Magnetic Properties of Hematite Nanotubes Elaborated by Electrospinning Process
Source abstract
Abstract
Hematite nanotubes are successfully prepared using an electrospinning technique and studied by superconducting quantum interference device magnetometry. At room temperature, the hysteresis properties observed are strongly controlled by the size of the nanofibers. The coercivity force increases with the average diameter while the remnant magnetization decreases. The moment versus temperature data for samples with different nanotubes’ average diameter show two magnetic transitions assigned to Morin transitions. The origin of this phenomenon is traced to the presence of very thin nanotubes responsible for an additional Morin transition at low temperature. As a consequence, and based on previous works, a phenomenological description of the influence of hematite nanostructures size on the Morin temperature is proposed for the first time.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratoire de Physique Appliquée (LPA) associé à l’école doctorale des Sciences et Technologies, Département de Physique, Université Libanaise, Faculté des Sciences II, 90656 Jdeidet El Metn, Lebanon
Laboratoire des Multimatériaux et Interfaces (UMR CNRS 5615), Université Lyon1, Université de Lyon, 43 Bd du 11 Novembre 1918, Villeurbanne Cedex, France
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Bachmann J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2007 · 129 · 955410.1021/ja072465w ↗
2. Escrig J. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 308 · 23310.1016/j.jmmm.2006.05.019 ↗
3. Xie J. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 10510110.1088/0957-4484/19/10/105101 ↗
4. Brumlik C. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1991 · 113 · 317410.1021/ja00008a057 ↗
5. Sui Y. C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2004 · 84 · 152510.1063/1.1655692 ↗
6. Liu L. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1521810.1021/jp0627473 ↗
7. Graeser M. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 424410.1002/adma.200700849 ↗
8. Tang B. · Inorg. Chem. · 2006 · 45 · 519610.1021/ic060097b ↗
9. Hansen M. F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 112410.1103/PhysRevB.62.1124 ↗
10. Zysler R. D. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 272 · 157510.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.1128 ↗
11. Mansilla M. V. · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 226 · 190710.1016/S0304-8853(00)00858-1 ↗
12. Bhowmik R. N. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 05391610.1063/1.3327433 ↗
13. Hill H. · Chem. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 489110.1021/cm800009s ↗
14. Eid C. · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 12570110.1088/0957-4484/21/12/125701 ↗
15. Barakat N. A. M. · Polymer · 2009 · 50 · 438910.1016/j.polymer.2009.07.005 ↗
16. Zeng S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 27410.1021/jp909111j ↗
17. Graeser M. · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 424410.1002/adma.200700849 ↗
18. Wang Z. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 1517110.1021/jp802614v ↗
19. Williamson D. L. · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 189910.1103/PhysRevB.34.1899 ↗
20. Zhao Y. · Chem. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 91610.1021/cm062375a ↗
21. Xu Y. Y. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 410 · 3610.1016/j.cplett.2005.04.090 ↗
22. Özdemir Ö. · Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. · 2008 · 9 · Q10Z0110.1029/2008GC002110 ↗
23. Goya G. F. · Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Proc. · 2005 · 80 · 152310.1007/s00339-003-2381-4 ↗
24. Gee S. H. · Spin IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 269110.1109/TMAG.2004.832253 ↗