Effect of Defects on the Behavior of ZnO Nanoparticle FETs
Source abstract
Abstract
The effects of ZnO crystal defects and the ubiquitous defect fluorescence on the electronic properties of nanocrystal thin-films were determined. Films were prepared from particles prepared in DMSO with controllable defect fluorescence. Particles were determined to range in size from 5 to 12 nm on average, with little bearing on the electronic properties. Thin-film electron mobilities were found to decrease from 0.04 cm 2 V −1 s −1 to 0.008 cm 2 V −1 s −1 with decreasing defect fluorescence, indicating crystal defects are pivotal to high-mobility ZnO nanoparticle films. The threshold voltage of ZnO nanoparticle FET devices was found to decrease from 120 to 40 V while the resistivity increased 100-fold with decreasing defect fluorescence. These results are found to be in excellent agreement with theory and greatly improve our understanding of ZnO nanoparticle conduction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Chemistry & Bio21 Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, Victoria, Australia
CSIRO Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Clayton, 3169, Victoria, Australia
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Sun B. · Nano Lett. · 2005 · 5 · 240810.1021/nl051586w ↗
2. Morfa A. J. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1981510.1021/jp107043z ↗
3. Ong B. S. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 275010.1021/ja068876e ↗
4. Mashford B. S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2010 · 20 · 16710.1039/B905256A ↗
5. Ohta H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 89 · 572010.1063/1.1367315 ↗
6. Beek W. J. E. · Adv. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 100910.1002/adma.200306659 ↗
7. Yoo J. B. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 68 · 469410.1063/1.346148 ↗
8. Olson D. C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 954410.1021/jp802626u ↗
9. Ozgur U. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 410.1063/1.1992666 ↗
10. Pearton S. J. · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2004 · 22 · 93210.1116/1.1714985 ↗
11. Mollwo E. · Z. Phys. · 1954 · 138 · 47810.1007/BF01340694 ↗
12. Kroger F. A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1954 · 22 · 25010.1063/1.1740044 ↗
13. Leiter F. H. · Phys. Status Solidi B-Basic Res. · 2001 · 226 · R410.1002/1521-3951(200107)226:1<R4::AID-PSSB99994>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
14. Norberg N. S. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 2081010.1021/jp0535285 ↗
15. Vanheusden K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 79 · 798310.1063/1.362349 ↗
16. Ellmer K. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 34 · 309710.1088/0022-3727/34/21/301 ↗
17. Minami T. · J. Cryst. Growth · 1992 · 117 · 37010.1016/0022-0248(92)90778-H ↗
18. Ziegler E. · Phys. Status Solidi A-Appl. Res. · 1981 · 66 · 63510.1002/pssa.2210660228 ↗
19. Wood A. · Aust. J. Chem. · 2003 · 56 · 105110.1071/CH03120 ↗
20. Seto J. Y. W. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1975 · 46 · 524710.1063/1.321593 ↗
21. Eda K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1978 · 49 · 296410.1063/1.325139 ↗
22. Sze, S.; Ng, K.,Physics of Semiconductor Devices,3rd ed.Wiley-Interscience:Hoboken, NJ, 2007; p305.10.1002/0470068329 ↗