Formic Acid Dehydration Rates and Elementary Steps on Lewis Acid–Base Site Pairs at Anatase and Rutile TiO2 Surfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Formic acid (HCOOH) decomposition is often used to assess the acid–base properties of oxide surfaces. Its reverse reaction forms HCOOH and formate species that can act as intermediates in CO 2 /CO/H 2 /H 2 O reactions that are important in C 1 conversions. This study describes the mechanism of HCOOH dehydration on acid–base pairs at anatase and rutile TiO 2 surfaces through spectroscopic, desorption-reaction, kinetic, isotopic, and theoretical methods. HCOOH dehydration turnover rates are measured at coverages that allow bound intermediates to interact directly with Ti 5c –O 2c pairs. Such rates then reflect their acid–base properties without interference from a refractory bidentate formate adlayer that acts as the catalytic surface at lower temperatures, as evident from infrared and desorption reaction data. HCOOH dehydration elementary steps involve the concurrent activation of C–O and C–H bonds in a molecularly bound HCOOH (HCOOH*) by a Ti 5c –O 2c pair at the kinetically relevant step. The transition state mediating this step involves the OH group and the H-atom of the C–H group in HCOOH* that are almost fully transferred to the Ti 5c and the vicinal O 2c center, respectively. Such concerted interactions with the acid and base centers and the late character of the transition state render the H 2 O dissociation energy at Ti 5c –O 2c pairs a more suitable descriptor of HCOOH reactivity than the respective strengths of each Lewis center. These mechanistic conclusions allow quantitative inferences of the rate and kinetic parameters for HCOOH synthesis from CO–H 2 O reactants on TiO 2 surfaces through the tenets of microscopic reversibility extended to the sequence of elementary steps. The results also illustrate how acid–base pairs act in concert to stabilize the relevant transition states, thus making the balance between acid and base strengths, instead of their independent properties, the rigorous arbiters of reactivity, as shown by the similar reactivities and H 2 O dissociation energies on Ti 5c –O 2c pairs at anatase and rutile surfaces in spite of their very different acid and base strengths.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States
Funding
Basic Energy Sciences
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c3cs60323g10.1039/c3cs60323g ↗
2. 10.1039/tf970660075610.1039/tf9706600756 ↗
3. 10.1007/bf0076473010.1007/bf00764730 ↗
4. 10.1021/acscatal.5b0206010.1021/acscatal.5b02060 ↗
5. 10.1021/j100412a07410.1021/j100412a074 ↗
6. 10.1016/0021-9517(83)90158-610.1016/0021-9517(83)90158-6 ↗
7. 10.1002/ange.20080572310.1002/ange.200805723 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.susc.2015.11.02010.1016/j.susc.2015.11.020 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.susc.2015.09.02310.1016/j.susc.2015.09.023 ↗
10. 10.1039/tf967630308110.1039/tf9676303081 ↗
11. 10.1039/tf967630307210.1039/tf9676303072 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp961494i10.1021/jp961494i ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.04310.1016/j.jcat.2019.12.043 ↗
14. 10.1016/s0360-0564(08)60338-710.1016/s0360-0564(08)60338-7 ↗
15. 10.1021/jp801642510.1021/jp8016425 ↗
16. 10.1016/0021-9517(70)90306-410.1016/0021-9517(70)90306-4 ↗
17. 10.1021/ja210083d10.1021/ja210083d ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.02610.1016/j.cattod.2005.11.026 ↗
19. 10.1021/ja208760j10.1021/ja208760j ↗
20. 10.1021/cs501656x10.1021/cs501656x ↗
21. 10.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-010.1016/s0167-5729(02)00100-0 ↗
22. 10.1103/physrevb.63.15540910.1103/physrevb.63.155409 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.11.00610.1016/j.jcat.2016.11.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.10.01310.1016/j.jcat.2010.10.013 ↗
25. 10.1002/cctc.20110005110.1002/cctc.201100051 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
27. 10.1021/ie50448a02210.1021/ie50448a022 ↗
28. 10.1115/1.368712110.1115/1.3687121 ↗
29. Mirabella F. M. · 1998
30. 10.1103/physrevlett.77.386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
31. 10.1103/physrevb.49.1425110.1103/physrevb.49.14251 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
33. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
34. 10.1103/physrevb.50.1795310.1103/physrevb.50.17953 ↗
35. 10.1002/jcc.2049510.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
36. 10.1016/0039-6028(94)00731-410.1016/0039-6028(94)00731-4 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.48009710.1063/1.480097 ↗
38. Donald A. · 2000
39. 10.1021/cr300329s10.1021/cr300329s ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.08.01110.1016/j.jcat.2010.08.011 ↗
41. 10.1021/jp993583b10.1021/jp993583b ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.12.01910.1016/j.jcat.2010.12.019 ↗
43. 10.1002/anie.20190670910.1002/anie.201906709 ↗
44. 10.1021/jp807874810.1021/jp8078748 ↗
45. 10.1021/jp049746010.1021/jp0497460 ↗
46. 10.1021/jp052377310.1021/jp0523773 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.319430110.1063/1.3194301 ↗
48. 10.1103/physrevb.79.09210110.1103/physrevb.79.092101 ↗
49. De Donder T. · 1937
50. 10.1021/i100021a01010.1021/i100021a010 ↗
51. The NIST Standard Reference Database.