Effects of Ni concentration and aging conditions on multistage martensitic transformation in aged Ni-rich Ti–Ni alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effects of Ni concentration and aging conditions on the multistage martensitic transformation (MMT) in aged Ni-rich Ti–Ni alloys have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and in situ scanning electron microscopy. The effect of Ni concentration was evaluated using Ti–50.6, 50.8 and 51.0 at.% Ni alloys. These alloys were heat treated at 1223 K for 3.6 ks and then aged at 773 K for 3.6 ks. Although the triple-stage transformation appeared in the Ti–50.6 and 51 at.% Ni alloys during cooling, the transformation sequence of the two alloys was completely different. Quadruple-stage transformation was observed in the Ti–50.8 at.% Ni alloy. The characteristic microstructure responsible for the MMT in each of the aged alloys strongly depended on the degree of Ni supersaturation and the aging temperature and time. We have proposed and experimentally verified a general rule that explains the effects of Ni concentration and aging conditions on the microstructural changes and thus the MMT sequences. This will allow the MMT in Ni-rich Ti–Ni alloys to be controlled by selecting appropriate aging conditions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Ti–Ni shape memory alloys
2. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
3. Morawiec · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 35 · 48510.1016/1359-6462(96)00179-0 ↗
4. Liu · Mater Sci · 1997 · 32 · 597910.1023/A:1018615127911 ↗
5. Bataillard · Philos Mag A · 1998 · 78 · 32710.1080/01418619808241907 ↗
6. Khalil-Allafi · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 79310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00385-8 ↗
7. Khalil-Allafi · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 425510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00257-4 ↗
8. Dlouhy · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 33910.1080/0141861021000034531 ↗
9. Nishida · Mater Trans · 2003 · 44 · 263110.2320/matertrans.44.2631 ↗
10. Kim · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 48710.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.032 ↗
11. Carroll · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 18710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.020 ↗
12. Liu · Philos Mag A · 2004 · 84 · 208310.1080/14786430410001678262 ↗
13. Fan · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 435110.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.002 ↗
14. Fujishima · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 48910.1016/j.msea.2006.05.048 ↗
15. Fan · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 62210.1016/j.msea.2006.02.066 ↗
16. Chrobak · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 75710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.12.010 ↗
17. Chang · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 134110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.006 ↗
18. Michutta · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 352510.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.036 ↗
19. Chiang · J Alloys Comp · 2008 · 458 · 23110.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.006 ↗
20. Cao · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 178010.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.044 ↗
21. Karbakhsh Ravari · J Alloys Comp · 2013 · 577 · S26810.1016/j.jallcom.2012.03.041 ↗
22. Karbakhsh Ravari · Philos Mag · 2013 · 93 · 227910.1080/14786435.2013.769070 ↗
23. Itakura · J Electron Microsc · 2010 · 59 · 16510.1093/jmicro/dfq044 ↗
24. Frenzel · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 344410.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.019 ↗
25. Nishida · Philos Mag · 2012 · 92 · 221510.1080/14786435.2012.669858 ↗
26. Nishida · Philos Mag · 2012 · 92 · 223410.1080/14786435.2012.669860 ↗
27. Inamura · Philos Mag · 2012 · 92 · 224710.1080/14786435.2012.669859 ↗
28. Shabalovskaya · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481–482 · 43110.1016/j.msea.2007.01.177 ↗
29. Nishida · Metallography · 1988 · 21 · 25510.1016/0026-0800(88)90024-9 ↗
30. Hornbogen · Acta Metall · 1967 · 15 · 58410.1016/0001-6160(67)90099-5 ↗
31. Nishida · Scripta Metall · 1984 · 18 · 129910.1016/0036-9748(84)90126-1 ↗
32. Miyazaki · Metall Trans A · 1986 · 17 · 5310.1007/BF02644442 ↗