journal article·2011-03-17Open access

Interaction of CO with Oxygen Adatoms on TiO2(110)

Junseok Lee, Zhen Zhang, Xingyi Deng, Dan C. Sorescu, Christopher Matranga, John T. Yates

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 115· Issue 10

Abstract

The interaction between CO and O adsorbed on TiO 2 (110) has been investigated using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), electron stimulated desorption (ESD), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), and density functional theory (DFT). Coadsorption of CO and O produces CO−O and CO−O−CO surface complexes via weak attractive interaction as revealed by STM and DFT. The effect of the adsorbates interaction can also be observed in two ensemble-averaged techniques, ESD and TPD, strongly supporting the STM and DFT results. The CO molecules adsorbed near chemisorbed O cause a ∼70% decrease in the O + ion yield in ESD. The interaction between CO and O is considered to be electrostatic in nature due to the charge rearrangement upon chemisorption.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Energy Technology Laboratory, Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15236, United States

URS, P.O. Box 618, South Park, Pennsylvania 15129, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Henrich V. E. · 1994
2. Fujishima A. · Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
3. Diebold U. · Surf. Sci. Rep. · 2003 · 48 · 5310.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0 ↗
4. Linsebigler A. L. · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 73510.1021/cr00035a013 ↗
5. Thompson T. L. · Chem. Rev. · 2006 · 106 · 442810.1021/cr050172k ↗
6. Dohnálek Z. · Prog. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 85 · 16110.1016/j.progsurf.2010.03.001 ↗
7. Dohnálek Z. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 622910.1021/jp0564905 ↗
8. Green I. X. · Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1192410.1021/jp103574t ↗
9. Henderson M. A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 1999 · 103 · 532810.1021/jp990655q ↗
10. Kimmel G. A. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 19610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.196102 ↗
11. Epling W. S. · Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 412 · 33310.1016/S0039-6028(98)00446-4 ↗
12. Wendt S. · Science · 2008 · 320 · 175510.1126/science.1159846 ↗
13. Wang Z. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1822210.1021/jp1059165 ↗
14. Lee J. · Phys Rev. B · 2009 · 79 · 08140810.1103/PhysRevB.79.081408 ↗
15. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1311510.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
16. Perdew J. P. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
17. Monkhorst H. J. · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
18. Kresse G. · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
19. Wendt S. · Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 598 · 22610.1016/j.susc.2005.08.041 ↗
20. Du Y. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 09610210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096102 ↗
21. Zhao Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 795810.1021/ja902259k ↗
22. Du Y. G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 66610.1021/jp807030n ↗
23. Du Y. G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 264910.1021/jp077677u ↗
24. Zhang Z. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 305910.1021/jp910358w ↗
25. Diebold U. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 111610.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1116 ↗
26. Linsebigler A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1995 · 103 · 943810.1063/1.470005 ↗