Photoluminescence of Lead Sulfide Quantum Dots of Different Sizes in a Nanoporous Silicate Glass Matrix
Source abstract
Abstract
The optical properties of lead sulfide quantum dots (QDs) of different sizes embedded in a nanoporous silicate glass matrix (NSM) are investigated by steady-state and transient photoluminescence spectroscopy. The use of this matrix allows the fabrication of samples with reproducible optical characteristics, for both isolated and close-packed QDs. Low-temperature PL analysis of isolated QDs with sizes of 3.7 and 4.5 nm shows that the coefficient of temperature shift of the PL position changes sign with reducing QD size because of size-dependent contributions from thermal expansion, mechanical strain, and electron–phonon coupling. The PL intensity is determined by size-dependent splitting of the lowest energy electronic state.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials · Carbon and Quantum Dots Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ITMO University, Kronverksky pr., 49, St. Petersburg, Russia
School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Dublin Institute of Technology, Kevin Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
Funding
Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/nn506223h10.1021/nn506223h ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0006310.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00063 ↗
3. 10.1039/C5TA03280F10.1039/C5TA03280F ↗
4. 10.1039/C5EE03887A10.1039/C5EE03887A ↗
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.28010.1038/nphoton.2015.280 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.490093010.1063/1.4900930 ↗
7. 10.1038/nnano.2012.6010.1038/nnano.2012.60 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20140367310.1002/adfm.201403673 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.482411310.1063/1.4824113 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.290958910.1063/1.2909589 ↗
11. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.1110.1038/nphoton.2016.11 ↗
12. 10.1021/cm402143610.1021/cm4021436 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.491669710.1063/1.4916697 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/5/05540210.1088/0957-4484/18/5/055402 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.01710.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solener.2007.01.01510.1016/j.solener.2007.01.015 ↗
17. 10.1021/jp103617m10.1021/jp103617m ↗
18. 10.1063/1.494757010.1063/1.4947570 ↗
19. 10.1364/JOT.68.00088210.1364/JOT.68.000882 ↗
20. 10.1134/S106378341206002910.1134/S1063783412060029 ↗
21. 10.1088/0957-4484/24/33/33570110.1088/0957-4484/24/33/335701 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn302910610.1021/nn3029106 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp402287b10.1021/jp402287b ↗
24. 10.1021/jp501068a10.1021/jp501068a ↗
25. 10.1063/1.482971710.1063/1.4829717 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10812-011-9474-110.1007/s10812-011-9474-1 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.863310.1103/PhysRevB.54.8633 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6CP05786A10.1039/C6CP05786A ↗
29. 10.1021/jp071356110.1021/jp0713561 ↗
30. 10.1088/0957-4484/16/2/00110.1088/0957-4484/16/2/001 ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/4/02010.1088/0957-4484/17/4/020 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0214710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02147 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.05740410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.057404 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.12532010.1103/PhysRevB.82.125320 ↗
35. 10.1021/jp068307t10.1021/jp068307t ↗
36. 10.1021/jp902080p10.1021/jp902080p ↗
37. Madelung O. · 1
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.353910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3539 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ssc.2013.04.02210.1016/j.ssc.2013.04.022 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp503617h10.1021/jp503617h ↗
41. 10.1063/1.36390310.1063/1.363903 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.1061910.1103/PhysRevB.51.10619 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.36298110.1063/1.362981 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.16532010.1103/PhysRevB.78.165320 ↗
45. 10.1021/jz100756510.1021/jz1007565 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.271152910.1063/1.2711529 ↗
47. 10.1021/jp507181k10.1021/jp507181k ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.19531410.1103/PhysRevB.87.195314 ↗
49. 10.1117/12.200107310.1117/12.2001073 ↗
50. 10.1021/jz200197910.1021/jz2001979 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.321334910.1063/1.3213349 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.08532210.1103/PhysRevB.77.085322 ↗
53. Lakowicz J. R. · 2013