journal article·2016-05-05

Conductive Network and β Polymorph Content Evolution Caused by Thermal Treatment in Carbon Nanotubes-BaTiO3 Hybrids Reinforced Polyvinylidene Fluoride Composites

Benhui Fan, Fahmi Bedoui, Steven Weigand, Jinbo Bai

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 120· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

A good dispersion of carbon nanotube (CNT) in polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) is realized by using CNT and BaTiO 3 (BT) hybrids (H-CNT-BT) with a special core–shell structure. Thus, a high dielectric performance is achieved for the composite (H-CNT-BT/PVDF). Carried by BT, CNT is easy to connect with each other and thus more interface area may be created which helps to achieve an extremely low percolation threshold ( f c ). Moreover, the dielectric permittivity of the composite near f c is increased more than three times after thermal treatment while dielectric loss remains at a low level. In order to study more comprehensively about the influence of thermal treatment, in situ synchrotron X-ray is used to detect recrystalline behavior of PVDF. Results of wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD) and small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) show that after thermal treatment, the content of β polymorph has increased nearly double times at the interface of CNT-PVDF, and the thickness of amorphous layers ( L a ) in PVDF’s long periods ( L p ) has shrunk around 10 Å. Increased β polymorph at the interface of CNT-PVDF may form an ideal structure with the grading dielectric permittivities from the center to the border which decreases the contrast between CNT and PVDF. Meanwhile, the evolution of CNT’s network possibly occurs in the procedure of L a shrinkage, where the strong interfacial polarization may be aroused. Besides, an increase in the thickness of crystalline lamella may also arouse more orientational polarization and improve dielectric properties at high frequency. Combining with BT’s buffer role for blocking possible leakage current during the percolative behavior, the dielectric loss of composite can remain at a very low level even after thermal treatment. In addition, experimental results show that prolonging annealing duration or increasing annealing cycles favors stabilization of CNT’s dynamic percolation, which reduces the sensitivity of CNT’s network in the composite and further improves dielectric properties. After thermal treatment, the dielectric permittivity reachs 1172, but dielectric loss remains at 0.55 at 100 Hz. To our best knowledge, this high dielectric performance is really rare, only found in recent reports.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dielectric materials and actuators · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lab. MSSMAT, UMR CNRS 8579, Ecole Centrale Paris, 92290 Châtenay-Malabry, France

Sorbonne Universités, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, Roberval UMR-CNRS 7337, 60203 Compiègne, France

Northwestern University, member of the “DND-CAT Synchrotron Research Center”, Argonne, Illinois, 60439-4857 United States

Funding

China Scholarship Council

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Bohlen M. · Annu. Rev. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 1 · 150110
2. 10.1002/app.2313710.1002/app.23137 ↗
3. 10.1021/ma901765j10.1021/ma901765j ↗
4. 10.1021/nl049420310.1021/nl0494203 ↗
5. 10.1021/jp073102l10.1021/jp073102l ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.01110.1016/j.carbon.2009.05.011 ↗
7. 10.1002/pen.2323610.1002/pen.23236 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma400035j10.1021/ma400035j ↗
9. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.12.005 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10452910.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104529 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.367355510.1063/1.3673555 ↗
12. 10.1021/nn900641210.1021/nn9006412 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.369119810.1063/1.3691198 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20130175210.1002/adma.201301752 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20090154510.1002/adma.200901545 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.05310.1016/j.polymer.2005.11.053 ↗
17. 10.1002/pssb.20087962210.1002/pssb.200879622 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.10.06310.1016/j.polymer.2011.10.063 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20090220710.1002/adfm.200902207 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.06410.1016/j.carbon.2012.08.064 ↗
21. 10.1166/sam.2014.172610.1166/sam.2014.1726 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp111716310.1021/jp1117163 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.05110.1016/j.polymer.2006.04.051 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.02410.1016/j.polymer.2007.12.024 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.492815010.1063/1.4928150 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma402371810.1021/ma4023718 ↗
27. 10.1016/0032-3861(90)90243-R10.1016/0032-3861(90)90243-R ↗
28. 10.1109/TDEI.2005.151109210.1109/TDEI.2005.1511092 ↗
29. Rabiej S. · Polimery · 2011 · 56 · 66210.14314/polimery.2011.662 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.06910.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.069 ↗
31. 10.1021/cr990037610.1021/cr9900376 ↗