journal article·2012-01-12

Are Pentacene Monolayer and Thin-Film Polymorphs Really Substrate-Induced? A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Study

Makoto Yoneya, Masahiro Kawasaki, Masahiko Ando

Publisher page

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations were performed for mono- and multilayer pentacene films on a simple model surface to study polymorphs of the deposition-processed thin-films. The layer-by-layer deposition history was taken into account by successive layer-stacking simulations of monolayer, bilayer and up to five-layered systems. We found that the tilt-free monolayer polymorph and the molecular tilting upon stacking layers on this monolayer were realized in the simulations even without any substrate interactions. These results imply that neither the monolayer nor the small angle tilted thin-film polymorph is substrate-induced as commonly explained. Our results also show a crucial dependence on the layer stacking history for the thin-film polymorph, which indicate that the thin-film polymorph would be induced with the layering history starting from the tilt-free monolayer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Surface Chemistry and Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanosystem Research Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba 305-8568, Japan

Hitachi Cambridge Laboratory, Hitachi Europe Ltd., J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Mattheus C. · Synth. Met. · 2003 · 138 · 47510.1016/S0379-6779(02)00467-8 ↗
2. Duffy C. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 725210.1021/cm801689f ↗
3. Natsume Y. · Synth. Met. · 2009 · 159 · 33810.1016/j.synthmet.2008.09.007 ↗
4. Campbell R. · Acta Crystallogr. · 1962 · 15 · 28910.1107/S0365110X62000699 ↗
5. Siegrist T. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 207910.1002/adma.200602072 ↗
6. Bouchoms I. · Synth. Met. · 1999 · 104 · 17510.1016/S0379-6779(99)00050-8 ↗
7. Mannsfeld S. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 229410.1002/adma.200803328 ↗
8. Drummy L. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 90310.1002/adma.200400189 ↗
9. Goose J. E. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1565310.1021/jp074124a ↗
10. Della Valle R. · ChemPhysChem · 2009 · 10 · 178310.1002/cphc.200900084 ↗
11. Yoneya M. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 1039710.1039/c0jm01577f ↗
12. Wang J. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2004 · 25 · 115710.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
13. Bayly C. I. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1993 · 97 · 1026910.1021/j100142a004 ↗
14. Frisch, M. J.Gaussian03, Revision C.02; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford CT, 2004.
15. Steele W. · Surf. Sci. · 1973 · 36 · 31710.1016/0039-6028(73)90264-1 ↗
16. Pinilla C. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 1792210.1021/jp052999o ↗
17. Lindahl E. · J. Mol. Model. · 2001 · 7 · 30610.1007/s008940100045 ↗
18. Hess B. · J. Comput. Chem. · 1997 · 18 · 146310.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12<1463::AID-JCC4>3.0.CO;2-H ↗
19. Nosé S. · Mol. Phys. · 1984 · 52 · 25510.1080/00268978400101201 ↗
20. Hoover W. · Phys. Rev. A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
21. Parrinello M. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 718210.1063/1.328693 ↗
22. Fritz S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 408410.1021/ja049726b ↗
23. Burke S. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 423101
24. Yoshida H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 18193010.1063/1.2736193 ↗
25. Schiefer S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 1031610.1021/ja0730516 ↗
26. Yoshida H. · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 77 · 23520510.1103/PhysRevB.77.235205 ↗