Deformation stabilization of lattice structures via foam addition
Source abstract
Abstract
Stochastic foams are soft but absorb energy efficiently under compressive loading; in contrast, periodic lattice structures are strong but generally exhibit poor energy-absorbing characteristics. Here we present and assess a hierarchical composite concept that aims to combine the desirable attributes of stochastic foams and lattice structures. The composite comprises a low-density polymer lattice structure with centimeter-scale voids and stochastic foam with pores in the sub-millimeter scale in the spaces between the lattice struts. The assessment is made on the basis of compressive response. We show that the post-yielding strength of the lattice can be doubled with the addition of even a weak (low-density) foam: the strength exceeds the combined contributions from the lattice structure and the foam alone. Addition of slightly denser foams can lead to an even larger strength increase. Using X-ray computed tomography, we show that the strength elevation is attributable to the stabilization of the strut members against buckling when surrounded by foam. Finite-element calculations of lattice structures alone and lattice/foam composites show similar characteristics. This composite concept may allow attainment of combinations of strength and energy absorption capacity that cannot be accessed by either foams or lattice structures alone.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular solids: structure and properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1997.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
2. Ashby · Phil Trans R Soc A: Math, Phys, Eng Sci · 2006 · 364 · 1510.1098/rsta.2005.1678 ↗
3. Fleck · Proc R Soc A · 2010 · 466 · 249510.1098/rspa.2010.0215 ↗
4. Zok · Int J Solids Struct · 2004 · 41 · 624910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.05.045 ↗
5. Chen · Thin-walled Struct · 2001 · 39 · 28710.1016/S0263-8231(01)00006-4 ↗
6. Kavi · Mater Des · 2006 · 27 · 26310.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.024 ↗
7. Evans · Prog Mater Sci · 2001 · 46 · 30910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00016-5 ↗
8. Harte · Eur J Mech A · 2000 · 19 · 3110.1016/S0997-7538(00)00158-3 ↗
9. Cartie · Compos Sci Technol · 2003 · 63 · 240110.1016/S0266-3538(03)00273-2 ↗
10. Otts · Polymer · 2005 · 46 · 816210.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.075 ↗
11. Yang · Polymer · 2009 · 50 · 171710.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.018 ↗
12. Jacobsen · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 672410.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.036 ↗
13. Jacobsen · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 120910.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.018 ↗
14. Jacobsen · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 254010.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.051 ↗
15. Jacobsen · Adv Mater · 2007 · 19 · 389210.1002/adma.200700797 ↗
16. Abaqus analysis users manual. Internet manual. Simulia. [Retrieved January 2012].
17. Triantafillou · Inter J Mech Sci · 1989 · 31 · 66510.1016/S0020-7403(89)80002-5 ↗
18. Combaz · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 516810.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.053 ↗
19. Rinaldi · J Mater Sci · 2012 · 48 · 662110.1007/s10853-012-6598-5 ↗