PEG-PU/PAN Semi-IPNs and Titania Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This paper is an investigation on the physicochemical properties and Li ion conductivity behavior of a new class of polymer nanocomposites, which holds promise for its potential use as solid polymer electrolytes (SPE). A family of nanocomposite semi-interpenetrating polymer networks of titania (TiO 2 )/poly(ethylene glycol)−polyurethane (PEG-PU)/poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) incorporated with LiClO 4 was synthesized. The effects of titania loading, nanoparticle surface functionalization, and ion−polymer and polymer−nanoparticle interactions were evaluated in detail using XRD, FT-IR, TEM, DSC, TG-DTA, and dc conductivity studies. At low degree of TiO 2 loading, reasonably good dispersion and encapsulation within the semi-IPN matrix was achieved. FT-IR studies strongly indicate that analogous to the ion−polymer interaction, a strong interaction coexists between the polymer matrix (C−O−C) and the surface of TiO 2 nanoparticles. Electron micrographs of the semi-IPN nanocomposite films reveal nanophase separation within the polymer matrix. The larger poly(acrylonitrile) domains (∼50−400 nm) along with interspersed titania nanoparticles (∼5−20 nm) are well distributed throughout the PEG-PU parent networks. The even dispersion and low nanoparticle agglomeration apparent from the micrographs also indicate a reasonable degree of polymer−nanoparticle interaction. Interestingly, no substantial change in the thermal properties of the polymer−nanocomposite matrices is observed even with increased amounts of TiO 2 loading (up to 5%) and the glass-transition temperature remained well below the ambient (∼−38 °C). The degradation onset temperature for the semi-IPNs and TiO 2 nanocomposites ( T 0 ∼ 250 °C) suggests good thermal stability of the matrix. An enhancement in ionic conductivity for all the semi-IPN/nanocomposite was observed. The presence of a very disordered polymer phase in the near vicinity of the nanoparticle surface, interfacial dynamics possibly creating smaller domains of PEG segments wherein the cations (Li + ) are more loosely cross-linked under the circumstances of competitive interactions, may help faster ionic transport contributing to the overall increase in the bulk conductivity. Overall, tailoring the polymer−nanocomposite matrices further holds promise toward addressing the practical challenges in the success of solid polymer electrolytes in Li + ion batteries/dye-sensitized solar cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Conducting polymers and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanomaterials Laboratory, Inorganic and Physical Chemistry Division, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 607, India
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Lewis N. S. · Science · 2007 · 315 · 79810.1126/science.1137014 ↗
2. Lewis N. S. · 2005
3. Gratzel M. · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 33810.1038/35104607 ↗
4. Sutula, R. A.; Heitner, K. L.; Rogers, S. A.; Duong, T. Q.; Kirk, R. S.; Battaglia, V.; Henriksen, G.; McLarnon, F.; Kumar, B.; Schonefeld, C.“Recent Accomplishments of the Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs at the U.S. Department of Energy: A Status Report”. Presented at the 17th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Montreal, Canada, October 2000.
5. Sutula, R. A.; Heitner, K. L.; Barnes, J. A.; Duong, T. Q.; Kirk, R. S.; Battaglia, V.; Kumar, B.; Schonefeld, C.”Current Status Report on U.S. Department of Energy Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs”. Presented at the 18th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Berlin, Germany, October 2001.
6. Armand, M. B.; Chabagno, J. M.; Duclot, M. J.InFast Ion Transport in Solids;Vashista, P.; Mundy, J. N.; Shenoy, G. K., Eds.Elsevier North Holland:New York, 1979; p131.
7. Aricó A. S. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 36610.1038/nmat1368 ↗
8. Meyer W. H. · Adv. Mater. · 1998 · 10 · 43910.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199804)10:6<439::AID-ADMA439>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
9. Gray F. M. · 1997
10. Bruce P. G. · 1995
11. Li J. · J. Polym Sci. Polym. Chem. · 1995 · 33 · 165710.1002/pola.1995.080331012 ↗
12. Acosta J. L. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1996 · 60 · 118510.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960523)60:8<1185::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
13. Kobayashi N. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1985 · 89 · 98710.1021/j100252a020 ↗
14. Robitaille C. · Macromolecules · 1983 · 16 · 66510.1021/ma00238a033 ↗
15. Watanabe M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1985 · 57 · 12310.1063/1.335386 ↗
16. Florjanczyk Z. · J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. · 1995 · 33 · 62910.1002/polb.1995.090330413 ↗
17. Allcock H. R. · Macromolecules · 1996 · 29 · 754410.1021/ma960592z ↗
18. Leveque M. · Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. · 1983 · 4 · 49710.1002/marc.1983.030040711 ↗
19. Zhang Z. · Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 77 · 295710.1002/1097-4628(20000923)77:13<2957::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
20. Ichikawa K. · Polymer · 1992 · 33 · 469910.1016/0032-3861(92)90679-Q ↗
21. Sperling, L. H.InInterpenetrating Polymer Networks; Advances in Chemistry Series;Klempner, D.; Sperling, L. H.; Utrachi, L. A., Eds.ACS:Washington, DC, 1994; Vol.239.
22. Croce F. · Nature · 1998 · 394 · 45610.1038/28818 ↗
23. Jayathalaka P. A. R. D. · Electrochim. Acta · 2002 · 47 · 325710.1016/S0013-4686(02)00243-8 ↗
24. Best A. S. · Macromolecules · 2001 · 34 · 454910.1021/ma001837h ↗
25. Marcinek M. · Solid State Ionics · 2000 · 136 · 117510.1016/S0167-2738(00)00580-4 ↗
26. Scrosati B. · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 100 · 9310.1016/S0378-7753(01)00886-2 ↗
27. Ana M. A. S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 310710.1039/B601379A ↗
28. Best A. S. · Solid State Ionics · 1999 · 126 · 26910.1016/S0167-2738(99)00239-8 ↗
29. Croce F. · Nature · 1998 · 394 · 45610.1038/28818 ↗
30. Basak P. · Solid State Ionics · 2004 · 167 · 11310.1016/j.ssi.2004.01.004 ↗
31. Basak P. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2004 · 40 · 115510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.01.013 ↗
32. Basak P. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 117410.1021/jp0460792 ↗
33. Basak P. · J. Macromol. Sci.—Pure Appl. Chem. · 2006 · 43 · 36910.1080/10601320500437292 ↗
34. Niederberger M. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 120210.1021/cm031108r ↗
35. Chu P. P. · Solid State Ionics · 2003 · 156 · 14110.1016/S0167-2738(02)00582-9 ↗
36. Wang F. C. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 1994 · 32 · 1305
37. Wang F. C. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 1994 · 32 · 131510.1002/polb.1994.090320802 ↗
38. Johansson P. · Solid State Ionics · 2004 · 170 · 7310.1016/j.ssi.2003.10.012 ↗
39. Kim S. J. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2003 · 90 · 88110.1002/app.12794 ↗
40. Cascaval C. N. · Polym. Test. · 2003 · 22 · 4510.1016/S0142-9418(02)00047-8 ↗
41. Fainleib A. · Polym. Deg. Stab. · 2002 · 76 · 39310.1016/S0141-3910(02)00031-9 ↗
42. Nielsen, L. E.Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites;Marcel Dekker Inc.:New York, 1974; Vol.1.
43. Ratner M. A. · Chem. Rev. · 1988 · 88 · 10910.1021/cr00083a006 ↗
44. Gray F. M. · 1991
45. MacCallum, J. R.; Vincent, C. A.InPolymer Electrolyte Reviews-1;Elsevier Applied Science:London, 1987; Vol.1.