Evaluation of the Overall Crystalline Quality of Amorphous Carbon Containing Multiwalled Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
A set of nanotubes with moderate contents of amorphous phases (0.4–5.1 wt %) are systematically investigated by Raman spectroscopy, kinetic thermal analysis, and complementary techniques. Results show that, in spite of their small amount, the presence of amorphous phases has a strong impact on the oxidation path of nanotubes. The apparent activation energy for oxidizing them, as inferred from thermal kinetic analysis, decreases linearly with increasing the content of amorphous species. The presence of non-sp 2 defects causes the failure of the commonly adopted Raman graphitization indexes, with consequent breakdown of the correlations between crystalline quality and activation energy evidenced in the absence of the amorphous phases. This drawback is overcome by introducing a generalized Raman indicator of the crystalline quality, whose value increases with increasing energy needed for oxidizing nanotubes independently on the typology (sp 2 or non-sp 2 ) of defects present in their walls.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, dell’Energia, dell’Ambiente e dei Materiali (DICEAM), Università “Mediterranea”, Loc. Feo di Vito, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Istituto per i Processi Chimico-Fisici, Sezione di Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres 37, 98158 Messina, Italy
Dipartimento di Chimica Industriale ed Ingegneria dei Materiali, Università di Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno d’Alcontres 31, 98166 Messina, Italy
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Robertson J. · Mater. Today · 2004 · 7 · 4610.1016/S1369-7021(04)00448-1 ↗
2. Javey A. · 2009
3. Hirlekar R. · Asian J. Pharm. Clin. Res. · 2009 · 2 · 17
4. Wang X. · J. Power Sources · 2006 · 158 · 15410.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.09.039 ↗
5. Kar K. K. · 2011
6. Eklund P. · 2007
7. Núñez J. D. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 248310.1016/j.carbon.2011.02.018 ↗
8. Qian Y. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 256 · 403810.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.074 ↗
9. Dresselhaus M. S. · 2001 · 8010.1007/3-540-39947-X ↗
10. Zhong G. · Chem. Vap. Deposition · 2004 · 10 · 12510.1002/cvde.200304168 ↗
11. Zhong G. F. · Chem. Vap. Deposition · 2005 · 11 · 12710.1002/cvde.200404197 ↗
12. Santangelo S. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2010 · 19 · 59910.1016/j.diamond.2009.10.001 ↗
13. Lehman J. H. · Carbon · 2011 · 49 · 258110.1016/j.carbon.2011.03.028 ↗
14. Di Leo R. A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 06430710.1063/1.2712152 ↗
15. Santangelo S. · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2011 · 42 · 59310.1002/jrs.2766 ↗
16. Santangelo S. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 12 · 478610.1166/jnn.2012.4889 ↗
17. Robertson J. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2009 · 18 · 95710.1016/j.diamond.2009.02.008 ↗
18. Lanza M. · ChemPhysChem. · 2010 · 11 · 192510.1002/cphc.200900996 ↗
19. Nicholas J. F. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1959 · 31 · 92210.1063/1.1730550 ↗
20. Faggio G. · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2012 · 43 · 76110.1002/jrs.3089 ↗
21. Ferrari A. C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 61 · 1409510.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095 ↗
22. Cançado L. G. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 319010.1021/nl201432g ↗
23. Dresselhaus M. S. · Phys. Rep. · 2005 · 409 · 4710.1016/j.physrep.2004.10.006 ↗
24. Cançado L. G. · Carbon · 2008 · 46 · 27210.1016/j.carbon.2007.11.015 ↗
25. Kim Y. A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 380 · 31910.1016/j.cplett.2003.09.027 ↗
26. Osswald S. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 152510.1021/cm052755g ↗
27. Juang Z. Y. · Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2004 · 13 · 214010.1016/j.diamond.2004.03.007 ↗
28. Yu Z. · Catal. Today · 2005 · 100 · 26110.1016/j.cattod.2004.09.060 ↗
29. Lin M. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 44910.1021/nl052356k ↗
30. Hofmann S. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 60210.1021/nl0624824 ↗
31. Lin M. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 223410.1021/nl070681x ↗
32. Halonen N. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 672310.1021/jp7110617 ↗
33. Wirth C. T. · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 356010.1021/nn900613e ↗
34. Kim S. M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 91810.1021/jz9004762 ↗
35. Kumar M. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 10 · 373910.1166/jnn.2010.2939 ↗
36. Qian W. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2003 · 118 · 87810.1063/1.1527897 ↗
37. Ajayan P. M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 143710.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1437 ↗
38. Jeet K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 03430210.1063/1.3466774 ↗
39. Gupta S. · J. Raman Spectrosc. · 2009 · 40 · 112710.1002/jrs.2245 ↗
40. Tuinstra F. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1970 · 53 · 112610.1063/1.1674108 ↗
41. Chen J. · Carbon · 2007 · 45 · 27410.1016/j.carbon.2006.09.028 ↗
42. Delhaes P. · Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 300510.1016/j.carbon.2006.05.021 ↗