journal article·2014-05-22

Car–Parrinello Molecular Dynamics + Metadynamics Study of High-Temperature Methanol Oxidation Reactions Using Generic Collective Variables

Shaohui Zheng, Jim Pfaendtner

The Journal of Physical Chemistry C· Volume 118· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

We used Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics (CPMD) and metadynamics in conjunction with the recently introduced social permutation invariant collective coordinates to study the mechanism of high-temperature methanol oxidation. Using a set of biased MD trajectories, we collected specific elementary reactions that arise during the simulations and assembled their connectivity in a small reaction network. A subset of the reaction network generated with metadynamics is compared to a consensus reaction network generated from many literature sources, and the many similarities indicate that this approach may be a useful way to enumerate bimolecular radical reactions in complex systems. We also demonstrated some intrinsic similarities to atomic contact maps used in our metadynamics approach and the reaction matrix/operators that are found in common mechanism generation algorithms. Extending the capabilities of these new generic collective variables for the study of complex reaction networks can help overcome limitations of enhanced sampling methods in the study of chemical reactions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Free Radicals and Antioxidants · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1750, United States

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Car R. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1985 · 55 · 247110.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2471 ↗
2. Laio A. · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2008 · 71 · 12660110.1088/0034-4885/71/12/126601 ↗
3. Barducci A. · Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2011 · 1 · 826
4. Iannuzzi M. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 23830210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.238302 ↗
5. Ensing B. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2006 · 39 · 7310.1021/ar040198i ↗
6. Gallet G. A. · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2012 · 8 · 402910.1021/ct300581n ↗
7. Stirling A. · ChemPhysChem · 2004 · 5 · 155810.1002/cphc.200400063 ↗
8. Boero M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2004 · 126 · 628010.1021/ja049363f ↗
9. Branduardi D. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2007 · 126 · 05410310.1063/1.2432340 ↗
10. Tribello G. A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2012 · 109 · 519610.1073/pnas.1201152109 ↗
11. Tribello G. A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2010 · 107 · 1750910.1073/pnas.1011511107 ↗
12. Ceriotti M. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2011 · 108 · 1302310.1073/pnas.1108486108 ↗
13. Pietrucci F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 08550410.1103/PhysRevLett.107.085504 ↗
14. Held T. J. · Int. J. Chem. Kinet. · 1998 · 30 · 80510.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1998)30:11<805::AID-KIN4>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
15. Li J. · Int. J. Chem. Kinet. · 2007 · 39 · 10910.1002/kin.20218 ↗
16. Skodje R. T. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2010 · 114 · 828610.1021/jp1047002 ↗
17. Tsang W. · J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data · 1987 · 16 · 47110.1063/1.555802 ↗
18. Klippenstein S. J. · Proc. Combust. Inst. · 2011 · 33 · 35110.1016/j.proci.2010.05.066 ↗
19. Jasper A. W. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2007 · 111 · 393210.1021/jp067585p ↗
20. Car R. · Solid State Commun. · 1987 · 62 · 40310.1016/0038-1098(87)91043-X ↗
21. Bonomi M. · Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2009 · 180 · 196110.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011 ↗
22. Becke A. D. · Phys. Rev. A · 1988 · 38 · 309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
23. Lee C. · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
24. Troullier N. · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
25. Kleinman L. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1982 · 48 · 142510.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1425 ↗
26. Nose S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1984 · 81 · 51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
27. Hoover W. G. · Phys. Rev. A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
28. Laio A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2002 · 99 · 1256210.1073/pnas.202427399 ↗
29. Balaban A. T. · J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. · 1991 · 31 · 51710.1021/ci00004a014 ↗
30. Randic M. · J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. · 1975 · 15 · 10510.1021/ci60002a007 ↗
31. Bucko T. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2008 · 20
32. Wang H. · Combust. Flame · 2013 · 160 · 22210.1016/j.combustflame.2012.09.012 ↗
33. Frisch M. J. · 2009
34. Codorniu-Hernandez E. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 53210.1021/ja208874t ↗
35. Codorniu-Hernandez E. · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2011 · 7 · 372510.1021/ct200418e ↗
36. Agarwal V. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 1495810.1021/ja305135u ↗
37. Pilling M. J. · Proc. Combust. Inst · 2009 · 32 · 2710.1016/j.proci.2008.08.003 ↗
38. Broadbelt L. J. · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 1994 · 33 · 79010.1021/ie00028a003 ↗
39. Green, W. H.; Allen, J. W.; Buesser, B. A.; Ashcraft, R. W.; Beran, G. J.; Class, C. A.; Gao, C.; Goldsmith, C. F.; Harper, M. R.; Jalan, A.;RMG—Reaction Mechanism Generator, v4.0.1,http://rmg.sourceforge.net/, 2013.
40. Branduardi D. · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2012 · 8 · 224710.1021/ct3002464 ↗