Geometrically necessary dislocation density distributions in cyclically deformed Ti–6Al–4V
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Cross-correlation-based electron backscattering diffraction analysis has been used to map lattice rotations in Ti–6Al–4V polycrystals deformed by load-controlled fatigue and dwell fatigue including a hold at maximum load. The lattice curvatures were used to form lower bound estimates of the geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) density distributions. In all cases the density of 〈 a 〉-type GNDs was much higher than for 〈 c + a 〉-type GNDs. As for tensile deformation the GND density histograms were significantly skewed toward the high density side. Observations of interrupted fatigue tests suggested that the density of 〈 a 〉-type GNDs decreases during continued cyclic loading, presumably due to the formation of tightly bound dipoles and multipole structures. As has been proposed in models of facet fatigue formation, an example is presented of the accumulation, within a soft grain, of GNDs in a diffuse pile-up against a grain boundary with a hard grain.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Jones · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 95110.1016/0001-6160(81)90049-3 ↗
2. Akhtar · Metall Trans · 1975 · A6 · 110510.1007/BF02661366 ↗
3. Akhtar · Metall Trans A · 1975 · 6 · 220110.1007/BF02818644 ↗
4. Churchman · Proc Roy Soc Lond A Mater · 1954 · 226 · 21610.1098/rspa.1954.0250 ↗
5. Conrad · Prog Mater Sci · 1981 · 26 · 12310.1016/0079-6425(81)90001-3 ↗
6. Gong · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 569310.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.064 ↗
7. Fisher · Phys Rev A – Gen Phys · 1964 · 135 · A48210.1103/PhysRev.135.A482 ↗
8. Gong · Philos Mag Lett · 2010 · 90 · 50310.1080/09500831003772989 ↗
9. Nye · Acta Metall · 1953 · 1 · 15310.1016/0001-6160(53)90054-6 ↗
10. Britton · Proc Roy Soc Lond A Mater · 2010 · 466 · 69510.1098/rspa.2009.0455 ↗
11. Busso · J Mech Phys Solids · 2000 · 48 · 233310.1016/S0022-5096(00)00006-5 ↗
12. Cheong · Int J Plasticity · 2005 · 21 · 179710.1016/j.ijplas.2004.11.001 ↗
13. Dunne · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2008 · 31 · 94910.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01284.x ↗
14. Dunne · Int J Plasticity · 2007 · 23 · 106110.1016/j.ijplas.2006.10.013 ↗
15. Dunne · Int J Plasticity · 2007 · 23 · 27310.1016/j.ijplas.2006.07.001 ↗
16. Bache · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2001 · 319 · 40910.1016/S0921-5093(00)02034-7 ↗
17. Bowen · Acta Metall · 1975 · 23 · 140110.1016/0001-6160(75)90149-2 ↗
18. Peters · Metall Trans A · 1984 · 15 · 159710.1007/BF02657799 ↗
19. Bache · J Mater Sci · 1997 · 32 · 343510.1023/A:1018624801310 ↗
20. Bridier · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 395110.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.036 ↗
21. Metall Trans A
22. Le Biavant · Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct · 2002 · 25 · 52710.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00480.x ↗
23. Sinha · J Mater Sci · 2007 · 42 · 833410.1007/s10853-006-0252-z ↗
24. Bantounas · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 358410.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.018 ↗
25. Britton · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 63910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.01.010 ↗
26. Germain · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 429810.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.065 ↗
27. Rugg · J Strain Anal Eng · 2007 · 42 · 26910.1243/03093247JSA273 ↗
28. Littlewood · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 648910.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.016 ↗
29. Quested · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 274310.1016/0001-6160(88)90120-4 ↗
30. Wilkinson · Acta Metall Et Mater · 1991 · 39 · 304710.1016/0956-7151(91)90037-2 ↗
31. Wilkinson · Acta Metall Et Mater · 1992 · 40 · 335710.1016/0956-7151(92)90049-K ↗
32. Brewer · J Mater Res · 2006 · 21 · 177510.1557/jmr.2006.0199 ↗
33. Field · Ultramicroscopy · 2005 · 103 · 3310.1016/j.ultramic.2004.11.016 ↗
34. Kamaya · Nucl Eng Des · 2005 · 235 · 71310.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.11.006 ↗
35. Kamaya · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 53910.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.046 ↗
36. Lehockey · 2000 · 247
37. Merriman · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2008 · 494 · 2810.1016/j.msea.2007.10.090 ↗
38. Pantleon · Scripta Materialia · 2008 · 58 · 99410.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050 ↗
39. Sun · Philos Mag A · 2000 · 80 · 910.1080/01418610008212038 ↗
40. Wilkinson · Philos Mag · 2010 · 90 · 115910.1080/14786430903304145 ↗
41. Karamched · Acta Mater · 2010 · 59 · 26310.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.030 ↗
42. Calcagnotto · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2010 · 527 · 273810.1016/j.msea.2010.01.004 ↗
43. Demir · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 55910.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.039 ↗
44. Littlewood · Int J Fatigue · 2012 · 11110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.03.001 ↗
45. Stroh · Proc Roy Soc Lond A Mater · 1954 · 223 · 40410.1098/rspa.1954.0124 ↗
46. Evans · Int J Fatigue · 1994 · 16 · 44310.1016/0142-1123(94)90194-5 ↗
47. Hughes · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 10510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00153-X ↗