journal article·2013-06-13

Thermal Evolution of Cation Distribution/Crystallite Size and Their Correlation with the Magnetic State of Yb-Substituted Zinc Ferrite Nanoparticles

M. Vucinic-Vasic, E. S. Bozin, L. Bessais, G. Stojanovic, U. Kozmidis-Luburic, M. Abeykoon, B. Jancar, A. Meden, A. Kremenovic, B. Antic

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 117· Issue 23
Publisher page

Abstract

Evolution of the structural and magnetic properties of ZnFe 1.95 Yb 0.05 O 4 nanoparticles, prepared via a high-energy ball milling route and exposed to further thermal annealing/heating, was assessed in detail and correlation of these properties explored. While as-prepared spinel nanoparticles possess a high degree of inversion, heating of the sample to ∼500 °C is found to rapidly alter the cation distribution from mixed to normal, in agreement with the known cation preferences. Under the same conditions the crystallite size only slowly grows. By further thermal treatment at higher temperatures, the crystallite size is changed more appreciably. An interrelationship among the lattice parameter, octahedral site occupancy, and crystallite size has been established. The observations are (a) both the site occupancy of Fe 3+ at octahedral 16d spinel sites ( N 16d (Fe 3+ )) and the cubic lattice parameter rapidly increase with an initial increase of the crystallite size, (b) the lattice parameter increases with increasing occupancy, N 16d (Fe 3+ ), and (c) there appears to be a critical nanoparticle diameter (approximately 15 nm) above which both the site occupancy and lattice parameter values are saturated. The magnetic behavior of the annealed samples appears to be correlated to the evolution of both the cation distribution and crystallite size, as follows. As-prepared samples and those annealed at lower temperatures show superparamagnetic behavior at room temperature, presumably as a consequence of the Fe 3+ distribution and strong Fe 3+ (8a)–O–Fe 3+ (16d) superexchange interactions. Samples with a nanoparticle diameter greater than 12 nm and with almost normal distributions exhibit the paramagnetic state. The coercive field is found to decrease with an increase of the crystallite size. Partial Yb 3+ /Fe 3+ substitution is found to increase the inversion parameter and saturation magnetization. Detailed knowledge of the thermal evolution of structural/microstructural parameters allows control over the cation distribution and crystallite size and hence the magnetic properties of nanoferrites.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Multiferroics and related materials · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg D. Obradovica 6, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia

Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States

ICPME, UMR 7075 CNRS and Université Pierre and Marie Curie, 94230 Thiais, France

Jožef Štefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Institute of Nuclear Sciences “Vinča”, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia

Faculty of Mining and Geology, Laboratory for Crystallography, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 162, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Cvejic Z. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 472 · 57110.1016/j.jallcom.2008.05.026 ↗
2. Antic B. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2004 · 108 · 1264610.1021/jp036214v ↗
3. Hammersley A. P. · High Pressure Res. · 1996 · 14 · 23510.1080/08957959608201408 ↗
4. Egami T. · 2004
5. Qiu X. · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2004 · 37 · 67810.1107/S0021889804011744 ↗
6. Rodriguez-Carvajal, J.FullProf computer program, 2009.http://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/(accessed January 2010).
7. Newkirk A. E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1955 · 77 · 452110.1021/ja01622a023 ↗
8. Hofmann M. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2004 · 39 · 505710.1023/B:JMSC.0000039185.80910.59 ↗
9. Philip J. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102 · 05430510.1063/1.2777168 ↗
10. Ammar S. · J. Non-Cryst. Solids · 2004 · 345 · 65810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.08.162 ↗
11. Nakashima S. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 17444310.1103/PhysRevB.75.174443 ↗
12. Antic B. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. · 2013 · 25 · 086001
13. Shanon R. D. · Acta Crystallogr., A · 1976 · 32 · 75110.1107/S0567739476001551 ↗
14. Gleiter H. · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00285-2 ↗
15. Šepelák V. · Mater. Sci. Eng., A · 2004 · 375 · 86110.1016/j.msea.2003.10.178 ↗
16. Ottonello G. · Phys. Chem. Mineral. · 1986 · 13 · 7910.1007/BF00311897 ↗
17. Honkimäki, V.; Surotti, P.InDefect and Microstructure Analysis by Diffraction;Snyder, R. L.; Fiala, J.; Bunge, H. J., Eds.Oxford University Press:New York, 1999; pp41–58.
18. Lemine O. M. · Physica B · 2001 · 406 · 198910.1016/j.physb.2011.02.072 ↗
19. Chinnasamy C. N. · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 18410810.1103/PhysRevB.63.184108 ↗
20. Yao C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1227410.1021/jp0732763 ↗
21. Malik R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 104 · 06431710.1063/1.2982278 ↗
22. Sepelak V. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 502610.1021/jp067620s ↗