Interfacial reaction between Sn–Ag–Cu solder and Co–P films with various microstructures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We electroplated Co–P films with nanocrystalline, amorphous and nanocrystalline/amorphous mixed structures and used them as under-bump metallization (UBM) joined with Sn–Ag–Cu lead-free solder. We systematically investigated the interfacial reaction between the Sn–Ag–Cu solder and the Co–P UBM and analyzed the growth mechanisms of the intermetallic compounds formed at the interfaces of the Sn–Ag–Cu/Co–P joints through multiple reflows. Among the three kinds of Co–P films, the film with a mixed structure shows the best diffusion-barrier properties and is a good candidate for the UBM joined with the Sn–Ag–Cu solder. For the nanocrystalline Co–P UBM, Co diffuses quickly toward the solder and Sn does not diffuse into the UBM, whereas for the amorphous Co–P film not only does Co diffuse into the solder, but also Sn diffuses into the Co–P film with a large diffusion rate. In addition, the first-principles calculation shows that the exchange coupling between Co(3 d 7 4 s 2 ) and Sn(5 s 2 5 p 2 ) electrons and between Sn(5 s 2 5 p 2 ) and P(3 s 2 3 p 3 ) electrons results in the formation of CoSn and SnP 3 , which originate from the diffusion and reaction of Co and Sn atoms, respectively; this is consistent with the experimental data of transmission electron microscopy characterization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Li · Science · 2005 · 308 · 141910.1126/science.1110168 ↗
2. Zeng · Mater Sci Eng R · 2002 · 38 · 5510.1016/S0927-796X(02)00007-4 ↗
3. Abtew · Mater Sci Eng R · 2000 · 27 · 9510.1016/S0927-796X(00)00010-3 ↗
4. Han · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 10210.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.023 ↗
5. Vandevelde · Microelectron Reliab · 2007 · 47 · 25910.1016/j.microrel.2006.09.034 ↗
6. Kang · J Electron Mater · 2006 · 35 · 47910.1007/BF02690535 ↗
7. Xu · J Electron Mater · 2008 · 37 · 12510.1007/s11664-007-0304-4 ↗
8. Yoon · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 452–453 · 4610.1016/j.msea.2006.10.163 ↗
9. Ma · J Mater Sci · 2009 · 44 · 114110.1007/s10853-008-3125-9 ↗
10. Lee NC. In: Lu D, Wong CP, editors. Materials for advanced packaging. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 181–218.10.1007/978-0-387-78219-5_5 ↗
11. Park · J Electron Mater · 2002 · 11 · 117510.1007/s11664-002-0007-9 ↗
12. Laurila · Mater Sci Eng R · 2005 · 49 · 110.1016/j.mser.2005.03.001 ↗
13. Kang · Scr Mater · 2009 · 60 · 25710.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.10.017 ↗
14. Chen · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 246110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00076-9 ↗
15. Choi · J Appl Phys · 2003 · 94 · 566510.1063/1.1616993 ↗
16. Kim · J Electron Mater · 2006 · 35 · 27310.1007/BF02692446 ↗
17. Yu · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 03410510.1063/1.3074367 ↗
18. Choi · J Electron Mater · 1999 · 28 · 125110.1007/s11664-999-0164-1 ↗
19. Tai · Scr Mater · 2009 · 61 · 74810.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.024 ↗
20. Magagnin · Electrochim Acta · 2005 · 50 · 462110.1016/j.electacta.2004.10.098 ↗
21. Strandjord · Microelectron Reliab · 2002 · 42 · 26510.1016/S0026-2714(01)00236-0 ↗
22. Guo · J Electron Mater · 2009 · 38 · 264710.1007/s11664-009-0910-4 ↗
23. Humpston · J Mater Sci: Mater Electron · 2010 · 21 · 58410.1007/s10854-009-9961-9 ↗
24. Alam · Microelectron Reliab · 2002 · 42 · 106510.1016/S0026-2714(02)00068-9 ↗
25. He · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 204710.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.042 ↗
26. Chen · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 566810.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.035 ↗
27. Lin · J Electron Mater · 2006 · 35 · 710.1007/s11664-006-0177-y ↗
28. Lin · J Alloy Comp · 2007 · 439 · 7410.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.067 ↗
29. Islam · Microelectron Reliab · 2003 · 43 · 203110.1016/S0026-2714(03)00190-2 ↗
30. Islam · Mater Sci Eng B · 2005 · 117 · 24610.1016/j.mseb.2004.11.027 ↗
31. Zhu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 456 · 10910.1016/j.msea.2006.11.117 ↗
32. Limaye · IEEE Trans Adv Packag · 2008 · 31 · 5110.1109/TADVP.2007.909459 ↗
33. Labie R, Ratchev P, Beyne E. 2005 Proceedings – 55th electronic components and technology conference, ECTC; 2005. p. 449–51.
34. Wu · J Electrochem Soc · 2008 · 155 · D36910.1149/1.2885083 ↗
35. Pan · J Electron Mater · 2011 · 40 · 33010.1007/s11664-010-1488-6 ↗
36. Pan · J Electrochem Soc · 2011 · 158 · P12310.1149/2.004111jes ↗
37. O’Sullivan · IBM J Res Dev · 1998 · 42 · 60710.1147/rd.425.0607 ↗
38. Aal · Surf Coat Technol · 2008 · 202 · 459110.1016/j.surfcoat.2008.03.023 ↗
39. Lu · IEEE Trans Magn · 2011 · 47 · 379910.1109/TMAG.2011.2158074 ↗
40. Lu · Surf Coat Technol · 2012 · 206 · 482210.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.017 ↗
41. Li · J Mater Res · 2005 · 20 · 262210.1557/JMR.2005.0346 ↗
42. Jiang · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 16541010.1103/PhysRevB.72.165410 ↗
43. Jiang · J Chem Phys · 2009 · 130 · 07470510.1063/1.3077295 ↗
44. Segall · J Phys Condens Matter · 2002 · 14 · 271710.1088/0953-8984/14/11/301 ↗
45. Clark · Zeitschrift für Kristallographie Cryst Mater · 2005 · 220 · 56710.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
46. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
47. Lu · Intermetallics · 2010 · 18 · 118010.1016/j.intermet.2010.02.034 ↗