Interaction of CO with Oxygen Adatoms on TiO2(110)
Source abstract
Abstract
The interaction between CO and O adsorbed on TiO 2 (110) has been investigated using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), electron stimulated desorption (ESD), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), and density functional theory (DFT). Coadsorption of CO and O produces CO−O and CO−O−CO surface complexes via weak attractive interaction as revealed by STM and DFT. The effect of the adsorbates interaction can also be observed in two ensemble-averaged techniques, ESD and TPD, strongly supporting the STM and DFT results. The CO molecules adsorbed near chemisorbed O cause a ∼70% decrease in the O + ion yield in ESD. The interaction between CO and O is considered to be electrostatic in nature due to the charge rearrangement upon chemisorption.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, United States
URS, P.O. Box 618, South Park, Pennsylvania 15129, United States
Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Henrich V. E. · 1994
2. Fujishima A. · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
3. Diebold U. · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2003 · 48 · 5310.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0 ↗
4. Linsebigler A. L. · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 73510.1021/cr00035a013 ↗
5. Thompson T. L. · Chem. Rev. · 2006 · 106 · 442810.1021/cr050172k ↗
6. Dohnálek Z. · Prog. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 85 · 16110.1016/j.progsurf.2010.03.001 ↗
7. Dohnálek Z. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 622910.1021/jp0564905 ↗
8. Green I. X. · Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1192410.1021/jp103574t ↗
9. Henderson M. A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 532810.1021/jp990655q ↗
10. Kimmel G. A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 19610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.196102 ↗
11. Epling W. S. · Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 412 · 33310.1016/S0039-6028(98)00446-4 ↗
12. Wendt S. · Science · 2008 · 320 · 175510.1126/science.1159846 ↗
13. Wang Z. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1822210.1021/jp1059165 ↗
14. Lee J. · Phys Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 08140810.1103/PhysRevB.79.081408 ↗
15. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1311510.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
16. Perdew J. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
17. Monkhorst H. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
18. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
19. Wendt S. · Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 598 · 22610.1016/j.susc.2005.08.041 ↗
20. Du Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 09610210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096102 ↗
21. Zhao Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 795810.1021/ja902259k ↗
22. Du Y. G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 66610.1021/jp807030n ↗
23. Du Y. G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 264910.1021/jp077677u ↗
24. Zhang Z. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 305910.1021/jp910358w ↗
25. Diebold U. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 111610.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1116 ↗
26. Linsebigler A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 103 · 943810.1063/1.470005 ↗