journal article·2010-08-26Open access

Polymer Nanocomposites as Solid Electrolytes: Evaluating Ion−Polymer and Polymer−Nanoparticle Interactions in PEG-PU/PAN Semi-IPNs and Titania Systems

Md. Selim Arif Sher Shah, Pratyay Basak, Sunkara V. Manorama

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 114· Issue 33

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This paper is an investigation on the physicochemical properties and Li ion conductivity behavior of a new class of polymer nanocomposites, which holds promise for its potential use as solid polymer electrolytes (SPE). A family of nanocomposite semi-interpenetrating polymer networks of titania (TiO 2 )/poly(ethylene glycol)−polyurethane (PEG-PU)/poly(acrylonitrile) (PAN) incorporated with LiClO 4 was synthesized. The effects of titania loading, nanoparticle surface functionalization, and ion−polymer and polymer−nanoparticle interactions were evaluated in detail using XRD, FT-IR, TEM, DSC, TG-DTA, and dc conductivity studies. At low degree of TiO 2 loading, reasonably good dispersion and encapsulation within the semi-IPN matrix was achieved. FT-IR studies strongly indicate that analogous to the ion−polymer interaction, a strong interaction coexists between the polymer matrix (C−O−C) and the surface of TiO 2 nanoparticles. Electron micrographs of the semi-IPN nanocomposite films reveal nanophase separation within the polymer matrix. The larger poly(acrylonitrile) domains (∼50−400 nm) along with interspersed titania nanoparticles (∼5−20 nm) are well distributed throughout the PEG-PU parent networks. The even dispersion and low nanoparticle agglomeration apparent from the micrographs also indicate a reasonable degree of polymer−nanoparticle interaction. Interestingly, no substantial change in the thermal properties of the polymer−nanocomposite matrices is observed even with increased amounts of TiO 2 loading (up to 5%) and the glass-transition temperature remained well below the ambient (∼−38 °C). The degradation onset temperature for the semi-IPNs and TiO 2 nanocomposites ( T 0 ∼ 250 °C) suggests good thermal stability of the matrix. An enhancement in ionic conductivity for all the semi-IPN/nanocomposite was observed. The presence of a very disordered polymer phase in the near vicinity of the nanoparticle surface, interfacial dynamics possibly creating smaller domains of PEG segments wherein the cations (Li + ) are more loosely cross-linked under the circumstances of competitive interactions, may help faster ionic transport contributing to the overall increase in the bulk conductivity. Overall, tailoring the polymer−nanocomposite matrices further holds promise toward addressing the practical challenges in the success of solid polymer electrolytes in Li + ion batteries/dye-sensitized solar cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Conducting polymers and applications · Advancements in Battery Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanomaterials Laboratory, Inorganic and Physical Chemistry Division, Indian Institute of Chemical Technology, Hyderabad 500 607, India

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Lewis N. S. · Science · 2007 · 315 · 79810.1126/science.1137014 ↗
2. Lewis N. S. · 2005
3. Gratzel M. · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 33810.1038/35104607 ↗
4. Sutula, R. A.; Heitner, K. L.; Rogers, S. A.; Duong, T. Q.; Kirk, R. S.; Battaglia, V.; Henriksen, G.; McLarnon, F.; Kumar, B.; Schonefeld, C.“Recent Accomplishments of the Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs at the U.S. Department of Energy: A Status Report”. Presented at the 17th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Montreal, Canada, October 2000.
5. Sutula, R. A.; Heitner, K. L.; Barnes, J. A.; Duong, T. Q.; Kirk, R. S.; Battaglia, V.; Kumar, B.; Schonefeld, C.”Current Status Report on U.S. Department of Energy Electric and Hybrid Electric Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs”. Presented at the 18th International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Berlin, Germany, October 2001.
6. Armand, M. B.; Chabagno, J. M.; Duclot, M. J.InFast Ion Transport in Solids;Vashista, P.; Mundy, J. N.; Shenoy, G. K., Eds.Elsevier North Holland:New York, 1979; p131.
7. Aricó A. S. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 36610.1038/nmat1368 ↗
8. Meyer W. H. · Adv. Mater. · 1998 · 10 · 43910.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199804)10:6<439::AID-ADMA439>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
9. Gray F. M. · 1997
10. Bruce P. G. · 1995
11. Li J. · J. Polym Sci. Polym. Chem. · 1995 · 33 · 165710.1002/pola.1995.080331012 ↗
12. Acosta J. L. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 1996 · 60 · 118510.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960523)60:8<1185::AID-APP11>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
13. Kobayashi N. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1985 · 89 · 98710.1021/j100252a020 ↗
14. Robitaille C. · Macromolecules · 1983 · 16 · 66510.1021/ma00238a033 ↗
15. Watanabe M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1985 · 57 · 12310.1063/1.335386 ↗
16. Florjanczyk Z. · J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. · 1995 · 33 · 62910.1002/polb.1995.090330413 ↗
17. Allcock H. R. · Macromolecules · 1996 · 29 · 754410.1021/ma960592z ↗
18. Leveque M. · Makromol. Chem. Rapid Commun. · 1983 · 4 · 49710.1002/marc.1983.030040711 ↗
19. Zhang Z. · Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2000 · 77 · 295710.1002/1097-4628(20000923)77:13<2957::AID-APP19>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
20. Ichikawa K. · Polymer · 1992 · 33 · 469910.1016/0032-3861(92)90679-Q ↗
21. Sperling, L. H.InInterpenetrating Polymer Networks; Advances in Chemistry Series;Klempner, D.; Sperling, L. H.; Utrachi, L. A., Eds.ACS:Washington, DC, 1994; Vol.239.
22. Croce F. · Nature · 1998 · 394 · 45610.1038/28818 ↗
23. Jayathalaka P. A. R. D. · Electrochim. Acta · 2002 · 47 · 325710.1016/S0013-4686(02)00243-8 ↗
24. Best A. S. · Macromolecules · 2001 · 34 · 454910.1021/ma001837h ↗
25. Marcinek M. · Solid State Ionics · 2000 · 136 · 117510.1016/S0167-2738(00)00580-4 ↗
26. Scrosati B. · J. Power Sources · 2001 · 100 · 9310.1016/S0378-7753(01)00886-2 ↗
27. Ana M. A. S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 310710.1039/B601379A ↗
28. Best A. S. · Solid State Ionics · 1999 · 126 · 26910.1016/S0167-2738(99)00239-8 ↗
29. Croce F. · Nature · 1998 · 394 · 45610.1038/28818 ↗
30. Basak P. · Solid State Ionics · 2004 · 167 · 11310.1016/j.ssi.2004.01.004 ↗
31. Basak P. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2004 · 40 · 115510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.01.013 ↗
32. Basak P. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 117410.1021/jp0460792 ↗
33. Basak P. · J. Macromol. Sci.—Pure Appl. Chem. · 2006 · 43 · 36910.1080/10601320500437292 ↗
34. Niederberger M. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 120210.1021/cm031108r ↗
35. Chu P. P. · Solid State Ionics · 2003 · 156 · 14110.1016/S0167-2738(02)00582-9 ↗
36. Wang F. C. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 1994 · 32 · 1305
37. Wang F. C. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 1994 · 32 · 131510.1002/polb.1994.090320802 ↗
38. Johansson P. · Solid State Ionics · 2004 · 170 · 7310.1016/j.ssi.2003.10.012 ↗
39. Kim S. J. · J. Appl. Polym. Sci. · 2003 · 90 · 88110.1002/app.12794 ↗
40. Cascaval C. N. · Polym. Test. · 2003 · 22 · 4510.1016/S0142-9418(02)00047-8 ↗
41. Fainleib A. · Polym. Deg. Stab. · 2002 · 76 · 39310.1016/S0141-3910(02)00031-9 ↗
42. Nielsen, L. E.Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites;Marcel Dekker Inc.:New York, 1974; Vol.1.
43. Ratner M. A. · Chem. Rev. · 1988 · 88 · 10910.1021/cr00083a006 ↗
44. Gray F. M. · 1991
45. MacCallum, J. R.; Vincent, C. A.InPolymer Electrolyte Reviews-1;Elsevier Applied Science:London, 1987; Vol.1.