Glass hardness: Predicting composition and load effects via symbolic reasoning-informed machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Glass hardness varies in a non-linear fashion with the chemical composition and applied load, a phenomenon known as the indentation size effect (ISE), which is challenging to predict quantitatively. Here, using a curated dataset of over approx. 3000 inorganic glasses from the literature comprising the composition, indentation load, and hardness, we develop machine learning (ML) models to predict the composition and load dependence of Vickers hardness. Interestingly, when tested on new glass compositions unseen during the training, the standard data-driven ML model failed to capture the ISE. To address this gap, we combined an empirical expression (Bernhardt law) to describe the ISE with ML to develop a framework that incorporates the symbolic law representing the domain reasoning in ML, namely Symbolic Reasoning-Informed ML Procedure (SRIMP). We show that the resulting SRIMP outperforms the data-driven ML model in predicting the ISE. Finally, we interpret the SRIMP model to understand the contribution of the glass network formers and modifiers toward composition and load-dependent (ISE) and load-independent hardness. The deconvolution of the hardness into load-dependent and load-independent terms paves the way toward a holistic understanding of composition and ISE in glasses, enabling the accelerated discovery of new glass compositions with targeted hardness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Glass properties and applications · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. Glassy wasteforms for nuclear waste immobilization10.1007/s11661-010-0525-7 ↗
2. Glass material and their advanced applications
3. Scratch Resistance of Sodium Borosilicate Glass10.2109/jcersj.109.1270_511 ↗
4. Indentation of glasses10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100834 ↗
5. Indentation deformation and cracking in oxide glass –toward understanding of crack nucleation
6. Indentation deformation in oxide glasses: quantification, structural changes, and relation to cracking
7. Die physikalischen Eigenschaften der Gläser in Abhängigkeit von der Zusammensetzung
8. Towards understanding the scratchability in functional glasses10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.04.233 ↗
9. Varshneya · 2019
10. A different type of indentation size effect10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.026 ↗
11. Dynamic softening and indentation size effect in a Zr-based bulk glass-forming alloy10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.12.014 ↗
12. Micro-indentation hardness10.1177/00220345610400060401 ↗
13. Microhardness indentation size effect studies in 60B2O3-(40-x)PbO-xMCl2 and 50B2O3(50-x)PbO-xMCl2 (M = Pb, Cd) glasses10.1007/s10853-005-0666-z ↗
14. Oxide glass exhibits plasticity without fracture at room temperature10.1557/mrs.2020.48 ↗
15. The indentation load/size effect and the measurement of the hardness of vitreous silica10.1016/S0022-3093(05)80492-2 ↗
16. Modeling the nanoindentation response of silicate glasses by peridynamic simulations10.1111/jace.17720 ↗
17. Understanding the role of post-indentation recovery on the hardness of glasses: case of silica, borate, and borosilicate glasses10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.119955 ↗
18. New insights into the indentation size effect in silicate glasses10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119494 ↗
19. Über die Mikrohärte der Feststoffe im Grenzbereich des Kick'schen Ähnlichkeitssatzes
20. Integrating machine learning with symbolic reasoning to build an explainable AI model for stroke prediction
21. Deep learning aided rational design of oxide glasses10.1039/D0MH00162G ↗
22. Understanding the compositional control on electrical, mechanical, optical, and physical properties of inorganic glasses with interpretable machine learning
23. Extracting processing and testing parameters from materials science literature for improved property prediction of glasses
24. Explainable machine learning algorithms for predicting glass transition temperatures10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.047 ↗
25. Predicting and interpreting oxide glass properties by machine learning using large datasets10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.105 ↗
26. Designing optical glasses by machine learning coupled with a genetic algorithm10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.167 ↗
27. Machine learning unveils composition-property relationships in chalcogenide glasses10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118302 ↗
28. Accelerated design of chalcogenide glasses through interpretable machine learning for composition–property relationships10.1088/2515-7639/acc6f2 ↗
29. Machine learning unveils composition-property relationships in chalcogenide glasses10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118302 ↗
30. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in glass science and technology: 21 challenges for the 21st century10.1111/ijag.15881 ↗
31. Interpreting the optical properties of oxide glasses with machine learning and Shapely additive explanations10.1111/jace.18345 ↗
32. Predicting and interpreting oxide glass properties by machine learning using large datasets10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.105 ↗
33. ArXiv Preprint
34. Accelerated prediction of Vickers hardness of Co- and Ni-based superalloys from microstructure and composition using advanced image processing techniques and machine learning10.1016/j.actamat.2020.06.042 ↗
35. Prediction of Vickers hardness of amorphous alloys based on interpretable machine learning10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.122095 ↗
36. Extraction of mechanical properties of materials through deep learning from instrumented indentation10.1073/pnas.1922210117 ↗
37. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
38. ViscNet: neural network for predicting the fragility index and the temperature-dependency of viscosity10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116602 ↗
39. Predicting glass structure by physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s41524-022-00882-9 ↗
40. Knowledge extraction and transfer in data-driven fracture mechanics10.1073/pnas.2104765118 ↗
41. Thermal-fluctuation gradient induced tangential entropic forces in layered two-dimensional materials10.1016/j.jmps.2022.104871 ↗
42. Indenting glasses with indenters of varying stiffness and sharpness10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.122111 ↗
43. Elastic and micromechanical properties of isostatically compressed soda–lime–borate glasses10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.01.009 ↗
44. Part II: vickers hardness and refractive index10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.04.003 ↗
45. The load dependence of hardness in alumina–silver composites10.1016/S0272-8842(00)00095-X ↗
46. Indentation size effect in the nanohardness of soda-lime glass10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.280-283.1659 ↗
47. Load effect on the mechanical behaviour of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramics10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.257 ↗
48. Über die Mikrohärte der Feststoffe im Grenzbereich des Kick'schen Ähnlichkeitssatzes10.1515/ijmr-1941-330305 ↗
49. sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler, Scikit-Learn. (n.d.). https://scikit-learn/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html (accessed January 5, 2023).
50. Leakage in data mining: formulation, detection, and avoidance10.1145/2382577.2382579 ↗
51. PyTorch, (n.d.). https://www.pytorch.org (accessed October 14, 2022).
52. Array programming with NumPy10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
53. J. Reback, W. McKinney, jbrockmendel, J.V. den Bossche, T. Augspurger, P. Cloud, gfyoung, Sinhrks, S. Hawkins, M. Roeschke, A. Klein, T. Petersen, J. Tratner, C. She, W. Ayd, S. Naveh, M. Garcia, J. Schendel, A. Hayden, D. Saxton, V. Jancauskas, A. McMaster, P. Battiston, patrick, S. Seabold, K. Dong, chris-b1, h-vetinari, S. Hoyer, M. Gorelli, pandas-dev/pandas: pandas 1.2.0rc0, (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4311557.
54. Matplotlib: a 2D Graphics Environment10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 ↗
55. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
56. Predicting boron coordination in multicomponent borate and borosilicate glasses using analytical models and machine learning
57. The distribution of aluminum in the tetrahedra of silicates and aluminates
58. Density of topological constraints as a metric for predicting glass hardness10.1063/1.4991971 ↗
59. Elastic Properties and Short-to Medium-Range Order in Glasses10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01945.x ↗
60. Structure-topology-property correlations of sodium phosphosilicate glasses10.1063/1.4928330 ↗
61. Understanding the compositional control on electrical, mechanical, optical, and physical properties of inorganic glasses with interpretable machine learning10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118439 ↗
62. Structural Role of Sodium in Borosilicate, Phosphosilicate, and Borophosphosilicate Glasses Unveiled by Solid-State NMR and MD Simulations
63. Density of topological constraints as a metric for predicting glass hardness10.1063/1.4991971 ↗
64. Predicting boron coordination in multicomponent borate and borosilicate glasses using analytical models and machine learning10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2020.120490 ↗
65. Structure-topology-property correlations of sodium phosphosilicate glasses10.1063/1.4928330 ↗
66. The distribution of aluminum in the tetrahedra of silicates and aluminates