journal article·2009-09

Are some nanotwinned fcc metals optimal for strength, ductility and grain stability?

Yashashree Kulkarni, Robert J Asaro

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Here we investigate whether certain face-centered cubic metals display a superior behavior of nanotwinned structures compared to others. We also address the question of an optimal lamella thickness that yields maximum strength and stability. Our analysis of the intrinsic stacking fault energies, γ sf , and the unstable stacking fault energies, γ us , of Al, Pd, Cu and Ag, as well as our atomistic simulations of dislocation–twin boundary interactions in these metals, suggests an optimal behavior of nanotwinned Pd and Ag as competitive to Cu, and hence a special utility in their synthesis and further exploration. Our results also indicate that the influence of twin–twin interactions may lead to a loss of strength below a critical value of twin lamella thickness.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Sutton · 1995
2. Sansoz · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 193110.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.007 ↗
3. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
4. Lu · Science · 2009 · 323 · 60710.1126/science.1167641 ↗
5. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 519710.1063/1.1828213 ↗
6. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87 · 06192110.1063/1.2008377 ↗
7. Shute · Scr Mater · 2009 · 60 · 107310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.049 ↗
8. Kulkarni · Scr Mater · 2008 · 60 · 53210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.007 ↗
9. Lu · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 216910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.031 ↗
10. Dao · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 404110.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038 ↗
11. Asaro · Scr Mater · 2008 · 58 · 38910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.066 ↗
12. Zhu · PNAS · 2007 · 104 · 303110.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
13. Jin · Scr Mater · 2006 · 54 · 116310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.072 ↗
14. Dewald · Philos Mag · 2007 · 30 · 461510.1080/14786430701297590 ↗
15. Jin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 112610.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.020 ↗
16. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 21210410.1103/PhysRevB.75.212104 ↗
17. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
18. Asaro · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 336910.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗
19. Tadmor · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 250710.1016/j.jmps.2004.05.002 ↗
20. Kibey · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 684310.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.042 ↗
21. Plimpton · J Comp Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
22. Ercolessi · Europhys Lett · 1994 · 28 · 58310.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 ↗
23. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
24. Voter · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 1987 · 82 · 17510.1557/PROC-82-175 ↗
25. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
26. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 495310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
27. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 04190610.1063/1.2965637 ↗
28. Neiman · J Mater Res · 1991 · 6 · 101210.1557/JMR.1991.1012 ↗
29. Krill · Mater Sci Forum · 1996 · 225–227 · 26310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.225-227.263 ↗
30. Rosner · Philos Mag Lett · 2004 · 84 · 32110.1080/09500830410001675687 ↗
31. Lu · Science · 2009 · 324 · 34910.1126/science.1159610 ↗