Influence of Anodization-Electrolyte Aging on the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Nanotube Arrays
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide TiO 2 nanotubular films prepared using the anodic oxidation process applied to various forms of metal titanium are promising materials for photocatalytic applications. However, during successive anodizations in batch-anodization cells, the chemical composition of the NH 4 F- and water-based ethylene glycol electrolyte changes with each subsequent anodization, which greatly affects the final photocatalytic properties of the annealed TiO 2 nanotubular films. In the present study, 20 titanium discs (Φ 90 mm) were sequentially anodized in the same anodization electrolyte. The chemical composition of the electrolyte was measured after each anodization and correlated with the anodization current density, temperature, electrical conductivity, and pH of the electrolyte and with the morphology, structure, composition, and photocatalytic activity of the resulting TiO 2 nanotube films. It was found that the length of the TiO 2 nanotubes decreased with the age of the electrolyte due to its lower conductivity. The subsurface chemical composition was evaluated by time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF SIMS) analyses, and the integrated ToF SIMS signals over a depth of 250 nm for the TiO 2 nanotube films showed that the concentration of F – in the annealed TiO 2 film increased with each subsequent anodization due to the increased pH value of the electrolyte. As a consequence, the concentration of the OH – and O 2 – species decreased, which is a major reason for the reduced photocatalytic activity of the TiO 2 films. It is proposed that the length of the TiO 2 nanotubes does not play a decisive role in determining the photocatalytic activity of the TiO 2 nanotube films. Finally, the best measured degradation results of 60% for caffeine were thus achieved for the first anodized titanium discs. After that the efficiency gradually decreased for each subsequent anodized disc.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department for Nanostructured Materials, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Jožef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of Inorganic Chemistry and Technology, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Department of Surface Engineering and Optoelectronics, Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Funding
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS · H2020 Research Infrastructures
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1017/S036839310010284610.1017/S0368393100102846 ↗
2. 10.1021/ed300559810.1021/ed3005598 ↗
3. 10.1098/rspa.1970.012910.1098/rspa.1970.0129 ↗
4. 10.1038/337147a010.1038/337147a0 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20046245910.1002/anie.200462459 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.elecom.2007.11.01410.1016/j.elecom.2007.11.014 ↗
7. 10.1021/ic801888710.1021/ic8018887 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20100137410.1002/anie.201001374 ↗
9. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0370910.1021/acscatal.6b03709 ↗
10. 10.1021/am402389t10.1021/am402389t ↗
11. 10.3390/ma510189010.3390/ma5101890 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.04110.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.041 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmst.2015.07.01210.1016/j.jmst.2015.07.012 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cossms.2007.08.00410.1016/j.cossms.2007.08.004 ↗
15. 10.1088/1757-899X/21/1/01200210.1088/1757-899X/21/1/012002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.03710.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.037 ↗
17. 10.3938/jkps.54.102710.3938/jkps.54.1027 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.11.00210.1016/j.jelechem.2015.11.002 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0338310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03383 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.03210.1016/j.foodchem.2006.07.032 ↗
21. Vogel A. I. · 1978
22. 10.1007/s40735-015-0024-x10.1007/s40735-015-0024-x ↗
23. 10.1098/rsos.18194810.1098/rsos.181948 ↗
24. 10.3938/jkps.66.113510.3938/jkps.66.1135 ↗
25. 10.1021/jp066352v10.1021/jp066352v ↗
26. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.12.02410.1016/j.elecom.2006.12.024 ↗
27. 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20160505.1510.11648/j.ijmsa.20160505.15 ↗
28. Joseph S. · Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. · 2014 · 5 · 85
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.15210.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.152 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.07710.1016/j.electacta.2014.05.077 ↗
31. 10.1002/celc.20170123110.1002/celc.201701231 ↗
32. Ying Chin L. · 2016 · 20
33. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.08810.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.088 ↗
34. 10.1155/2013/34817110.1155/2013/348171 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.04010.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.040 ↗
36. 10.1021/es047985v10.1021/es047985v ↗
37. 10.1126/science.123987910.1126/science.1239879 ↗