journal article·2012-03

Internal strain and texture development during twinning: Comparing neutron diffraction measurements with crystal plasticity finite-element approaches

Hamidreza Abdolvand, Mark R. Daymond

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Different approaches to the modeling of twinning are examined within the framework of a crystal plasticity finite-element code. The model predictions are compared with in situ neutron diffraction experiments previously carried out on zirconium and magnesium alloys. The experiments are used to evaluate different model assumptions regarding the stress state inside newly formed twins at inception, as well as different assumptions concerning the interaction between twin and parent grain during subsequent twin growth. In particular the relaxation in some grain orientations that is experimentally observed, and is associated with twin-induced stress relief, can be captured by the model under appropriate assumptions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Asaro · J Mech Phys Solids · 1977 · 25 · 30910.1016/0022-5096(77)90001-1 ↗
2. Asaro · J Appl Mech · 1983 · 50 · 92110.1115/1.3167205 ↗
3. Asaro · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 92310.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-9 ↗
4. Kalidindi · J Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 46 · 26710.1016/S0022-5096(97)00051-3 ↗
5. Van Houtte · Acta Metall · 1978 · 26 · 59110.1016/0001-6160(78)90111-6 ↗
6. Tome’ · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 266710.1016/0956-7151(91)90083-D ↗
7. Lebensohn · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 261110.1016/0956-7151(93)90130-K ↗
8. Proust · Int J Plast · 2009 · 25 · 86110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005 ↗
9. Muransky · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 138310.1016/j.msea.2009.10.018 ↗
10. Clausen · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 245610.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.057 ↗
11. Proust · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 213710.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.017 ↗
12. Agnew · Int J Plast · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
13. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 484110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.020 ↗
14. Xu · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 367210.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.019 ↗
15. Mareau · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 331310.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.005 ↗
16. Xu · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 394 · 910.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.07.006 ↗
17. Abdolvand · Int J Plast · 2011 · 27 · 172110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.04.005 ↗
18. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 473 · 13910.1016/j.msea.2007.04.021 ↗
19. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 272510.1016/j.msea.2010.12.062 ↗
20. Xu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 488 · 17210.1016/j.msea.2007.11.018 ↗
21. Roters · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 115210.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.058 ↗
22. Staroselsky · Int J Plast · 2003 · 19 · 184310.1016/S0749-6419(03)00039-1 ↗
23. Le’vesque · Int J Plast · 2010 · 26 · 6510.1016/j.ijplas.2009.05.001 ↗
24. Staroselsky · J Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 46 · 67110.1016/S0022-5096(97)00071-9 ↗
25. Aydiner CC, Bernier JV, Clausen B, Lienert U, Tome’ CN, Brown DW. Phys Rev B 2009; 80: 024113.10.1103/PhysRevB.80.024113 ↗
26. ABAQUS. Standard user’s manual version 6.5. Habbitt, Karrlsson & Sorensen Inc.; 2005.
27. Wang · Int J Solids Struct · 2010 · 47 · 290510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.06.016 ↗
28. Fisher · Phys Rev · 1964 · 135 · 48210.1103/PhysRev.135.A482 ↗
29. Simmons · 1971
30. Mareau C, Daymond MR, in preparation.
31. Daymond · Rev Mineral Geochem · 2006 · 63 · 42710.2138/rmg.2006.63.16 ↗
32. Beyerlein · Proc Roy Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci · 2010 · 466 · 251710.1098/rspa.2009.0661 ↗