journal article·2012-03

Mechanism for serrated cathode dissolution in Cu/Sn/Cu interconnect under electron current stressing

J.H. Ke, H.Y. Chuang, W.L. Shih, C.R. Kao

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Dissolution of cathode metallization is one of the key degradation processes for solder interconnects under electron current stressing. Very recently, several studies have shown that this dissolution often results in a highly serrated interface, but little is known about how the serrated interface develops and what mechanism contributes to this intriguing microstructural feature. This paper presents detailed observations from a purposely designed experiment to uncover the responsible mechanism. These observations reveal that a pronounced and unstable grain boundary grooving between Cu 6 Sn 5 grains occurs before the serrated cathode starts to develop. This grooving process is driven by preferential dissolution at the grain boundaries, a process similar to the formation of scallop-type Cu 6 Sn 5 between molten solder and Cu. Furthermore, the diffusion and reaction are more significant at the valley of the grooves, which increases the local consumption rate of Cu. This non-uniform consumption of Cu eventually leads to a serrated cathode interface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Copper Interconnects and Reliability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Tu · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 545110.1063/1.1611263 ↗
2. Yeh · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 80 · 58010.1063/1.1432443 ↗
3. Lin · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 202910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.014 ↗
4. Hu · J Mater Res · 2003 · 18 · 254410.1557/JMR.2003.0355 ↗
5. Tsai · J Electron Mater · 2006 · 35 · 100510.1007/BF02692560 ↗
6. Huang · Phys Rev B · 1974 · 9 · 147910.1103/PhysRevB.9.1479 ↗
7. Dyson · J Appl Phys · 1966 · 37 · 237510.1063/1.1708821 ↗
8. Yeh · Phys Rev Lett · 1984 · 53 · 146910.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1469 ↗
9. Lu · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 21190910.1063/1.2936996 ↗
10. Ke · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 246210.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.048 ↗
11. Lin · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 107 · 07351610.1063/1.3371711 ↗
12. Deng WJ, Lin KL, Chiu YT, Lai YS. In: Electronic components and technology conference (ECTC); 2011.
13. Ma · J Mater Sci · 2011 · 46 · 489610.1007/s10853-011-5401-3 ↗
14. Wang · Intermetallics · 2011 · 19 · 7510.1016/j.intermet.2010.09.010 ↗
15. Huang · J Mater Res · 2008 · 23 · 25010.1557/JMR.2008.0024 ↗
16. Laurila T, Vuorinen V, Kivilahti JK. Mater Sci Eng R-Rep 2005; 49: 1.10.1016/j.mser.2005.03.001 ↗
17. Zeng · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 02450810.1063/1.1839637 ↗
18. Wang · Microelectron Reliab · 2009 · 49 · 24810.1016/j.microrel.2008.09.010 ↗
19. Wang · J Alloys Compd · 2009 · 478 · 12110.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.052 ↗
20. Yu · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 551410.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.022 ↗
21. Onishi M, Fujibuchi H. Trans Jpn Inst Metals 1975; 16: 539.10.2320/matertrans1960.16.539 ↗
22. Gan · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 06351410.1063/1.1861151 ↗
23. Hayashi · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 37 · 39310.1016/S1359-6462(97)00129-2 ↗
24. Suh · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 107510.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.009 ↗
25. Gagliano · J Electron Mater · 2003 · 32 · 144110.1007/s11664-003-0113-3 ↗
26. Liu · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 11211410.1063/1.2714100 ↗
27. Ma · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 91 · 331210.1063/1.1445283 ↗
28. Dybkov VI. Reaction diffusion and solid state chemical kinetics. Kyiv: IPMS Publications; 2002. p. 213.
29. Tu · 2007
30. Ho · Rep Prog Phys · 1989 · 52 · 30110.1088/0034-4885/52/3/002 ↗
31. Abdulhamid · J Electron Pack · 2009 · 131 · 01100210.1115/1.3068296 ↗
32. Tu · 2007
33. Chen · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 12210310.1063/1.2990047 ↗
34. Chen · J Mater Res · 2011 · 26 · 98310.1557/jmr.2011.25 ↗