Source abstract
Abstract
The kinetics and mechanism of a second-generation iridium, bimetallic {[(1,5-COD)Ir I ·HPO4] 2 } 2– nanoparticle precursor system that produces Ir(0) ∼150 ·(HPO 4 ) x nanoparticles are investigated herein. Specifically, a list of seven open questions is addressed via a total of five experimental techniques used to monitor the kinetics of the {[(1,5-COD)Ir I ·HPO4] 2 } 2– system plus mechanism-enabled population balance modeling (ME-PBM), hence six total methods. To start, an indirect but in-house cyclohexene catalytic reporter reaction monitoring method is used to follow the formation of the catalytically active Ir(0) n . Next, gas–liquid chromatography is used to quantify the amount of cyclooctane product formed versus time as a second way to monitor the loss of the {[(1,5-COD)Ir I ·HPO4] 2 } 2– precatalyst. Synchrotron X-ray absorption near-edge structure is used next to more directly monitor the reduction of Ir I to Ir 0, and small-angle X-ray scattering is employed in separate experiments at a second synchrotron to monitor the formation of Ir(0) n versus time. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on reaction aliquots is used to determine the particle size distribution (PSD) versus time. The experimental kinetics data are then fit and analyzed to start using a minimal, two-step mechanism of nucleation, A → B (rate constant k 1 ), and autocatalytic growth, A + B → 2B (rate constant k 2 ). How well the rate constants agree between the various methods is addressed as is the overall estimated accuracy of the kinetics in light of the multiple methods employed to monitor the particle formation kinetics. ME-PBM is then used to analyze the TEM PSD data versus time, specifically to answer the question of whether or not the minimum mechanism consistent with all the kinetic data from the five physical methods can explain the observed PSD? An important finding is that it cannot. The Discussion section returns to the seven primary questions posed in the Introduction and includes 16 recommendations for future studies. A Conclusions section is also provided in this final experimental study from our group of prototype Ir(0) n nanoparticle formation kinetics and mechanisms.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
Department of Mathematics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
Division of Chemistry, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States
Callaghan Innovation, P.O. Box 31310, Lower Hutt 5040, New Zealand
Australian Synchrotron, 800 Blackburn Road, Clayton 3168, Australia
Funding
Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth