Energetics of CdSe Quantum Dots Adsorbed on TiO2
Source abstract
Abstract
Understanding how quantum dot (QD)-sensitized solar cells operate requires accurate determination of the offset between the lowest-unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the sensitizer quantum dot and the conduction band of the metal oxide electrode. We present detailed optical spectroscopy, low-energy photoelectron spectroscopy, and two-photon photoemission studies of the energetics of size-selected CdSe colloidal QDs deposited on TiO 2 electrodes. Our experimental findings show that in contrast to the prediction of simplified models based on bulk band offsets and effective mass considerations, band alignment in this system is strongly modified by the interaction between the QDs and the electrode. In particular, we find relatively small conduction band-LUMO offsets, and near “pinning” of the QD LUMO relative to the conduction band of the TiO 2 electrode, which is explained by the strong QD-electrode interaction. That interaction is the origin for the highly efficient QD to electrode charge transfer, and it also bears on the possibility of hot carrier injection in these types of cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Physics, ‡Department of Physics of Complex Systems, and §Department of Materials and Interfaces, Weizmann Institute, Rehovot 76100, Israel
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Wei S. H. · App. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 201110.1063/1.121249 ↗
2. Haus J. W. · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 135910.1103/PhysRevB.47.1359 ↗
3. Schooss D. · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1707210.1103/PhysRevB.49.17072 ↗
4. Smith A. M. · Nat. Nano · 2009 · 4 · 5610.1038/nnano.2008.360 ↗
5. Markus T. Z. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1420010.1021/jp9041167 ↗
6. Xie Z. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 86310.1021/nn102002x ↗
7. O’Regan B. · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
8. Kamat P. V. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1873710.1021/jp806791s ↗
9. Hodes G. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1777810.1021/jp803310s ↗
10. Tvrdy K. · Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences · 2011 · 108 · 2910.1073/pnas.1011972107 ↗
11. Robel I. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2006 · 128 · 238510.1021/ja056494n ↗
12. Kongkanand A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 400710.1021/ja0782706 ↗
13. Pijpers J. J. H. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1886610.1021/jp108165g ↗
14. Tisdale W. A. · Proc. Nat. Acad. Sciences · 2011 · 108 · 96510.1073/pnas.1006665107 ↗
15. Hyun B. R. · ACS Nano · 2008 · 2 · 220610.1021/nn800336b ↗
16. Jiang X. · J. Mat. Res. · 2007 · 22 · 220410.1557/jmr.2007.0289 ↗
17. Jin S. · Nano Lett. · 2009 · 9 · 244810.1021/nl9011744 ↗
18. Wang C. · Science · 2001 · 291 · 239010.1126/science.291.5512.2390 ↗
19. Chi C. F. · App. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 01210110.1063/1.3533642 ↗
20. Orendorz A. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 252 · 8510.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.002 ↗
21. Liu G. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2002 · 106 · 581410.1021/jp014192b ↗
22. Carlson B. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 841910.1021/jp7113434 ↗
23. Brus L. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1986 · 90 · 255510.1021/j100403a003 ↗
24. Adachi S. · 200510.1002/0470090340 ↗
25. Tang H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 75 · 204210.1063/1.356306 ↗
26. Pascual J. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1977 · 39 · 149010.1103/PhysRevLett.39.1490 ↗
27. Enright B. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1996 · 100 · 102710.1021/jp951142w ↗
28. Jayaweera P. V. V. · Inorg. Chim. Acta · 2008 · 361 · 70710.1016/j.ica.2007.05.030 ↗
29. Page M. · Energy and Environmental Science · 2009 · 2 · 22010.1039/B813740D ↗
30. Ohya Y. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1996 · 79 · 82510.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08512.x ↗
31. Markus T. Z. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 1389710.1021/jp1064038 ↗