Role of Domain Size and Phase Purity on Charge Carrier Density, Mobility, and Recombination in Poly(3-hexylthiophene):Phenyl-C61-butyric Acid Methyl Ester Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of a bulk heterojunction (BHJ) organic solar cell is influenced by the morphology (domain size and connectivity, phase purity, and interfacial structure) of the donor:acceptor blend active layer. The design of experiments to understand interrelationships between structure, transport properties, and device performance remains an important challenge. To this end, we created different types of morphologies in the poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT)/phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC 61 BM) active layer by exploiting different processing strategies: conventional solvent casting, supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO 2 ) processing, and thermal annealing. We investigated the device characteristics and transport behavior (carrier densities, mobilities and recombination) of samples possessing comparable domain sizes, which exhibited comparable initial carrier densities upon illumination. Notably, however, one morphology exhibited PCE, short circuit current ( J SC ), and carrier mobility that were each approximately a factor of 3 larger than the other morphologies. We also investigated another case where, in spite of significant differences between the domain dimensions, the PCE and J SC values were quite similar. These observations are rationalized on the basis of interrelations between aspects of the active material morphology, the transport properties, and the device efficiencies. This work provides insight into morphological design of active layers for optimum device performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, ‡Biointerfaces Institute, §Applied Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim J. Y. · Science · 2007 · 317 · 22210.1126/science.1141711 ↗
2. Hoth C. N. · Nano Lett. · 2008 · 8 · 280610.1021/nl801365k ↗
3. Krebs F. C. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 196810.1016/j.solmat.2009.07.015 ↗
4. Liang Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · E13510.1002/adma.200903528 ↗
5. He Z. · Nat. Photon. · 2012 · 6 · 593
6. Peet J. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2009 · 42 · 170010.1021/ar900065j ↗
7. Brabec C. J. · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2011 · 40 · 118510.1039/C0CS00045K ↗
8. Pfannmöller M. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 309910.1021/nl201078t ↗
9. Sariciftci N. S. · Science · 1992 · 258 · 147410.1126/science.258.5087.1474 ↗
10. Barker J. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 07520510.1103/PhysRevB.67.075205 ↗
11. Moses D. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2001 · 98 · 1349610.1073/pnas.241497098 ↗
12. Koster L. J. A. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 08520510.1103/PhysRevB.72.085205 ↗
13. Yu G. · Science · 1995 · 270 · 178910.1126/science.270.5243.1789 ↗
14. Sirringhaus H. · Nature · 1999 · 401 · 68510.1038/44359 ↗
15. Treat N. D. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2011 · 1 · 8210.1002/aenm.201000023 ↗
16. Lyons B. P. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 765710.1039/c2ee21327c ↗
17. Groves C. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 320210.1039/c3ee41621f ↗
18. Shaw P. E. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 351610.1002/adma.200800982 ↗
19. Kim Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 06350210.1063/1.1861123 ↗
20. McNeill C. R. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 230910.1002/adfm.200800182 ↗
21. Moulé A. J. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 302810.1002/adfm.200900775 ↗
22. Amonoo J. A. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 2070810.1021/jp304976x ↗
23. Mozer A. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 11210410.1063/1.1882753 ↗
24. Drummy L. F. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 90710.1021/cm102463t ↗
25. Peumans P. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 369310.1063/1.1534621 ↗
26. Marsh R. A. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 92310.1021/nl9038289 ↗
27. Yang X. · Adv. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 80210.1002/adma.200306372 ↗
28. Spano F. C. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 122 · 23470110.1063/1.1914768 ↗
29. Frank C. S. · Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 325 · 2210.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.019 ↗
30. Clark J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 16330610.1063/1.3110904 ↗
31. Pivrikas A. · Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. · 2007 · 15 · 67710.1002/pip.791 ↗
32. Scheblykin I. G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 630310.1021/jp068864f ↗
33. Keivanidis P. E. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 73410.1021/jz900296f ↗
34. Zhang Y. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2011 · 1 · 61010.1002/aenm.201100040 ↗
35. Garcia-Belmonte G. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 11330110.1063/1.3358121 ↗
36. Ripolles T. S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 24330610.1063/1.4841475 ↗
37. Montanari I. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 300110.1063/1.1512943 ↗
38. Nogueira A. F. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 156710.1021/jp027101z ↗
39. Nelson J. · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 451 · 50810.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.064 ↗
40. Adriaenssens G. J. · Solid State Commun. · 1997 · 103 · 54110.1016/S0038-1098(97)00233-0 ↗
41. Koster L. J. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 09351110.1063/1.2181635 ↗
42. Groves C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 15520510.1103/PhysRevB.78.155205 ↗
43. Szmytkowski J. d. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 470 · 12310.1016/j.cplett.2009.01.043 ↗
44. Mozer A. J. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 389 · 43810.1016/j.cplett.2004.04.001 ↗
45. Huang B. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 520410.1021/am3011252 ↗
46. Bässler H. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 1993 · 175 · 1510.1002/pssb.2221750102 ↗
47. Kim M.-S. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 126410.1021/am900155y ↗