Role of Oxygen Vacancy on the Hydrophobic Behavior of TiO2 Nanorods on Chemically Etched Si Pyramids
Source abstract
Abstract
Oxygen vacancy (OV) controlled hydrophobicity of self-assembled TiO 2 nanorods (NRs) on chemically etched Si pyramids is investigated by irradiating with 50 keV Ar + -ions at room temperature. Apparent contact angle (CA) is found to increase from 122° to 141° up to a fluence of 1 × 10 15 ions/cm 2, followed by a gradual reduction to 130° at 1 × 10 17 ions/cm 2 . However, the drop in apparent CA is found to be associated with the decrease in fractional surface area via transformation of NRs to an amorphous layer above 1 × 10 15 ions/cm 2, though it is still higher than that of as-grown one. Detailed X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electron paramagnetic resonance measurements suggest that the control of hydrophobic behavior is related to the suppression of surface free energy via migration of OVs into the voids in TiO x layers.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · ZnO doping and properties · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar University, NH-91, Tehsil Dadri, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 201 314, India
Surface Physics and Material Science Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics,1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700 064, India
Inter-University Accelerator Centre, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110 067, India
Dresden High Magnetic Field Laboratory (Hld), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (Hzdr), P.O. Box 51 01 19, 01314 Dresden, Germany
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00339-013-7819-810.1007/s00339-013-7819-8 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20029002010.1002/adma.200290020 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.114832610.1126/science.1148326 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.00910.1016/j.cis.2014.02.009 ↗
5. 10.1557/mrs2008.16110.1557/mrs2008.161 ↗
6. 10.1098/rsta.2010.020310.1098/rsta.2010.0203 ↗
7. 10.1209/epl/i2000-00418-810.1209/epl/i2000-00418-8 ↗
8. 10.1021/la703821h10.1021/la703821h ↗
9. Kung H. H. · 1989 · 45
10. 10.1063/1.489634010.1063/1.4896340 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep0710310.1038/srep07103 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.493966210.1063/1.4939662 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.494537910.1063/1.4945379 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp910492b10.1021/jp910492b ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.26610410.1103/PhysRevLett.87.266104 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.01310.1016/j.apsusc.2009.05.013 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat354510.1038/nmat3545 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp002525j10.1021/jp002525j ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.08.03910.1016/j.cplett.2005.08.039 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.06910.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.069 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.01310.1016/j.apsusc.2012.11.013 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0334610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03346 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.06210.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.02.062 ↗
24. Nastasi M. A. · 2006 · 8010.1007/978-3-540-45298-0 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.493696110.1063/1.4936961 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20110028710.1002/aenm.201100287 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.09210110.1103/PhysRevB.79.092101 ↗
28. 10.1021/am508544710.1021/am5085447 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.08521210.1103/PhysRevB.81.085212 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.015 ↗
31. 10.1002/chin.20101322210.1002/chin.201013222 ↗