journal article·2011-10-13

Free-Energy Simulations of Hydrogen Bonding versus Stacking of Nucleobases on a Graphene Surface

Vojtěch Spiwok, Pavel Hobza, Jan Řezáč

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 115· Issue 40
Publisher page

Abstract

It has been demonstrated by molecular modeling and experiments that free nucleic acid bases form hydrogen-bonded complexes in vacuum but prefer π–π stacking in partially and fully solvated systems. Here we show using molecular dynamics simulations and metadynamics that the addition of a surface (in this case a nanographene monolayer) reverts the situation from stacking back to hydrogen bonding. Watson–Crick as well as several non-Watson–Crick base pairs lying on a graphene surface are significantly more stable in a water environment than a π–π–π-stacked graphene–base–base assembly. It illustrates that the thermodynamics of nucleobase interactions results from a fine balance among hydrogen bonding, stacking, and solvation, and that these effects must be considered in molecular design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry · Surface Chemistry and Catalysis · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Technicka 3, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic

Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Center for Biomolecules and Complex Molecular Systems, Flemingovo nám. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic

Regional Centre of Advanced Technologies and Materials, Department of Physical Chemistry, Palacky University, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. Watson J. D. · Nature · 1953 · 171 · 73710.1038/171737a0 ↗
2. Jurečka P. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 1560810.1021/ja036611j ↗
3. Černý J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1605510.1021/ja805428q ↗
4. Kabeláč M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2001 · 105 · 580410.1021/jp0104886 ↗
5. Kabeláč M. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2001 · 7 · 206710.1002/1521-3765(20010518)7:10<2067::AID-CHEM2067>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
6. Kabeláč M. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1220610.1021/jp045970d ↗
7. Nir E. · Nature · 2000 · 408 · 94910.1038/35050053 ↗
8. Yanson I. K. · Biopolymers · 1979 · 18 · 114910.1002/bip.1979.360180510 ↗
9. Geim A. K. · Science · 2009 · 324 · 153010.1126/science.1158877 ↗
10. Heckl W. M. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 1991 · 88 · 800310.1073/pnas.88.18.8003 ↗
11. Srinivasan R. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 877010.1021/j100136a020 ↗
12. Tao N. J. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1994 · 98 · 146410.1021/j100056a016 ↗
13. Freund J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 55 · 539410.1103/PhysRevB.55.5394 ↗
14. Sowerby S. J. · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 1997 · 433 · 8510.1016/S0022-0728(97)00085-5 ↗
15. Uchihashi T. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 830910.1103/PhysRevB.60.8309 ↗
16. Sowerby S. J. · Origins Life Evol. Biospheres · 2000 · 30 · 8110.1023/A:1006616725062 ↗
17. Husale S. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1807810.1021/la102518t ↗
18. Antony J. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 10 · 272210.1039/b718788b ↗
19. Laio A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2002 · 99 · 1256210.1073/pnas.202427399 ↗
20. Iannuzzi M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 23830210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.238302 ↗
21. Laio A. · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2008 · 71 · 12660110.1088/0034-4885/71/12/126601 ↗
22. van der Spoel D. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2005 · 26 · 170110.1002/jcc.20291 ↗
23. Bonomi M. · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 196110.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011 ↗
24. Duan Y. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2003 · 24 · 199910.1002/jcc.10349 ↗
25. Wang J. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2004 · 25 · 115710.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
26. Wang J. · J. Mol. Graphics Modell. · 2006 · 25 · 24710.1016/j.jmgm.2005.12.005 ↗
27. Gasteiger J. · Tetrahedron · 1980 · 36 · 321910.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 ↗
28. Jorgensen W. L. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1983 · 79 · 92610.1063/1.445869 ↗
29. Porezag D. · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1294710.1103/PhysRevB.51.12947 ↗
30. Seifert G. · Int. J. Quantum Chem. · 1996 · 58 · 18510.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1996)58:2<185::AID-QUA7>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
31. Elstner M. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2001 · 114 · 514910.1063/1.1329889 ↗
32. Riley K. E. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 502310.1021/cr1000173 ↗
33. Černý J. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2007 · 111 · 114610.1021/jp066504m ↗
34. Marenich A. V. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2009 · 113 · 637810.1021/jp810292n ↗
35. Aradi B. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2007 · 111 · 567810.1021/jp070186p ↗
36. Ahlrichs R. · 2006
37. Frisch M. J. · 2004
38. Hobza P. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1997 · 18 · 113610.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19970715)18:9<1136::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
39. Grimme S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1119910.1021/jp0720791 ↗
40. Kong L. M. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 2161810.1021/jp108616h ↗
41. de Jong D. H. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2011 · 32 · 191910.1002/jcc.21776 ↗
42. Zheng M. · Science · 2003 · 302 · 154510.1126/science.1091911 ↗
43. Zheng M. · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 33810.1038/nmat877 ↗
44. Martin W. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 1607610.1021/jp8040567 ↗
45. Garaj S. · Nature · 2010 · 467 · 19010.1038/nature09379 ↗
46. Schneider G. F. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 316310.1021/nl102069z ↗
47. Merchant C. A. · Nano Lett. · 2010 · 10 · 291510.1021/nl101046t ↗