journal article·2022-11

Machine learning unveils composition-property relationships in chalcogenide glasses

Saulo Martiello Mastelini, Daniel R. Cassar, Edesio Alcobaça, Tiago Botari, André C.P.L.F. de Carvalho, Edgar D. Zanotto

Acta Materialia· Volume 240
Publisher page

Abstract

Due to their unique optical and electronic functionalities, chalcogenide glasses are materials of choice for numerous microelectronic and photonic devices. However, to extend the range of compositions and applications, profound knowledge about composition-property relationships is necessary. To this end, we collected a large quantity of composition-property data on chalcogenide glasses from SciGlass database regarding glass transition temperature ($T_g$), Young's modulus ($E$), coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), and refractive index ($n_D$). With these data, we induced predictive models using three machine learning algorithms: Random Forest, K-nearest Neighbors, and Classification and Regression Trees. Finally, the induced models were interpreted by computing the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values of the chemical features, which revealed the key elements that significantly impacted the tested properties and quantified their impact. For instance, Ge and Ga increase $T_g$ and $E$ and decrease CTE (three properties that depend on bond strength), whereas Se has the opposite effect. Te, As, Tl, and Sb increase $n_D$ (which strongly depends on polarizability), whereas S, Ge, and P diminish it. Knowledge about the effect of each element on the glass properties is precious for semi-empirical compositional development trials or simulation-driven formulations. The induced models can be used to design novel chalcogenide glasses with required combinations of properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Phase-change materials and chalcogenides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Adam · 2014
2. Strong and fragile liquids
3. Classical-nucleation-theory analysis of priming in chalcogenide phase-change memory10.1016/j.actamat.2017.08.013 ↗
4. Chalcogenide glass-ceramics: functional design and crystallization mechanism10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.11.001 ↗
5. Softening temperatures of some chalcogenide glasses10.1007/BF00689641 ↗
6. Predicting glass transition temperatures using neural networks10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.022 ↗
7. Machine learning for glass modeling10.1007/978-3-319-93728-1_33 ↗
8. Explainable machine learning algorithms for predicting glass transition temperatures10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.047 ↗
9. Machine learning on density and elastic property of oxide glasses driven by large dataset10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119768 ↗
10. Deep learning aided rational design of oxide glasses10.1039/D0MH00162G ↗
11. Interpreting the optical properties of oxide glasses with machine learning and Shapely additive explanations10.1111/jace.18345 ↗
12. R. Ravinder, S. Bishnoi, M. Zaki, N.M.A. Krishnan, Understanding the compositional control on electrical, mechanical, optical, and physical properties of inorganic glasses with interpretable machine learning, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, 2022. 10.2139/ssrn.4075602 is preprint from Acta Materialia first look (the paper is still in the review stage) available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4075602.
13. Scalable Gaussian processes for predicting the optical, physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of inorganic glasses with large datasets10.1039/D0MA00764A ↗
14. ViscNet: neural network for predicting the fragility index and the temperature-dependency of viscosity10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116602 ↗
15. Predicting and interpreting oxide glass properties by machine learning using large datasets10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.105 ↗
16. Designing optical glasses by machine learning coupled with a genetic algorithm10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.167 ↗
17. Hybrid machine learning/physics-based approach for predicting oxide glass-forming ability
18. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization of optical glass compositions10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.155 ↗
19. Predicting Asx Se1 - x glass transition onset temperature10.1007/s10765-020-02734-4 ↗
20. Deep machine learning unravels the structural origin of mid-gap states in chalcogenide glass for high-density memory integration10.1002/inf2.12315 ↗
21. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
22. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0 ↗
23. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
24. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python
25. Cross-validation pitfalls when selecting and assessing regression and classification models10.1186/1758-2946-6-10 ↗
26. Nested cross-validation when selecting classifiers is overzealous for most practical applications10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115222 ↗
27. A value for n-person games
28. F. Bodria, F. Giannotti, R. Guidotti, F. Naretto, D. Pedreschi, S. Rinzivillo, Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models, ArXiv:2102.13076 [Cs]. (2021). arxiv.org/abs/2102.13076 (accessed May 13, 2021).
29. Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods
30. On the structure of boron oxide and alkali borate glasses
31. New evidence on the boron coordination in alkali borate glasses
32. Varshneya · 2019
33. Breiman · 2017
34. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest neighbor classification
35. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 ↗
36. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
37. Partial radial distribution functions for a two-component glassy solid, GeSe3, from scattering experimental data using an artificial intelligence framework10.1007/s00894-022-05055-5 ↗