Self-Assembly of a Jammed Black Phosphorus Nanoribbon on a Fixed Carbon Nanotube
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanotube synthesizing from black phosphorus (BP) is still challenging in laboratory. Fabricating a BP nanotube by self-assembling of a BP nanoribbon seems promising. To estimate the feasibility of such fabrication method, this study performs numerical experiments of self-assembling a jammed BP ribbon on a fixed carbon nanotube using molecular dynamics simulation. The study is based on the following two facts: The phosphorus–phosphorus (P–P) bond is weaker than the bond of carbon–carbon (C–C) and the van der Waals interaction among nonbonding phosphorus atoms is stronger than that between phosphorus atoms and carbon atoms. The results show that when a longer BP ribbon is jammed by a shorter BP ribbon the self-assembling result depends on the relative positions of carbon nanotube (CNT) and the two BP ribbons. Only when the shorter BP ribbon is on the outside of the longer ribbon can the longer BP ribbon be wound on the CNT to form an ideal BP nanotube. The finding is helpful for practical applications of BP nanotubes in nanodevices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Graphene research and applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials and Structural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
Research School of Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0378-4363(81)90222-910.1016/0378-4363(81)90222-9 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2014.3510.1038/nnano.2014.35 ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms565110.1038/ncomms5651 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms547510.1038/ncomms5475 ↗
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.2310.1038/nphoton.2015.23 ↗
6. 10.1088/1612-2011/13/4/04580110.1088/1612-2011/13/4/045801 ↗
7. 10.1039/C4CC05752J10.1039/C4CC05752J ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms956310.1038/ncomms9563 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20140515010.1002/adma.201405150 ↗
10. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl500360810.1021/nl5003608 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.04310.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.043 ↗
13. 10.1088/0256-307X/26/8/08070110.1088/0256-307X/26/8/080701 ↗
14. 10.1002/jrs.258410.1002/jrs.2584 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.16310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.163 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.115799610.1126/science.1157996 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.116713010.1126/science.1167130 ↗
18. Li D. S. · Zhongguo Youse Jinshu Xuebao · 2015 · 25 · 1498
19. 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00045-210.1016/S0009-2614(99)00045-2 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp505257g10.1021/jp505257g ↗
21. 10.1088/0022-3727/48/39/39530310.1088/0022-3727/48/39/395303 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.852010.1103/PhysRevB.59.8520 ↗
23. 10.1002/anie.20046024410.1002/anie.200460244 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn102531h10.1021/nn102531h ↗
25. 10.1039/c3nr03558a10.1039/c3nr03558a ↗
26. 10.1021/jp505830810.1021/jp5058308 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.02210.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.022 ↗
28. 10.1088/1361-6463/50/2/02530410.1088/1361-6463/50/2/025304 ↗
29. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/23/23570310.1088/0957-4484/27/23/235703 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0114310.1021/acsnano.5b01143 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0359210.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03592 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.03510510.1103/PhysRevB.86.035105 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.08410.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.084 ↗
34. 10.1038/nmat429910.1038/nmat4299 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cap.2015.11.01010.1016/j.cap.2015.11.010 ↗
36. 10.1098/rspa.1924.008210.1098/rspa.1924.0082 ↗
37. LAMMPS, Molecular Dynamics Simulator. http://lammps.sandia.gov/(Accessed March 5, 2017) .
38. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
41. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/31/31570610.1088/0957-4484/26/31/315706 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.491653810.1063/1.4916538 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
44. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/23/23570710.1088/0957-4484/26/23/235707 ↗