Mechanical Properties and Failure Envelope of Kerogen Matrix by Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
Shale gas has become a major source of gas supply in the United States and is becoming increasingly important worldwide. The key technique for the development is hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells. Kerogen is the main component of organic matter in shale. It may be the spot of fracture initiation due to its weaker mechanical properties. The measurement of the mechanical properties and failure envelope of kerogen may be a challenge due to small-size kerogen aggregates immersed in shale rocks. In this work, we propose a practical scheme based on molecular dynamics simulations to estimate the elastic and relevant mechanical properties of kerogen for fracturing, including Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, compressive and tensile strengths, as well as the parameters of the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. This work sets the stage to obtain basic kerogen parameters for the simulation of fracturing in shale rocks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Petroleum Processing and Analysis · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Reservoir Engineering Research Institute, Palo Alto, California 94301, United States
Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, United States
Funding
Reservoir Engineering Research Institute
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. US Energy Information Administration. Annual Energy Outlook 2019: With Projections to 2050; (accessed January 2019).
2. US Energy Information Administration. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources; (accessed January 2019).
3. 10.2118/194198-PA10.2118/194198-PA ↗
4. 10.2118/181828-PA10.2118/181828-PA ↗
5. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.08410.1016/j.energy.2018.01.084 ↗
6. 10.1115/1.403201110.1115/1.4032011 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.06410.1016/j.energy.2017.05.064 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.06910.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.069 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.06310.1016/j.energy.2019.01.063 ↗
10. 10.3390/app908168610.3390/app9081686 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00603-017-1306-z10.1007/s00603-017-1306-z ↗
12. 10.1002/2016JB01355410.1002/2016JB013554 ↗
13. Bienniawski Z. T. · Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. · 1978 · 15 · 9910.1016/0148-9062(78)90003-7 ↗
14. Kovari K. · Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. · 1983 · 20 · 28510.1016/0148-9062(83)90598-3 ↗
15. ASTM · 2008
16. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength and Elastic Moduli of Intact Rock Core Specimens under Varying States of Stress and Temperatures. D7012-10 · 2010
17. 10.1144/1354-079302-55710.1144/1354-079302-557 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00603-013-0377-810.1007/s00603-013-0377-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.02310.1016/j.petrol.2012.01.023 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000128110.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001281 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10853-014-8682-510.1007/s10853-014-8682-5 ↗
22. 10.1111/1365-2478.1247510.1111/1365-2478.12475 ↗
23. 10.1080/00268976.2014.89739310.1080/00268976.2014.897393 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10704-015-0045-y10.1007/s10704-015-0045-y ↗
25. 10.1021/jp406329n10.1021/jp406329n ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0107110.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01071 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0274810.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02748 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b0512510.1021/acs.iecr.8b05125 ↗
29. 10.1002/2017WR02078010.1002/2017WR020780 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1232810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b12328 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat454110.1038/nmat4541 ↗
32. 10.1021/ef502154k10.1021/ef502154k ↗
33. 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.12.00110.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.12.001 ↗
34. 10.1190/1.144493410.1190/1.1444934 ↗
35. Ahrens T. J. · 1995 · 210.1029/RF002p0vii ↗
36. 10.1007/s00603-012-0281-710.1007/s00603-012-0281-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.05.00210.1016/j.jrmge.2015.05.002 ↗