The competition between metastable and equilibrium S (Al 2 CuMg) phase during the decomposition of Al Cu Mg alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The decomposition sequence of the supersaturated solid solution leading to the formation of the equilibrium S (Al2CuMg) phase in Al Cu Mg alloys has long been the subject of ambiguity and debate. Recent high-resolution synchrotron powder diffraction experiments have shown that the decomposition sequence does involve a metastable variant of the S phase (denoted S1), which has lattice parameters that are distinctly different to those of the equilibrium S phase (denoted S2). In this paper, the difference between these two phases is resolved using high-resolution synchrotron and neutron powder diffraction and atom probe tomography, and the transformation from S1 to S2 is characterised in detail by in situ synchrotron powder diffraction. The results of these experiments confirm that there are no significant differences between the crystal structures of S1 and S2, however, the powder diffraction and atom probe measurements both indicate that the S1 phase forms with a slight deficiency in Cu. The in situ isothermal aging experiments show that S1 forms rapidly, reaching its maximum concentration in only a few minutes at high temperatures, while complete conversion to the S2 phase can take thousands of hours at low temperature. The kinetics of S phase precipitation have been quantitatively analysed for the first time and it is shown that S1 phase forms with an average activation energy of 75 kJ/mol, which is much lower than the activation energy for Cu and Mg diffusion in an Al matrix (136 kJ/mol and 131 kJ/mol, respectively). The mechanism of the replacement of S1 with the equilibrium S2 phase is discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. The crystal structure of Al2CuMg
2. Structure and morphology of S-phase precipitates in aluminum10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00259-1 ↗
3. The Crystallography and Morphology of the S’-Phase Precipitate in an Al(CuMg) Alloy
4. Investigation of the crystallography and morphology of the S′ precipitate in an Al(CuMg) alloy by HREM10.1080/09500838908206354 ↗
5. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy and tomographic atom probe studies of the hardening precipitation in an Al–Cu–Mg alloy10.1080/14786430412331283983 ↗
6. Orientation relationships and lattice matching for the S phase in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.011 ↗
7. Two types of S phase precipitates in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.015 ↗
8. The coexistence of two S (Al2CuMg) phases in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.044 ↗
9. Bagaryatsky · Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR. · 1952 · 87 · 397
10. Bagaryatsky · Dokl. Akad. SSSR · 1952 · 87 · 559
11. The structural ageing characteristics of Al–Cu–Mg alloys with copper: magnesium weight ratios of 7: 1 and 2.2: 1
12. GPB zones and composite GPB/GPBII zones in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.042 ↗
13. Etude des premiers stades de decomposition d’un alliage Al–Cu–Mg10.1016/0036-9748(84)90177-7 ↗
14. Precipitation hardening of an Al–4.2wt% Mg–0.6wt% Cu alloy10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00033-0 ↗
15. Comments on “cluster hardening in an aged Al-Cu-Mg alloy”10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00365-0 ↗
16. Coexistence of clusters, GPB zones, S″-, S′- and S-phases in an Al–0.9% Cu–1.4% Mg alloy10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00422-X ↗
17. The assessment of GPB2/S′′ structures in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1016/S0921-5093(04)00913-X ↗
18. The nucleation and growth of S’ precipitates in an aluminium-2.5% copper-1.2% magnesium alloy10.1016/0001-6160(65)90043-X ↗
19. An electron microscope investigation of the interfacial structure of semi-coherent precipitates10.1080/14786436808223031 ↗
20. Origins of hardening in aged Al–Cu–Mg–(Ag) alloys10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00039-6 ↗
21. Response to comments on cluster hardening in an aged Al–Cu–Mg alloy10.1016/S1359-6462(98)00364-9 ↗
22. Precipitates and intermetallic phases in precipitation hardening Al–Cu–Mg–(Li) based alloys10.1179/174328005X14357 ↗
23. Origin of the modified orientation relationship for S(S″)-phase in Al–Mg–Cu alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.045 ↗
24. Structure refinement of the S-phase precipitate MgCuAl210.1515/znb-2005-0502 ↗
25. In situ evaluation of the microstructure evolution during rapid hardening of an Al–2.5Cu–1.5Mg (wt.%) alloy10.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.027 ↗
26. The effect of precipitate size on the yield strength-pitting corrosion correlation in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.010 ↗
27. ThermoCalc, n.d.
28. Gault · 2012
29. Advances in the calibration of atom probe tomographic reconstruction10.1063/1.3068197 ↗
30. Qualification of the tomographic reconstruction in atom probe by advanced spatial distribution map techniques10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.03.016 ↗
31. M.W. Johnson, W.I.F. David, HRPD: The High Resolution Powder Diffractometer at the SNS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, 1985.
32. Design and performance of the new supermirror guide on HRPD at ISIS10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.066 ↗
33. The high resolution powder diffraction beamline for the Australian synchrotron
34. Klug · 1974
35. CONVAS2: a program for the merging of diffraction data10.1154/1.3479121 ↗
36. A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures10.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
37. Young · 1993
38. The effect of profile-step counting time on the determination of crystal structure parameters by X-ray Rietveld analysis10.1107/S0021889884011547 ↗
39. Correction of intensities for preferred orientation in powder diffractometry: application of the March model10.1107/S0021889886089458 ↗
40. Size-broadening anisotropy in whole powder pattern fitting. Application to zinc oxide and interpretation of the apparent crystallites in terms of physical models10.1107/S0021889808012223 ↗
41. Evolution of solute clustering in Al–Cu–Mg alloys during secondary ageing10.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.021 ↗
42. Nanostructure of aluminium alloy 2024: segregation, clustering and precipitation processes10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.033 ↗
43. Quantitative phase analysis from neutron powder diffraction data using the Rietveld method10.1107/S0021889887086199 ↗
44. On the strengthening response of aluminum alloys containing shear-resistant plate-shaped precipitates10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.023 ↗
45. The effect of shear-resistant, plate-shaped precipitates on the work hardening of Al alloys: towards a prediction of the strength–elongation correlation10.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.034 ↗
46. Modeling the kinetics of precipitation in aluminium alloys
47. On the reversibility of dislocation slip during cyclic deformation of Al alloys containing shear-resistant particles10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.007 ↗
48. The effect of interrupted aging on the yield strength and uniform elongation of precipitation-hardened Al alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2013.06.036 ↗
49. Reaction kinetics in processes of nucleation and growth
50. Kinetics of Phase Change. I General Theory10.1063/1.1750380 ↗
51. Kinetics of phase change. II transformation-time relations for random distribution of nuclei10.1063/1.1750631 ↗
52. Granulation, phase change, and microstructure kinetics of phase change. III10.1063/1.1750872 ↗
53. Zur statistik der kristallisationsvorgänge in metallen
54. Diffusion-limited growth of precipitate particles10.1063/1.1734993 ↗
55. The kinetics of the first stage of tempering10.1016/0001-6160(59)90141-5 ↗
56. A transformation kinetic model and its application to Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloys—I. Isothermal conditions10.1016/0956-7151(90)90009-6 ↗
57. The use of the JMAYK kinetic equation for the analysis of solid-state reactions: critical considerations and recent interpretations10.1016/0040-6031(95)02554-5 ↗
58. An analysis method for nucleation and growth controlled reactions at constant heating rate10.1016/S0040-6031(96)03135-8 ↗
59. Christian · 2002
60. On the meaning of the impingement parameter in kinetic equations for nucleation and growth reactions10.1023/A:1017974517877 ↗
61. Kinetic equations for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions10.1023/A:1018649823542 ↗
62. Mechanisms of combined GP zone and θ′ precipitation in an Al–Cu alloy10.1023/A:1018588922845 ↗
63. β′ and β precipitation in an Al–Mg alloy studied by DSC and TEM10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00053-6 ↗
64. Microstrucure and strengthening of Al–Li–Cu–Mg alloys and MMCs: I. Analysis and modelling of microstructural changes10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00227-X ↗
65. Kinetics of the decomposition of austenite at constant temperature
66. Growth kinetics of grain-boundary precipitates10.1016/0001-6160(68)90081-3 ↗
67. On the coarsening of precipitates located on grain boundaries and dislocations10.1016/0956-7151(91)90179-5 ↗
68. Interfacial free energies and solute diffusivities from data on Ostwald ripening10.1007/BF00207013 ↗
69. Kozeschnik · 2013
70. Callister · 2003
71. Hillert · Jernkont. Ann. · 1957 · 141 · 757
72. 1984
73. 63Cu NMR analysis of microstructure evolution in Al–Cu–Mg alloys10.1080/14786430412331325021 ↗
74. Early stage hardening in AlCuMg alloy studied by 63Cu nuclear magnetic resonance and positron annihilation10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.519-521.1355 ↗
75. Solute clustering in Al–Cu–Mg alloys during the early stages of elevated temperature ageing10.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.020 ↗
76. Natural ageing of Al–Cu–Mg revisited from a local perspective10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.002 ↗