Yielding and shear banding of metallic glasses
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study the yielding and subsequent shear banding evolution process of Zr-, Cu-, Fe- and Mg-based metallic glasses (MGs) were investigated using carefully designed cyclic microcompression tests. It was found that yielding starts from a stable plastic flow with a viscosity of the order of 1012 Pa s, resembling that of the glass transition. This provides critical evidence that yielding is caused by a stress-induced glass transition with internal randomly distributed liquid-like cores get connected. Up to a critical point the liquidized layer penetrates the entire sample with an initiation viscosity of 108 Pa s, comparable with that of the liquid-like cores. Along the liquid-like layer shear band propagation involves shear band sliding and is succeeded by shear band arrest. Dynamic softening leads to an increase in the velocity of shear band sliding, with resultant shear offset, which can be successfully captured by a linear softening model. Once the elastic energy in the shear band is dissipated its internal structure begins to recover, with the solid-like matrix being reconstructed, resulting in shear band arrest. A simple diagram elucidating the yielding and shear banding dynamics is constructed, which sheds light on the fundamental nature of the deformation mechanisms of MGs.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Greer · Science · 1995 · 267 · 194710.1126/science.267.5206.1947 ↗
2. Johnson · Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci · 1996 · 1 · 38310.1016/S1359-0286(96)80029-5 ↗
3. Wang · Mater Sci Eng R Rep · 2004 · 44 · 4510.1016/j.mser.2004.03.001 ↗
4. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 224310.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.027 ↗
5. Johnson · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501 ↗
6. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 44510.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130226 ↗
7. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
8. Langer · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 37510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.005 ↗
9. Spaepen · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
10. Argon · Acta Metall · 1979 · 27 · 4710.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 ↗
11. Ye · Nat Mater · 2010 · 9 · 61910.1038/nmat2802 ↗
12. Liu · Intermetallics · 2012 · 26 · 8610.1016/j.intermet.2012.03.052 ↗
13. Liu · Phys Rev Lett · 2009 · 103 · 06550410.1103/PhysRevLett.103.065504 ↗
14. Guan · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 20570110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.205701 ↗
15. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 07190710.1063/1.2336598 ↗
16. Wright · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 463910.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.013 ↗
17. Cao · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 514610.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.016 ↗
18. Yvonne · J Appl Phys · 2012 · 111 · 10352710.1063/1.4717748 ↗
19. Shi · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 38110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.053 ↗
20. Manning · Phys Rev E · 2007 · 76 · 05610610.1103/PhysRevE.76.056106 ↗
21. Song · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 84710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.017 ↗
22. Vinogradov · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 8910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.023 ↗
23. Dalla Torre · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 374210.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.011 ↗
24. Liu · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 99 · 3
25. Yousfi MA, Hajlaoui K, Tourki Z, Yavari AR. J Nanomater; 2011:1–8.10.1155/2011/910962 ↗
26. Maaß · Appl Phys Lett · 2012 · 100 · 07190410.1063/1.3684871 ↗
27. Lewandowski · Philos Mag Lett · 2005 · 85 · 7710.1080/09500830500080474 ↗
28. Zhang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 18110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.043 ↗
29. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 26190510.1063/1.3532968 ↗
30. Liu · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 106 · 4
31. Dmowski · Phy Rev Lett · 2010 · 105 · 20550210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.205502 ↗
32. Henry · J Chem Phys · 1935 · 3 · 10710.1063/1.1749604 ↗
33. Tetyana · J Chem Phys · 2004 · 120 · 1109010.1063/1.1740756 ↗
34. Lu · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 342910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00164-2 ↗
35. Yang · Intermetallics · 2011 · 19 · 100510.1016/j.intermet.2011.03.003 ↗
36. Angell · Science · 1995 · 267 · 192410.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
37. Cohen · Phys Rev B · 1979 · 20 · 107710.1103/PhysRevB.20.1077 ↗
38. Heggen · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 03350610.1063/1.1827344 ↗
39. Li · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 334710.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.024 ↗
40. Furukawa · Nature Mater · 2009 · 8 · 60110.1038/nmat2468 ↗
41. Cao · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 514610.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.016 ↗
42. Yang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 88 · 22191110.1063/1.2206099 ↗
43. Huang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2002 · 50 · 101110.1016/S0022-5096(01)00115-6 ↗
44. Yang · J Mater Sci · 2012 · 47 · 5510.1007/s10853-011-5915-8 ↗
45. Cheng · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 6
46. Busch · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 472510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00122-0 ↗
47. Johnson · MRS Bull · 2007 · 32 · 64410.1557/mrs2007.127 ↗
48. Song · Intermetallics · 2009 · 17 · 76210.1016/j.intermet.2009.03.005 ↗
49. Wright · Mater Trans · 2001 · 42 · 64210.2320/matertrans.42.642 ↗
50. Ye · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 603710.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.029 ↗
51. Wang · Prog Mater Sci · 2012 · 57 · 48710.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.07.001 ↗
52. Zheng · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 54110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.029 ↗
53. Liu · Intermetallics · 2010 · 18 · 145510.1016/j.intermet.2010.03.037 ↗
54. Thompson · Science · 1990 · 250 · 79210.1126/science.250.4982.792 ↗
55. Yoshizawa · J Phys Chem · 1993 · 97 · 1130010.1021/j100145a031 ↗