Understanding the compositional control on electrical, mechanical, optical, and physical properties of inorganic glasses with interpretable machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Despite the use of inorganic glasses for more than 4500 years, the composition–property relationships in these materials remain poorly understood. Here, exploiting largescale experimental data and machine learning, we develop composition–property models for twenty five properties, which are interpreted using game-theoretic concepts. Specifically, we use a dataset consisting of ∼275,000 glass compositions comprising of 221 different components and 25 properties. This is by far the largest model developed in the literature. The analysis reveals that the glass components, such as network formers, modifiers, and intermediates, play distinct roles in governing the optical, physical, electrical, and mechanical properties of glasses. Interestingly, these components exhibit interdependence, the magnitude of which is different for different properties. While the physical origins of some of these interdependencies could be explained using known phenomena, the majority of the remaining ones remain to be explored. Thus, our work paves the way for decoding the “glass genome”, which can provide the recipe for discovering novel glasses while also shedding light on the fundamental factors governing the composition–structure–property relationships.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Phase-change materials and chalcogenides · Pigment Synthesis and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Grand challenges in glass science
2. Two centuries of glass research: historical trends, current status, and grand challenges for the future10.1111/ijag.12087 ↗
3. Varshneya · 2019
4. The atomic arrangement in glass10.1021/ja01349a006 ↗
5. Bioactive glasses—structure and properties10.1002/anie.201405310 ↗
6. Glass fracture upon ballistic impact: new insights from peridynamics simulations10.3389/fmats.2019.00239 ↗
7. Insight into silicate-glass corrosion mechanisms10.1038/nmat2301 ↗
8. Current state of knowledge of nuclear waste glass corrosion mechanisms: the case of R7T7 glass10.1016/S0883-2927(09)80060-7 ↗
9. Dissolution rate of borosilicate glass SON68: a method of quantification based upon interferometry and implications for experimental and natural weathering rates of glass10.1016/j.gca.2015.02.037 ↗
10. Elucidating the influence of structure and Ag+-Na+ ion-exchange on crack-resistance and ionic conductivity of Na3Al1.8Si1.65P1.8O12 glass electrolyte10.1016/j.actamat.2022.117745 ↗
11. Ionic conductivity of Na 3 Al 2 P 3 O 12 glass electrolytes—role of charge compensators10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c01280 ↗
12. Topological constraints and rigidity of network glasses from molecular dynamics simulations
13. Accelerating the design of functional glasses through modeling10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01054 ↗
14. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in glass science and technology: 21 challenges for the 21st century10.1111/ijag.15881 ↗
15. Machine learning for glass science and engineering: a review10.1016/j.nocx.2019.100036 ↗
16. Model-driven design of bioactive glasses: from molecular dynamics through machine learning10.1080/09506608.2019.1694779 ↗
17. Glass property databases: their history, present state, and prospects for further development10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.39-40.147 ↗
18. Predicting Young's modulus of oxide glasses with sparse datasets using machine learning10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119643 ↗
19. Predicting the Young's modulus of silicate glasses using high-throughput molecular dynamics simulations and machine learning10.1038/s41598-019-45344-3 ↗
20. Deep learning aided rational design of oxide glasses10.1039/D0MH00162G ↗
21. Scalable Gaussian processes for predicting the optical, physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of inorganic glasses with large datasets10.1039/D0MA00764A ↗
22. Predicting the dissolution kinetics of silicate glasses using machine learning10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.02.023 ↗
23. Predicting radioactive waste glass dissolution with machine learning10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119852 ↗
24. Machine learning as a tool to design glasses with controlled dissolution for healthcare applications10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.037 ↗
25. Predicting the dissolution kinetics of silicate glasses by topology-informed machine learning10.1038/s41529-019-0094-1 ↗
26. E. Alcobaça, S.M. Mastelini, T. Botari, B.A. Pimentel, D.R. Cassar, A.C.P.D.L.F. de Carvalho, E.D. Zanotto, Explainable machine learning algorithms for predicting glass transition temperatures, Acta Mater. 188 (2020) 92100, doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.047.10.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.047 ↗
27. A machine learning approach to the estimation of the liquidus temperature of glass-forming oxide blends10.1016/S0022-3093(02)01859-8 ↗
28. Predicting boron coordination in multicomponent borate and borosilicate glasses using analytical models and machine learning
29. Designing optical glasses by machine learning coupled with a genetic algorithm10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.167 ↗
30. Predicting and interpreting oxide glass properties by machine learning using large datasets10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.105 ↗
31. Interpreting the optical properties of oxide glasses with machine learning and Shapely additive explanations10.1111/jace.18345 ↗
32. Hybrid machine learning/physics-based approach for predicting oxide glass-forming ability10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117432 ↗
33. Interpretable machine learning
34. A new transferable interatomic potential for molecular dynamics simulations of borosilicate glasses10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.04.063 ↗
35. Extracting processing and testing parameters from materials science literature for improved property prediction of glasses
36. epam/SciGlass, (n.d.). https://github.com/epam/SciGlass (accessed April 8, 2020).
37. INTERGLAD Ver. 7, (n.d.). https://www.newglass.jp/interglad_n/gaiyo/outline_e.html (accessed December 14, 2020).
38. Looking through glass: knowledge discovery from materials science literature using natural language processing10.1016/j.patter.2021.100290 ↗
39. Visualizing data using t-SNE
40. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system
41. Bagging predictors10.1023/A:1018054314350 ↗
42. Stochastic gradient boosting10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
43. Hastie · 2009
44. Breiman · 1984
45. Optuna: a next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework
46. Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies10.1162/106365601750190398 ↗
47. Taking the human out of the loop: a review of bayesian optimization10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218 ↗
48. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization
49. Non-stochastic best arm identification and hyperparameter optimization, in: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics
50. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions
51. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
52. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0 ↗
53. Correlation between dielectric constant and chemical structure of sodium silicate glasses10.1063/1.363824 ↗
54. Ion exchange strengthening and thermal expansion of glasses: common origin and critical role of network connectivity10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.10.027 ↗
55. The distribution of aluminum in the tetrahedra of silicates and aluminates
56. Optical properties of glasses
57. Structure and ionic transport of superionic conducting glasses in the system AgI⌷Ag2O⌷MoO310.1016/0022-3093(80)90433-0 ↗
58. Mixed-modifier effect in (Ca,Mg) metaphosphate glasses10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.04.036 ↗