journal article·2023-08-31

Crystal Structure, Microstructure, Magnetic Properties, and Dielectric Properties of Dy3+ Substituted Co–Ni Mixed Ferrite

Abhijeet V. Dhotre, Tulshidas C. Darvade, Chaitali V. Khedkar, Keerthi Haritha, Shivaji S. Veer, Yesh D. Kolekar, C. V. Ramana

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 127· Issue 34
Publisher page

Abstract

A comparative and exploration study of intrinsic, rare-earth (RE) and rare-earth and transition-metal (TM) cosubstituted cobalt ferrite (CoFe 2 O 4; CFO) materials has been performed by studying their crystal growth, phase-stability, morphology, magnetic, and electrical properties comprehensively. Pristine cobalt ferrite (CoFe 2 O 4 ), RE-ion (Dy 3+ ) substituted CFO (CoFe 1.95 Dy 0.05 O 4; RE-CFO), and TM-RE (nickel/dysprosium; Ni 2+ /Dy 3+ ) cosubstituted CFO (Co 1– x Ni x Fe 1.95 Dy 0.05 O 4; x = 0.1, 0.5; RE-TM-CFO) samples were synthesized by a standard solid-state reaction method. X-ray diffraction (XRD) together with Rietveld refinement confirms the formation of the anticipated phase, which corresponds to the space group Fd 3̅ m (227), along with the presence of a small impurity phase (DyFeO 3 ) in the samples where Dy 3+ was substituted. Surface morphology studies by means of scanning electron microscopy specifies the consequence of Ni 2+ /Dy 3+ on the microstructure as well as the presence of the orthoferrite phase of DyFeO 3 at the grain boundaries. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analyses indicate that the specific surface area and pore contribution increases, whereas the pore width decreases for Dy-substitution in Co–Ni mixed composition, i.e., Co 1– x Ni x Fe 1.95 Dy 0.05 O 4; x = 0.5. Magnetization ( M ) versus magnetic field ( H ) measurements at variable temperature (5–400 K) confirm the ferrimagnetic nature of all the CFO, RE-CFO, and TM-RE-CFO samples. Saturation magnetization ( M s ), coercive field ( H c ), and remnant magnetization ( M r ) are observed to be decreased with Ni 2+ /Dy 3+ substitution. However, the cubic anisotropy does not follow a systematic trend. A maximum magnetostriction coefficient λ 11 = −103 ppm is attained for Co 0.9 Ni 0.1 Fe 1.95 Dy 0.05 O 4 along with the strain derivative dλ/d H = 0.1108 ppm/Oe at a lesser magnetic field of 500 Oe, making it one of the best candidates for a stress or magnetic field sensing application. Moreover, this sample may be suitable as one of the constituent phases in magneto-electric materials. The dielectric constant dispersion measurements as a function of frequency revealed the typical dielectric behavior of the ferrites. Concurrently, the presence of a single semicircle arc in the complex impedance study confirms that only grains are contributing to the conduction mechanism. Furthermore, as expected, temperature-dependent complex impedance measurements show a decrease of grain resistance ( R g ) and relaxation time (τ), whereas the grain capacitance ( C g ) is observed to be enhanced. Overall, the results point to the outcome and highlight the TM-RE mixed CFO (Co 0.9 Ni 0.1 Fe 1.95 Dy 0.05 O 4 ) is suitable for designing the magneto-mechanical devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, Arts, Science and Commerce College, Indapur, Pune413106, India

Ferroic Material Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune 411 007, India

Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, 500 W. Univ. Ave., El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Centre for Advanced Materials Research (CMR), University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, United States

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India · Division of Materials Research · Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Research and Training Institute

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0312510.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03125 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jre.2019.09.01110.1016/j.jre.2019.09.011 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ssc.2022.11501610.1016/j.ssc.2022.115016 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16955010.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169550 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.physb.2021.41316110.1016/j.physb.2021.413161 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10948-021-05854-610.1007/s10948-021-05854-6 ↗
7. 10.3390/nano1106156010.3390/nano11061560 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.500551910.1063/1.5005519 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mseb.2023.11636310.1016/j.mseb.2023.116363 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.03544610.1103/PhysRevB.102.035446 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.482741610.1063/1.4827416 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.511481510.1063/1.5114815 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsomega.9b0249210.1021/acsomega.9b02492 ↗
14. 10.1155/2012/59183910.1155/2012/591839 ↗
15. 10.1515/ntrev-2017-013810.1515/ntrev-2017-0138 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.140 ↗
17. Jauhar S. · 2016 · 97694
18. 10.1007/s12598-019-01285-410.1007/s12598-019-01285-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.00810.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.008 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1TC05980G10.1039/D1TC05980G ↗
21. 10.12693/APhysPolA.140.1410.12693/APhysPolA.140.14 ↗
22. 10.1109/LMAG.2021.312094210.1109/LMAG.2021.3120942 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.12910.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.129 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.12.04810.1016/j.jmmm.2012.12.048 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.14210.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.142 ↗
26. 10.1080/16583655.2020.181638910.1080/16583655.2020.1816389 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1118810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11188 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.50910.1103/PhysRevLett.10.509 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.physb.2021.41284910.1016/j.physb.2021.412849 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.04.08910.1016/j.jmmm.2015.04.089 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.16857710.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168577 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.physb.2020.41213610.1016/j.physb.2020.412136 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10854-018-9602-210.1007/s10854-018-9602-2 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.36232810.1063/1.362328 ↗
35. Cullity B. D. · 1994
36. 10.1063/1.480243510.1063/1.4802435 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10948-020-05733-610.1007/s10948-020-05733-6 ↗
38. 10.1007/s10948-020-05443-z10.1007/s10948-020-05443-z ↗
39. 10.1007/s10948-011-1347-610.1007/s10948-011-1347-6 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.17240110.1103/PhysRevB.77.172401 ↗
41. 10.1039/C2JM15228B10.1039/C2JM15228B ↗
42. 10.1021/am302053q10.1021/am302053q ↗
43. Smit J. · 1965
44. Jiles D. · 201510.1201/b18948 ↗
45. Thoelke, J. B. Magnetization and Magnetostriction in Highly Magnetostrictive Materials. MS Thesis, Iowa State University, 1993.10.2172/10190712 ↗
46. 10.1021/am302053q10.1021/am302053q ↗
47. 10.1063/1.240164810.1063/1.2401648 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jics.2022.10059910.1016/j.jics.2022.100599 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.487023210.1063/1.4870232 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRev.83.12110.1103/PhysRev.83.121 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.02310.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.023 ↗
52. 10.1088/0964-1726/18/8/08501410.1088/0964-1726/18/8/085014 ↗
53. 10.1002/recl.1936055060810.1002/recl.19360550608 ↗
54. 10.1007/s10854-016-6212-810.1007/s10854-016-6212-8 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.14010.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.140 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp106086410.1021/jp1060864 ↗
57. 10.1557/jmr.2010.3710.1557/jmr.2010.37 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2016.03.01510.1016/j.jpcs.2016.03.015 ↗