journal article·2012-06

Observation of recovery and recrystallization in high-purity aluminum measured with forward modeling analysis of high-energy diffraction microscopy

Christopher M. Hefferan, Jonathan Lind, Shiu Fai Li, Ulrich Lienert, Anthony D. Rollett, Robert M. Suter

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

High-energy X-ray diffraction microscopy is a non-destructive materials characterization technique that is capable of tracking the evolution of three-dimensional microstructures as they respond to external stimuli. We present measurements of the annealing response of high-purity aluminum using the near-field variant of this technique. The data are analyzed with the forward modeling method which produces orientation maps that exhibit complex intragranular structures. Analysis and verification of results use both reconstructed sample space maps and detector space intensity patterns. Sensitivity to the ordering of the microstructure through both recovery and recrystallization is demonstrated. Sharpening of diffraction peaks and a corresponding reduction in intragranular orientation variations signal recovery processes. The emergence of a new bulk grain (recrystallization) is observed in a disordered region of the microstructure; the new grain has an orientation with no obvious relation to those of grains surrounding the disordered region.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Humphreys · 1995
2. Poulsen · 2004
3. Suter · Rev Sci Instrum · 2006 · 77 · 110.1063/1.2400017 ↗
4. Lienert · J Miner Metals Mater Soc · 2011 · 63 · 7010.1007/s11837-011-0116-0 ↗
5. Liu · Ultramicroscopy · 2005 · 103 · 19910.1016/j.ultramic.2004.11.022 ↗
6. Larson · Nature · 2002 · 415 · 88710.1038/415887a ↗
7. Johnson · J Appl Crystallogr · 2008 · 41 · 31010.1107/S0021889808001726 ↗
8. Ludwig · J Appl Crystallogr · 2008 · 41 · 30210.1107/S0021889808001684 ↗
9. Ludwig · Rev Sci Instrum · 2009 · 80 · 110.1063/1.3100200 ↗
10. Gundlach · Scr Mater · 2004 · 50 · 47710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.10.034 ↗
11. Lauridsen · Scr Mater · 2000 · 43 · 56110.1016/S1359-6462(00)00430-9 ↗
12. Offerman · Science · 2002 · 298 · 100310.1126/science.1076681 ↗
13. Lauridsen · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 442310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00278-7 ↗
14. Schmidt · Science · 2004 · 305 · 22910.1126/science.1098627 ↗
15. Larsen · Scr Mater · 2005 · 53 · 55310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.053 ↗
16. Lauridsen · Scr Mater · 2006 · 55 · 5110.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.028 ↗
17. Rollett · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 2007 · 37 · 62710.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084401 ↗
18. Hefferan · Powder Diffr · 2010 · 25 · 13210.1154/1.3427328 ↗
19. Hefferan · Comput Mater Continuat · 2009 · 14 · 209
20. Li SF. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2011.
21. Characterization of lattice defects and concomitant strain distribution
22. Mapping and assessing plastic deformation using EBSD
23. Doherty · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 238 · 21910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00424-3 ↗
24. Duggan B. ICOTOM 11, 1996; as quoted in [15].10.1215/01636545-1996-64-31 ↗