Surface Strain Effects on the Water–Graphene Interfacial and Confinement Behavior
Source abstract
Abstract
We studied via molecular dynamics the link between the strain-driven hydration free-energy changes in the association process involving finite-size graphene surfaces, the resulting water–graphene interfacial tension, and the combined effect of the surface strain and confinement on the thermodynamic response functions and the dynamics of confined water. We found that an in-plane biaxial tensile strain ε = 10% enhances significantly not only the water–graphene hydrophobicity with respect to that of the unstrained counterpart but also the confinement effect on the thermodynamic response functions and slowing down of the dynamics of water over those of the corresponding bulk counterpart. The interfacial behavior of water in contact with strained-graphene plates resembles that observed for “pp” corrugated-plate configuration, as reported earlier [Chialvo et al. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 23875], exibiting a significant enhancement of the fluid–surface hydrophobicity and response functions relative to those of the unstrained surface. In contrast, the slowing down of the dynamics of the confined water does not show any differentiation with respect to the type of surface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemical Sciences Division Geochemistry & Interfacial Sciences Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6110, United States
Joint Institute for Computational Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6173, United States
Dept. of Chemical and Bio-molecular Engineering Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235-1604, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Choudhury N. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 355610.1021/ja0441817 ↗
2. Choudhury N. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 642210.1021/jp045439i ↗
3. Choudhury N. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 845910.1021/jp056909r ↗
4. Choudhury N. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 484710.1021/ja069242a ↗
5. Choudhury N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 256510.1021/jp066883j ↗
6. Choudhury N. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 06450510.1063/1.3319504 ↗
7. Choudhury N. · Mol. Simul. · 2005 · 31 · 45710.1080/08927020500035457 ↗
8. Zhang L. M. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 1
9. Eun C. S. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2011 · 115 · 605910.1021/jp110608p ↗
10. Jiang Q. G. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 1085910.1039/c3cp00128h ↗
11. Ostrowski J. H. J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2014 · 118 · 53010.1021/jp409342n ↗
12. Shin Y. J. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 379810.1021/la100231u ↗
13. Li X. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1410610.1021/jp4045258 ↗
14. Quere D. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2008 · 38 · 7110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132434 ↗
15. Shih C. J. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 86610.1038/nmat3760 ↗
16. Raj R. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 150910.1021/nl304647t ↗
17. Zhou H. · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 03540610.1103/PhysRevB.85.035406 ↗
18. Yoon D. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 322710.1021/nl201488g ↗
19. Song F. H. · Langmuir · 2013 · 29 · 426610.1021/la304763a ↗
20. Chialvo A. A. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 2387510.1021/jp408893b ↗
21. Daub C. D. · Faraday Discuss. · 2010 · 146 · 6710.1039/b927061m ↗
22. Gordillo M. C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 458310.1021/jp9114332 ↗
23. Carbone G. · Eur. Phys. J. E · 2005 · 16 · 6710.1140/epje/e2005-00008-y ↗
24. Fasolino A. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 85810.1038/nmat2011 ↗
25. Pereira V. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 15660310.1103/PhysRevLett.105.156603 ↗
26. Bao W. Z. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 56210.1038/nnano.2009.191 ↗
27. Pan W. · Sci. Rep. · 2012 · 2 · 1
28. Murmu T. · Composites, Part B · 2013 · 44 · 8410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.053 ↗
29. Wei N. · Nanotechnology · 2011 · 22 · 10570510.1088/0957-4484/22/10/105705 ↗
30. Min K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 01311310.1063/1.3534787 ↗
31. Xiong W. · Phys. Rev. E · 2011 · 84 · 05632910.1103/PhysRevE.84.056329 ↗
32. Zang J. F. · Nat. Mater. · 2013 · 12 · 32110.1038/nmat3542 ↗
33. Rakshit B. · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 15340710.1103/PhysRevB.82.153407 ↗
34. Sharma S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2012 · 116 · 1328210.1021/jp308362h ↗
35. Berendsen H. J. C. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1987 · 91 · 626910.1021/j100308a038 ↗
36. Nose S. · J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. · 2001 · 70 · 7510.1143/JPSJ.70.75 ↗
37. Okumura H. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 08410310.1063/1.2434972 ↗
38. Striolo A. · Mol. Phys. · 2004 · 102 · 24310.1080/00268970410001668507 ↗
39. Chialvo A. A. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2011 · 115 · 591810.1021/jp110318n ↗
40. Watanabe K. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1986 · 90 · 79510.1021/j100277a019 ↗
41. Trzesniak D. · ChemPhysChem · 2007 · 8 · 16210.1002/cphc.200600527 ↗
42. Ben-Naim A. · 198710.1007/978-1-4757-6550-2 ↗
43. Guardia E. · Mol. Simul. · 1992 · 9 · 20110.1080/08927029208047427 ↗
44. Jorgensen W. L. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 1989 · 22 · 18410.1021/ar00161a004 ↗
45. Chialvo A. A. · J. Chem. Eng. Data · 2010 · 55 · 182810.1021/je900788r ↗
46. Egelstaff P. A. · 1994
47. Kohlrausch R. · Ann. Phys. Chem. · 1854 · 91 · 17910.1002/andp.18541670203 ↗
48. Berberan-Santos M. N. · Chem. Phys. · 2005 · 315 · 17110.1016/j.chemphys.2005.04.006 ↗
49. Abramowitz M. · 1965
50. Colmenero J. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1999 · 11 · A363
51. Zanotti J. M. · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 59 · 308410.1103/PhysRevE.59.3084 ↗
52. Tironi I. G. · Mol. Phys. · 1994 · 83 · 38110.1080/00268979400101331 ↗
53. Zhu C. Q. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 12610110.1103/PhysRevLett.110.126101 ↗
54. Choudhury N. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 629610.1021/jp801852v ↗
55. Eun C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 1341010.1021/jp1072654 ↗
56. Chen S. H. · Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 56 · 423110.1103/PhysRevE.56.4231 ↗
57. Choudhury N. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2007 · 111 · 1047410.1021/jp073571n ↗
58. Choudhury N. · Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 421 · 6810.1016/j.chemphys.2013.06.001 ↗
59. Bocquet L. · Soft Matter · 2007 · 3 · 68510.1039/b616490k ↗
60. Werder T. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 134510.1021/jp0268112 ↗
61. Note that any potential discrepancy between the two water–graphene model representations becomes less relevant because the comparison involved relative values, in addition to the fact that both graphene–water models predict essentially the same contact angle theta=95o for the unstrained flat surface.
62. Erb R. A. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1965 · 69 · 130610.1021/j100888a035 ↗
63. Giovambattista N. · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 73 · 04160410.1103/PhysRevE.73.041604 ↗
64. Giovambattista N. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 1372310.1021/jp9018266 ↗
65. Liu K. H. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2013 · 139 · 06450210.1063/1.4817186 ↗
66. Xu S. · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 507610.1021/la804061p ↗
67. Futamura R. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 98110.1039/C1CP22954K ↗
68. Sharma S. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2012 · 109 · 436510.1073/pnas.1116167109 ↗