journal article·2013-01Open access

Investigation of the martensitic transformation and the damping behavior of a superelastic Ti–Ta–Nb alloy

E. Bertrand, P. Castany, T. Gloriant

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract In this study the α″ stress-induced martensitic transformation and damping behaviour of the superelastic β-Ti–25Ta–25Nb alloy are investigated by tensile tests at room temperature and by dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) in tensile mode for different applied stresses. Tensile tests show a fully non-linear elastic domain and, consequently, a specific method is proposed to determine the elastic modulus. Due to the wide range of temperature over which the martensitic transformation occurs in this class of alloys, the martensitic start temperature, M s , is not a relevant parameter to characterize the transformation and the temperature M max corresponding to the temperature of maximum transformation is used. The important gap between these two temperatures explains the fully non-linear elastic behaviour of this alloy during conventional tensile tests. It is observed that two main damping sources occur in this alloy: friction at austenite/martensite interfaces during the martensitic transformation and friction at martensite/martensite interfaces at lower temperature. However, a third unexpected damping peak is also observed at high stress. Its origin is discussed with respect to the orientation of the applied stress and with regard to the most favourably oriented martensite variants determined by Schmid factor analysis.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Lovey · Prog Mater Sci · 1999 · 44 · 18910.1016/S0079-6425(99)00004-3 ↗
2. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
3. Nowick · Prog Metal Phys · 1953 · 4 · 110.1016/0502-8205(53)90014-8 ↗
4. Liu · J Alloys Compd · 1997 · 247 · 11510.1016/S0925-8388(96)02572-8 ↗
5. Mercier · Acta Metall · 1979 · 27 · 146710.1016/0001-6160(79)90169-X ↗
6. Yin · Adv Mater · 2006 · 18 · 154110.1002/adma.200600128 ↗
7. Van Humbeeck · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · 273 · 13410.1016/S0921-5093(99)00293-2 ↗
8. Van Humbeeck · Smart Mater Struct · 2005 · 14 · S17110.1088/0964-1726/14/5/001 ↗
9. Van Humbeeck · Mater Sci Forum · 2000 · 327–3 · 33110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.327-328.331 ↗
10. Van Humbeeck · J Alloys Compd · 2003 · 355 · 5810.1016/S0925-8388(03)00268-8 ↗
11. Ghilarducci · Scripta Metall · 1980 · 14 · 134110.1016/0036-9748(80)90191-X ↗
12. Teus · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 377310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.008 ↗
13. Mazzolai · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 424310.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.020 ↗
14. Nowick · 1972
15. Kim · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 241910.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.019 ↗
16. Laheurte · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2010 · 3 · 56510.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.07.001 ↗
17. Bertrand · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2010 · 3 · 55910.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.06.007 ↗
18. Eisenbarth · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 5705
19. Ramarolahy · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2012 · 9 · 8310.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.01.017 ↗
20. Buenconsejo · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 111410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.004 ↗
21. Besse · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 598210.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.006 ↗
22. Inamura · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 253510.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.040 ↗
23. Yin · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 521/522 · 37210.1016/j.msea.2008.09.090 ↗
24. Lu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2012 · 541 · 2810.1016/j.msea.2012.01.113 ↗
25. Mantani · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 31510.1016/j.msea.2006.02.180 ↗
26. Mantani · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 442 · 40910.1016/j.msea.2006.03.124 ↗
27. Zhou · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 384 · 9210.1016/j.msea.2004.05.084 ↗
28. Raabe · Scripta Metall Mater · 1992 · 27 · 153310.1016/0956-716X(92)90140-A ↗
29. Sander · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 479 · 23610.1016/j.msea.2007.06.077 ↗
30. Kim · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 42310.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.014 ↗
31. Oka · Metall Mater Trans A · 1979 · 10 · 65110.1007/BF02658330 ↗
32. Castany · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 02020110.1103/PhysRevB.84.020201 ↗
33. Bertrand · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 111010.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.033 ↗
34. Castany · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 66 · 37110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.11.036 ↗
35. Elias · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 432 · 10810.1016/j.msea.2006.06.013 ↗
36. Buenconsejo · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 106810.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.041 ↗
37. Miyazaki · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 1810.1016/j.msea.2006.02.054 ↗
38. Al-Zain · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 146410.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.008 ↗
39. Pérez-Landazábal · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 22410110.1103/PhysRevB.73.224101 ↗
40. Salje · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 13411410.1103/PhysRevB.80.134114 ↗
41. Christian · Metall Trans A · 1982 · 13 · 50910.1007/BF02644415 ↗
42. Chai · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 405410.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.051 ↗
43. Inamura · Phil Mag · 2007 · 87 · 332510.1080/14786430601003874 ↗