journal article·2020-03-05

Rigid Amorphous Fraction and Thermal Diffusivity in Nanocomposites Based on Poly(l-lactic acid) Filled with Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene Oxide

Panagiotis A. Klonos, Vasileios Peoglos, Dimitrios N. Bikiaris, Apostolos Kyritsis

Publisher page

Abstract

The fraction of the polymer located at the nanoparticle–polymer interface in polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) [interfacial rigid amorphous fraction (RAF filler )] is under extensive investigation as it is generally considered responsible for the modified properties of PNCs as compared to the neat polymers. In semicrystalline PNCs, an additional interfacial polymer exists in the vicinity of crystals, that is, the RAF crystal, with the properties of the latter (structure and dynamics) being also under investigation. While the presence of nanoparticles and/or crystals themselves can be directly correlated with the modified PNC properties (e.g., mechanical performance), the respective direct effects of the RAFs have been rarely demonstrated. In a recent work, we studied RAF in PNCs based on two different polymers, amorphous stryrene butadiene rubber, wherein RAF = RAF filler, and semicrystalline low-density polyethylene wherein RAF ≈ RAF crystal, filled with carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and we revealed quite systematic dependences of thermal diffusivity α on the amount of RAF at each matrix. Strikingly, the α(RAF) trends were diverse for the two matrices, namely, RAF crystal, which facilitates heat transport, and RAF filler, which hinders heat transport. In the present work, we checked the latter α(RAF) trends in different PNCs based however on the same polylactide matrix at the amorphous and semicrystalline states, filled with small amounts of thermally conductive CNTs and graphene oxide platelets. Results for α(RAF) here were interestingly found similar with those in the previous study. These findings supply additional evidence for the different structural characteristics exhibited by the two types of RAF, a still open debate in the literature; namely, polymer chains exhibit higher level of ordering in RAF crystal as compared to RAF filler . Finally, we propose that RAF filler can be used as a measure of the phonon’s scattering in PNCs, whereas RAF crystal in conjunction with bulk crystallites forms additional thermal diffusion paths.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, Athens 15780, Greece

Department of Chemistry, Laboratory of Polymer Chemistry and Technology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki GR-541 24, Greece

References (91)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.01410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.014 ↗
2. 10.1039/C1RA00260K10.1039/C1RA00260K ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-10085610.1146/annurev-chembioeng-073009-100856 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2011.01.029 ↗
5. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.4310.3144/expresspolymlett.2018.43 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.04810.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.048 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.10.06310.1016/j.polymer.2011.10.063 ↗
8. 10.1021/ma401443v10.1021/ma401443v ↗
9. 10.1021/ma400107q10.1021/ma400107q ↗
10. 10.1021/ma500031710.1021/ma5000317 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0193110.1021/acs.macromol.6b01931 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.08010.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.080 ↗
13. 10.1021/ma400461p10.1021/ma400461p ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b0062710.1021/acs.macromol.7b00627 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0035410.1021/acs.macromol.6b00354 ↗
16. Netravali A. N. · 201610.1002/9781119185093 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.03830210.1103/PhysRevLett.116.038302 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.11570210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.115702 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0124010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b01240 ↗
20. 10.1002/polb.2475110.1002/polb.24751 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0062410.1021/acs.macromol.5b00624 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.01110.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.011 ↗
23. 10.1021/ma902175r10.1021/ma902175r ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.04510.1016/j.polymer.2011.04.045 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0724710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b07247 ↗
26. 10.1002/polb.2168110.1002/polb.21681 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2409310.1002/pc.24093 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2005.02.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.06910.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.069 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.00310.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.01510.1016/j.polymertesting.2016.11.015 ↗
33. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1131010.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11310 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.500688910.1063/1.5006889 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.00310.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.003 ↗
36. Gedde U. W. · 1995
37. 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.03810.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.038 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0197944610.1007/BF01979446 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.03310.1016/j.polymer.2010.07.033 ↗
40. 10.1021/ma035961n10.1021/ma035961n ↗
41. 10.1021/ma101035h10.1021/ma101035h ↗
42. 10.1021/ma301090710.1021/ma3010907 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.02810.1016/j.polymer.2018.11.028 ↗
44. 10.1021/ma502573610.1021/ma5025736 ↗
45. 10.1002/polc.507015011810.1002/polc.5070150118 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00278-110.1016/S0032-3861(02)00278-1 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0083310.1021/acs.macromol.8b00833 ↗
48. 10.1039/c4ra00500g10.1039/c4ra00500g ↗
49. 10.1039/C8SM02478B10.1039/C8SM02478B ↗
50. 10.3390/molecules2415279410.3390/molecules24152794 ↗
51. Rohsenow W. M. · 1998
52. 10.1039/c9cp02397f10.1039/c9cp02397f ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apmt.2018.04.00410.1016/j.apmt.2018.04.004 ↗
54. 10.1002/adma.20170554410.1002/adma.201705544 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.165871910.1063/1.1658719 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0137710.1021/acs.jpcb.7b01377 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0995510.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09955 ↗
58. 10.1039/c6cp06643g10.1039/c6cp06643g ↗
59. 10.1109/MEI.2011.595406410.1109/MEI.2011.5954064 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.36520910.1063/1.365209 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.180887410.1063/1.1808874 ↗
62. 10.1021/jp109978x10.1021/jp109978x ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0065110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00651 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.tca.2017.12.02010.1016/j.tca.2017.12.020 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.11.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.11.003 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b0038410.1021/acs.macromol.6b00384 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.00510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.07.005 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.07.00210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.07.002 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.04010.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.040 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.00310.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.003 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.tca.2014.10.00710.1016/j.tca.2014.10.007 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.tca.2015.08.02010.1016/j.tca.2015.08.020 ↗
73. 10.1007/BF0149892710.1007/BF01498927 ↗
74. 10.1063/1.172841710.1063/1.1728417 ↗
75. 10.1063/1.172956410.1063/1.1729564 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.00410.1016/j.compscitech.2015.02.004 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.03110.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.031 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.09.02810.1016/j.polymer.2003.09.028 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.04.07210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.04.072 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.01410.1016/j.polymer.2006.10.014 ↗
81. 10.1021/ma900794t10.1021/ma900794t ↗
82. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.04110.1016/j.polymer.2019.01.041 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.tca.2018.05.01210.1016/j.tca.2018.05.012 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.02010.1016/j.polymer.2018.02.020 ↗
85. 10.1016/0032-3861(96)81092-510.1016/0032-3861(96)81092-5 ↗
86. 10.1016/S0378-3812(01)00492-710.1016/S0378-3812(01)00492-7 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12159510.1016/j.polymer.2019.121595 ↗
88. 10.1021/acsmacrolett.8b0045610.1021/acsmacrolett.8b00456 ↗
89. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b0839810.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08398 ↗
90. 10.1039/C6RA27768C10.1039/C6RA27768C ↗
91. 10.1007/s10853-018-2486-y10.1007/s10853-018-2486-y ↗