Selectivity of Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting on TiO2 Anatase Single Crystals
Source abstract
Abstract
The photoelectrochemical behaviors of (101)- and (100)-oriented anatase single crystals were compared in water oxidation in acidic as well as alkaline solutions. Both crystallographic orientations show comparable flat-band potential close to −0.1 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode. The activity of anatase single crystals in water oxidation (at constant bias) decreases with increasing pH. This activity drop demonstrates shift of the photocurrent onset potential in regions close to the point of zero charge. This trend is ascribed to the gradual deprotonation of the surface OH groups and resulting negative surface charge. The activity is further affected by the cations forming the supporting electrolyte—in particular, by their structure-making/breaking abilities. The apparent suppression of the photoelectrochemical water oxidation in alkaline media can be lifted in the presence on oxygen, which shifts the selectivity of the process toward ozone formation. This trend is more pronounced for (101)- than for (100)-oriented anatase, which reflects the role of surface orientation in selectivity control.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
J. Heyrovský Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Dolejškova 3, 18223 Prague, Czech Republic
Funding
Grantov? Agentura Cesk? Republiky
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr500089310.1021/cr5000893 ↗
2. 10.1021/cr500008u10.1021/cr500008u ↗
3. 10.1038/natrevmats.2015.1010.1038/natrevmats.2015.10 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
5. 10.1039/C3CP53653J10.1039/C3CP53653J ↗
6. 10.1038/nmat445110.1038/nmat4451 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.23543110.1103/PhysRevB.92.235431 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.12210.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.122 ↗
9. 10.1038/srep1148210.1038/srep11482 ↗
10. 10.1149/1.139337910.1149/1.1393379 ↗
11. 10.1002/anie.20100605710.1002/anie.201006057 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.06510.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.065 ↗
13. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0200310.1021/acscatal.7b02003 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.123987910.1126/science.1239879 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat169510.1038/nmat1695 ↗
16. 10.1021/ja954172l10.1021/ja954172l ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0928910.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09289 ↗
18. Clesceri, L. S.; Greenberg, A. E.; Eaton, A. D., Eds. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, 1998; p 1325.
19. 10.1002/cctc.20100039710.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
20. 10.1039/C6SC04622C10.1039/C6SC04622C ↗
21. 10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00080-510.1016/S0001-8686(02)00080-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.10.00410.1016/j.jelechem.2010.10.004 ↗
23. 10.1039/C4CP00571F10.1039/C4CP00571F ↗
24. 10.1016/S0301-0104(97)00299-110.1016/S0301-0104(97)00299-1 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.00410.1016/j.elecom.2009.08.004 ↗
26. 10.1021/cr800382810.1021/cr8003828 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0097267710.1007/BF00972677 ↗
28. 10.1038/nchem.157410.1038/nchem.1574 ↗