journal article·2019-02-14

The Cathode Composition, A Key Player in the Success of Li-Metal Solid-State Batteries

Andrea I. Pitillas Martinez, Frédéric Aguesse, Laida Otaegui, Meike Schneider, Andreas Roters, Anna Llordés, Lucienne Buannic

Publisher page

Abstract

Polymer–ceramic composite electrolytes are major contenders for applications in commercial Li-metal solid-state batteries. However, the cycling performance and energy density of such batteries are not only related to the capabilities of the electrolyte but also to that of the cathode. Here, we investigate the influence of the formulation of a LiFePO 4 cathode, paying close attention to the fraction of the catholyte, on the electrochemical performance of a Li-metal solid-state battery and its theoretical energy density. The ionic conductivity and stripping/plating ability of the polymer–ceramic (PEO–LiTFSI–Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 ) composite electrolyte are first evaluated before assessing its C-rate performance and cycle life using a Li-metal anode and a LiFePO 4 cathode with a competitive active material loading (≈1 mA h·cm –2 ). It appears that a fraction of catholyte between 30 and 40 vol % is enough to ensure good interfacial contact and ionic transport throughout the cell. It is estimated that, under certain hypotheses, the cells could provide average energy densities of up to 185 W h·kg –1 and 345 W h·L –1, which are well above what are currently reported in the state of the art, because of the high cathode loading targeted in this study. Finally, recommendations for achieving energy density values close to the ones needed for electric vehicle applications (350 W h·kg –1 and 750 W h·L –1 ) are proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

CIC Energigune, Parque Tecnológico de Alava, 01510 Miñano, Spain

Schott AG, Hattenbergstraße 10, 55122 Mainz, Germany

IKERBASQUE, The Basque Foundation for Science, Maria Diaz de Haro 3, 48013 Bilbao, Spain

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung · Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science · Eusko Jaurlaritza

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c6ta07384k10.1039/c6ta07384k ↗
2. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.14110.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
3. 10.1016/0167-2738(94)90408-110.1016/0167-2738(94)90408-1 ↗
4. Bekaert, E.; Buannic, L.; Lassi, U.; Llordés, A.; Salminen, J. In Emerging Nanotechnologies in Rechargeable Energy Storage Systems; Rodriguez, L., Omar, N., Eds. Elsevier: Boston, 2017; pp 1–43.10.1016/B978-0-323-42977-1.00001-7 ↗
5. 10.1021/cm500806910.1021/cm5008069 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0536910.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05369 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.5b0751710.1021/acsami.5b07517 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0408210.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.07810.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.078 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.16210.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.162 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.170848911410.1073/pnas.1708489114 ↗
12. 10.1021/jacs.7b0636410.1021/jacs.7b06364 ↗
13. 10.1149/2.0731504jes10.1149/2.0731504jes ↗
14. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.14110.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.141 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b1630410.1021/acsami.6b16304 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.02510.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.025 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.23410.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.234 ↗
18. 10.1039/c6ta10066j10.1039/c6ta10066j ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.07.01310.1016/j.ssi.2016.07.013 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11581-016-1905-910.1007/s11581-016-1905-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.01410.1016/j.ssi.2016.04.014 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.01410.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.04.014 ↗
23. 10.1039/c4cs00020j10.1039/c4cs00020j ↗
24. 10.1149/1.240976810.1149/1.2409768 ↗
25. United States Advanced Battery Consortium. EV Battery Goals. http://www.uscar.org/guest/article_view.php?articles_id=85 (accessed November 2017).