Influence of dopants on atomic migration and void formation in molten Ge2Sb2Te5 under high-amplitude electrical pulse
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study systemically investigates the retardation of electrical-stress-induced degradation in Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 (GST) by modifying its material properties through doping. The effects of doping on the electromigration and void formation in molten GST are explored by studying the model of a large and symmetric line-shaped GST cell doped with nitrogen, oxygen and bismuth, using high-amplitude electrical pulse stress. The electromigration rate, which is represented by the product of the diffusion coefficient and effective charge number ( DZ * ), and the amount of void formation in doped GST are quantified and compared with undoped GST. The DZ * and void area in Bi-doped GST increased by ∼10% compared with those in undoped GST; these values decreased by 30% and 45% in the O- and N-doped GST, respectively. The results suggest that the interstitial-type dopant could suppress the electromigration rate and void formation by decreasing the free volume; however, the substitutional-type dopant could not. The change in the free volume of molten GST due to dopants led to the change in the electromigration rate and the area of void formation. Understanding how the atomic-bonding type of dopants affects the degradation phenomena helps in designing phase-change material that is more stable against device failures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Jeong CW, Ahn SJ, Hwang YN, Song YJ, Oh JH, Lee SY, et al. IEEE NVSMW 2004; 2004. p. 28.
2. Gleixner B. IEEE NVSMW 2007; 2007.
3. Chen CF, Schrott A, Lee MH, Raoux S, Shih YH, Breitwisch M, et al. In: 2009 IEEE international memory workshop, IMW ’09; 2009. p. 5090589.
4. Kim K, Ahn SJ. In: IEEE reliability physics symposium proceedings: IEEE international; 2005. p. 157.
5. Rajendran B, Lee MH, Breitwisch M, Burr GW, Shih YH, Cheek R, et al. In: 2008 Symposium on VLSI technology; 2008. p. 96.10.1109/VLSIT.2008.4588576 ↗
6. Bedeschi F, Resta C, Khouri O, Buda E, Costa L, Ferraro M, et al. In: 2004 Symposium on VLSI circuits, Honolulu, HI; 2004. p. 442.
7. Kang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 95 · 01190410.1063/1.3168517 ↗
8. Nam · Electrochem Solid-State Lett · 2009 · 12 · H15510.1149/1.3079480 ↗
9. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 95 · 03210410.1063/1.3184584 ↗
10. Park · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2011 · 50
11. Yang · Electrochem Solid-State Lett · 2010 · 13 · H32110.1149/1.3460295 ↗
12. Borisenko · Chem Mater · 2009 · 21 · 524410.1021/cm9022612 ↗
13. Kojima R, Okabayashi S, Kashihara T, Horai K, Matsunaga T, Ohno E, et al. Jpn J Appl Phys 1: Regul Pap Short Notes Rev Pap 1998; 37: 2098.10.1143/JJAP.37.2098 ↗
14. Jeong · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2009 · 48 · 04550310.1143/JJAP.48.045503 ↗
15. Jeong TH, Kim MR, Seo H, Park JW, Yeon C. Jpn J Appl Phys 1: Regul Pap Short Notes Rev Pap 2000; 39: 2775.10.1143/JJAP.39.2775 ↗
16. Kölpin · J Phys Condens Matter · 2009 · 21
17. Seo H, Jeong TH, Park JW, Yeon C, Kim SJ, Kim SY. Jpn J Appl Phys 1: Regul Pap Short Notes Rev Pap 2000; 39: 745.10.1143/JJAP.39.745 ↗
18. Cho · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 109
19. Privitera · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 304410.1063/1.1805200 ↗
20. Wang · Microsyst Technol · 2007 · 13 · 20310.1007/s00542-006-0156-5 ↗
21. Edwards · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 04521010.1103/PhysRevB.73.045210 ↗
22. Matsunaga T, Yamada N. Jpn J Appl Phys 1: Regul Pap Short Notes Rev Pap 2002; 41: 1674.10.1143/JJAP.41.1674 ↗
23. Wuttig · Nat Mater · 2007 · 6 · 12210.1038/nmat1807 ↗
24. Kim · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 02190810.1063/1.2431462 ↗