The thermodynamics of hydride precipitation: The importance of entropy, enthalpy and disorder
Source abstract
Abstract
The thermodynamics of H/α-Zr solid solution and zirconium hydride phases were studied using density functional theory. Disorder in ζ, γ and δ hydrides and solid solutions were modelled using a statistically significant number of randomly generated structures in combination with special quasi-random structures and solid solutions with a range of concentrations. This is used in conjunction with a calculation of thermodynamic parameters of the system, including the temperature dependent sensible enthalpy, configurational entropy and vibrational entropy of the different crystals in the system, developed from phonon density of states. It was found that precipitation of hydrides is not thermodynamically favourable for Zr-H solid solutions containing less than 300 ppm H, suggesting that a mechanism must cause local concentration of H atoms to a greater amount than found globally in experimental samples containing hydrides. Temperature drives the reaction in the direction of solution, primarily due to entropic effects. Generally, γ hydride is the most stable phase, although it is very close in energy to the δ-phase. The sensible enthalpy of precipitation assists in stabilising HCP hydrides, and the configurational entropy change during precipitation favours FCC hydrides. None of the thermodynamic contributions are found to be negligible in driving precipitation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Puls · 2012
2. Kearns · Atom Eng · 1967 · 22 · 292
3. Kearns · J Nucl Mater · 1972 · 43 · 33010.1016/0022-3115(72)90065-7 ↗
4. Barrow · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 43 · 39510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.013 ↗
5. Mallett · J Electrochem Soc · 1957 · 104 · 14210.1149/1.2428522 ↗
6. Ells · J Nucl Mater · 1968 · 28 · 12910.1016/0022-3115(68)90021-4 ↗
7. Raynauld P, Bielen A. Cladding hydrogen based regulations in the United States. Water reactor fuel performance meeting. Chengdu, China; 2011.
8. Kessler J, Einziger R. Technical bases for extended dry storage of spent nuclear fuel. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI; 2002.
9. Okamoto · J Phase Equilib Differ · 2006 · 27 · 54810.1007/BF02736475 ↗
10. Weatherly · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 50110.1016/0001-6160(81)90074-2 ↗
11. Zhao · J Microsc · 2008 · 232 · 41010.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02136.x ↗
12. Domain · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 351310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00173-8 ↗
13. Zhu · J Phys Chem C · 2010 · 114 · 2236110.1021/jp109185n ↗
14. Lanzani · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 324 · 16510.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.013 ↗
15. Root · J Nucl Mater · 1996 · 232 · 7510.1016/0022-3115(96)00379-0 ↗
16. Nath · J Nucl Mater · 1975 · 58 · 15310.1016/0022-3115(75)90101-4 ↗
17. Steuwer · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 14510.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.061 ↗
18. Burr · Corros Sci · 2013 · 69 · 110.1016/j.corsci.2012.11.036 ↗
19. Fukai · 1993
20. Glazoff MV, Modeling of some physical properties of zirconium alloys for nuclear applications in support of UFD campaign. Technical Report, Idaho National Laboratory; 2013.10.2172/1097164 ↗
21. Glazoff · J Nucl Mater · 2014 · 444 · 6510.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.09.038 ↗
22. Ackland · Phys Rev Lett · 1998 · 80 · 223310.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2233 ↗
23. Blomqvist J, Olofsson J, Alvarez A, Bjerk C, Structural and thermodynamical properties of zirconium hydrides from first principles. in: 15th international conference on environmental degradation of materials in nuclear power systems-water reactors; 2012.10.1002/9781118456835.ch70 ↗
24. Zhong · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 423 · 8710.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.01.016 ↗
25. Zunger · Phys Rev · 1990 · 65 · 353
26. Wang · Phys Chem Chem Phys · 2013 · 15 · 759910.1039/c3cp50624j ↗
27. Mao · APL Mater · 2013 · 1 · 04210310.1063/1.4822439 ↗
28. Akbarzadeh · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 18410210.1103/PhysRevB.79.184102 ↗
29. Clark · Z Kristallogr · 2005 · 220 · 56710.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
30. Vanderbilt · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
31. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
32. Methfessel · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 40 · 361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
33. Pfrommer · J Comput Phys · 1997 · 131 · 13310.1006/jcph.1996.5612 ↗
34. Barrow · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 432 · 36610.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.003 ↗
35. Baroni · Rev Mod Phys · 2001 · 73 · 51510.1103/RevModPhys.73.515 ↗
36. Frank · Phys Rev Lett · 1995 · 74 · 179110.1103/PhysRevLett.74.1791 ↗
37. Pickard · J Phys Cond Mat · 2011 · 23 · 05320110.1088/0953-8984/23/5/053201 ↗
38. Udagawa · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 392710.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.034 ↗
39. Burr · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 443 · 50210.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.060 ↗
40. Chambers J, Cleveland W, Kleiner B, Tukey P, Graphical methods for data analysis, Wadsworth; 1983.
41. Holliger · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.80.094111 ↗
42. Lide · 1999
43. Nicholson · Phys Rev B · 2012 · 86 · 13411310.1103/PhysRevB.86.134113 ↗
44. McRae · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 396 · 13010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.08.019 ↗
45. Puls · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 393 · 35010.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.06.022 ↗
46. Barraclough · J Nucl Mater · 1970 · 34 · 12510.1016/0022-3115(70)90112-1 ↗
47. Veleva · Metall Mater Trans A · 2003 · 34 · 56710.1007/s11661-003-0092-2 ↗
48. Bradbrook · J Nucl Mater · 1972 · 42 · 14210.1016/0022-3115(72)90021-9 ↗
49. Northwood · J Less Common Met · 1976 · 48 · 17310.1016/0022-5088(76)90243-5 ↗
50. Cann · J Nucl Mater · 1984 · 126 · 19710.1016/0022-3115(84)90029-1 ↗
51. Perovic · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 36310.1016/0956-7151(92)90310-B ↗
52. Tulk · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 425 · 9310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.051 ↗
53. Goldak · Phys Rev · 1966 · 144 · 48010.1103/PhysRev.144.478 ↗
54. McQuarrie · 1997