journal article·2021-04-15

Enhancement of Pseudocapacitive Behavior, Cyclic Performance, and Field Emission Characteristics of Reduced Graphene Oxide Reinforced NiGa2O4 Nanostructured Electrode: A First Principles Calculation to Correlate with Experimental Observation

Subrata Karmakar, Chetan D. Mistari, Afsal S. Shajahan, Mahendra A. More, Brahmananda Chakraborty, Dhrubananda Behera

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 125· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

The rational construction and design of supercapacitors (SCs) with electrochemically favorable structural configuration and appreciable cyclic performances are highly demanding. Herein, a novel Ga-based transition metal oxide, NiGa 2 O 4, was synthesized via sol–gel self-ignition techniques to design an advanced electrode for supercapacitor and field emitter applications. Reitveld refinement of XRD, FTIR, and Raman spectra reveals a larger cubic parameter due to the incorporation of Ga over NiO, which promotes faster charge kinetics and various metal oxide (Ni–O and Ga–O) stretching vibrations in the molecular fingerprint. Reduced graphene oxide (r-GO) with an enlarged surface area has been utilized as a conductive substrate to prevent the aggregation of NiGa 2 O 4 nanoparticles. The NiGa 2 O 4 electrodes exhibit a specific capacitance of 415 F g –1 at a current density of 1.5 A g –1 with capacitance retention of 74.2% at a current density of 20 A g –1, in addition to outstanding cyclic performance over 3000 cycles (capacitance retention = 96.2%). R-GO-reinforced NiGa 2 O 4 electrodes (10:1) possess a higher specific capacitance of 643 F g –1 at a current density of 1.5 A g –1 in comparison to pristine NiGa 2 O 4 with 77.66% retentivity at a current density of 20 A g –1, together with upgraded cyclic stability of 99.1% retentivity over 3000 cycles. The NiGa 2 O 4 /rGO field emitter delivers a low turn-on field of 4.42 V/μm@1 μA/cm 2 with a long field emission current stability of over 5 h in comparison to pristine NiGa 2 O 4 (turn-on field of 6.56 V/μm@1 μA/cm 2 ), which recommends it as a potential field emitter (FE) for vacuum micro- and nanoelectronics. Various FE parameters with field enhancement factor (β) are compared with those of other efficient field emitters. Experimental data were supported through theoretical insight from density functional theory (DFT) simulations. Enhanced quantum capacitance and increased density of states near the Fermi level contribute toward superior charge storage performance in r-GO-reinforced NiGa 2 O 4 compared to pristine NiGa 2 O 4 . The interaction between NiGa 2 O 4 and rGO involves charge transfer from NiGa 2 O 4 to the C 2p orbital. In addition, the reduction in work function for the hybrid structure justifies its improved field emission properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advancements in Battery Materials · MXene and MAX Phase Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Astronomy, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela 769008, Odisha, India

Department of Physics, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India

High Pressure & Synchroton Radiation Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India

Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400094, India

Funding

Ministry of Human Resource Development

References (82)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20120533210.1002/adma.201205332 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20150354310.1002/adma.201503543 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.6b0187910.1021/acsami.6b01879 ↗
4. 10.1038/3510464410.1038/35104644 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat136810.1038/nmat1368 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.288.5465.49410.1126/science.288.5465.494 ↗
7. 10.1039/C4CS00116H10.1039/C4CS00116H ↗
8. 10.1126/science.287.5453.62210.1126/science.287.5453.622 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.00710.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.007 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.03010.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.030 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20030443410.1002/adfm.200304434 ↗
12. 10.1039/C5TA06812F10.1039/C5TA06812F ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12624110.1016/j.cej.2020.126241 ↗
14. 10.1039/D0NR02642E10.1039/D0NR02642E ↗
15. 10.1039/C9NR09108D10.1039/C9NR09108D ↗
16. 10.1039/D0SE00909A10.1039/D0SE00909A ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.05.02110.1016/j.ssi.2004.05.021 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b0538410.1021/acsami.7b05384 ↗
19. 10.1039/C7TA00469A10.1039/C7TA00469A ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b2158110.1021/acsami.8b21581 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.7b0727710.1021/acsami.7b07277 ↗
22. 10.5229/JKES.2009.12.2.18910.5229/JKES.2009.12.2.189 ↗
23. 10.1149/2.007201eel10.1149/2.007201eel ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.01710.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.017 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.03210.1016/j.apcatb.2015.09.032 ↗
26. 10.1021/cg800516210.1021/cg8005162 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.07110.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.071 ↗
28. Fursey, G. Field Emission in Vacuum Microelectronics; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, 2005; p 205.
29. 10.1126/science.270.5239.117910.1126/science.270.5239.1179 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.343163010.1063/1.3431630 ↗
31. 10.1002/smll.20130000210.1002/smll.201300002 ↗
32. 10.1002/cplu.20140227910.1002/cplu.201402279 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
35. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
39. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
40. 10.1021/cg800516210.1021/cg8005162 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0087510.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00875 ↗
42. 10.1088/1757-899X/338/1/01205510.1088/1757-899X/338/1/012055 ↗
43. Hosterman, B. D. Raman Spectroscopic Study of Solid Solution Spinel Oxides. UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones; 2011, 1087, 1–144.
44. 10.1016/0584-8539(67)80023-010.1016/0584-8539(67)80023-0 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jssc.2019.12101310.1016/j.jssc.2019.121013 ↗
46. 10.1002/aenm.20140140110.1002/aenm.201401401 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.06410.1016/j.cej.2018.06.064 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.23710.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.237 ↗
49. 10.1002/chem.20200024310.1002/chem.202000243 ↗
50. 10.1039/C5RA17011G10.1039/C5RA17011G ↗
51. 10.1039/C8NJ00515J10.1039/C8NJ00515J ↗
52. 10.1039/C8DT02319K10.1039/C8DT02319K ↗
53. 10.1039/C8QI00121A10.1039/C8QI00121A ↗
54. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.14310.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.143 ↗
55. 10.1039/C8RA09128E10.1039/C8RA09128E ↗
56. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.01510.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.015 ↗
57. 10.1039/C5RA27931C10.1039/C5RA27931C ↗
58. 10.1039/C7DT03815A10.1039/C7DT03815A ↗
59. 10.1098/rspa.1928.009110.1098/rspa.1928.0091 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.496131210.1063/1.4961312 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.02010.1016/j.jpcs.2018.02.020 ↗
62. 10.1088/2053-1591/2/9/09501110.1088/2053-1591/2/9/095011 ↗
63. 10.1002/pssa.20190074110.1002/pssa.201900741 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.10946210.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109462 ↗
65. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab523a10.1088/1361-6463/ab523a ↗
66. 10.1063/1.512399710.1063/1.5123997 ↗
67. 10.1021/ic500200a10.1021/ic500200a ↗
68. 10.1039/C7TA05493A10.1039/C7TA05493A ↗
69. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b0513210.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05132 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0529110.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05291 ↗
71. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0447810.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04478 ↗
72. Arnaldsen, A.; Tang, W.; Henkelman, G. Bader Charge Analysis; http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/henkelman/code/bader/.
73. 10.3390/ma908061510.3390/ma9080615 ↗
74. 10.1021/cs400080w10.1021/cs400080w ↗
75. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.09010.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.090 ↗
76. 10.1039/C9SE00216B10.1039/C9SE00216B ↗
77. 10.1088/1742-6596/619/1/01200910.1088/1742-6596/619/1/012009 ↗
78. 10.1039/C3EE42963F10.1039/C3EE42963F ↗
79. 10.1021/nn100551j10.1021/nn100551j ↗
80. 10.1063/1.490811410.1063/1.4908114 ↗
81. 10.1021/jp512176r10.1021/jp512176r ↗
82. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0593010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05930 ↗