Texture evolution during dynamic recrystallization in a magnesium alloy at 450°C
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract During thermomechanical processing of wrought magnesium alloys, the microstructure and texture continue to evolve as dynamic recrystallization (DRX) proceeds. New grains generated by DRX with a low dislocation density also participate in the texture evolution as the strain increases. However, the controlling mechanisms that drive the evolution are not yet understood. In this work, we studied texture evolution in an extruded Mg–Al–Mn alloy (AM30) during uniaxial compression at 450 °C and under various strain rates ( e 1.0 s - 1 ) . The tests were performed along the extrusion direction (ED) and the radial direction (RaD), respectively. Texture evolution was examined by electron backscatter diffraction and X-ray diffraction at different strains. At e 0.1 s - 1 , the effect of twinning was negligible. At e = 0.5 s - 1 , a high volume fraction of twins were activated but the twins were consumed by DRX as the strain increased. At e = 0.8 s - 1 , twins were not completely consumed by DRX, and the remaining twins had highly incoherent twin boundaries and contributed to the texture. In compression along the ED and with strain rates of ⩽0.5 s−1, prismatic slip dominated the texture evolution, and the final orientations clustered around 〈 1 0 1 ‾ 0 〉 ‖ ED and 〈 2 1 ‾ 1 ‾ 0 〉 || ED, resulting in two stable orientations with a 30° misorientation. At 0.8 s−1, basal and pyramidal slip began to dominate the texture evolution at larger strain. In compression along the RaD, basal and pyramidal slip dominated the texture evolution, creating a texture located near 〈 1 0 1 ‾ 2 〉 – 〈 1 0 1 ‾ 5 〉 – 〈 2 1 ‾ 1 ‾ 9 〉 – 〈 2 1 ‾ 1 ‾ 5 〉 and 〈 1 0 1 ‾ 0 〉 – 〈 2 1 ‾ 1 ‾ 0 〉 in the inverse pole figure. Texture simulations based on the Sachs and the viscoplastic self-consistent models show a satisfactory correlation between texture evolution and deformation modes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Ion · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 190910.1016/0001-6160(82)90031-1 ↗
2. Galiyev · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 119910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00020-9 ↗
3. Beer · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 185610.1007/s11661-007-9207-5 ↗
4. Al-Samman · Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · A490 · 41110.1016/j.msea.2008.02.004 ↗
5. Kaibyshev · Phys Met Metall · 2000 · 89 · 70
6. Yang · Mater Trans · 2003 · 44 · 19710.2320/matertrans.44.197 ↗
7. Martin · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 425310.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.017 ↗
8. Wu · Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · A527 · 52
9. Wang · Mater Sci Eng · 2011 · A528 · 294110.1016/j.msea.2010.11.069 ↗
10. Pong · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 37 · 176910.1016/S1359-6462(97)00346-1 ↗
11. Gourdet · Mater Sci Eng · 2000 · A283 · 27410.1016/S0921-5093(00)00733-4 ↗
12. Doherty · Mater Sci Eng · 1997 · A238 · 21910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00424-3 ↗
13. Ma · Mater Sci Eng · 2013 · A559 · 31410.1016/j.msea.2012.08.104 ↗
14. Ma · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 82310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.046 ↗
15. Kallend · Texture Microstruct · 1991 · 14–18 · 120310.1155/TSM.14-18.1203 ↗
16. Hielscher · J Appl Crystallogr · 2008 · 41 · 102410.1107/S0021889808030112 ↗
17. Al-Samman · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 53710.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.013 ↗
18. Nave · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 88110.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.07.002 ↗
19. Hong · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 14510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.030 ↗
20. Meyers · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 402510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
21. Ma · Metall Mater Trans A · 2013 · 44A · 448010.1007/s11661-013-1948-8 ↗
22. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
23. Ma · Int J Plast · 2012 · 29 · 6010.1016/j.ijplas.2011.08.001 ↗
24. Chapuis · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 198610.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.064 ↗
25. Jain · Mater Sci Eng · 2007 · A462 · 2910.1016/j.msea.2006.03.160 ↗
26. Brown · Int J Plast · 2012 · 29 · 12010.1016/j.ijplas.2011.08.006 ↗
27. Obara · Acta Metall · 1973 · 21 · 84510.1016/0001-6160(73)90141-7 ↗
28. Tonda · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33A · 83110.1007/s11661-002-0152-z ↗
29. Ando · J Jpn Light Metal · 1992 · 42 · 76510.2464/jilm.42.765 ↗
30. Numakura · Philos Mag A · 1990 · 62 · 52510.1080/01418619008244917 ↗
31. Li · Philos Mag · 2009 · 89 · 122310.1080/14786430902936707 ↗
32. Byer · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 53610.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.017 ↗
33. Li · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 17310.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.066 ↗
34. Gottstein · Mater Sci Forum · 2005 · 495–497 · 62310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.495-497.623 ↗
35. Sachs · Z Ver Dtsch Ing · 1928 · 72 · 734
36. Beyerlein · Int J Plast · 2008 · 24 · 86710.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.017 ↗
37. Oppedal · Int J Plast · 2012 · 30–31 · 4110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.09.002 ↗
38. Stanford · Int J Plast · 2013 · 47 · 16510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.012 ↗
39. Li · Metall Mater Trans A · 2008 · 39 · 260710.1007/s11661-008-9621-3 ↗
40. Lebensohn · Acta Mater · 1993 · 41 · 261110.1016/0956-7151(93)90130-K ↗
41. Proust · Int J Plast · 2009 · 25 · 86110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005 ↗
42. Groh · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/075009 ↗
43. Mayama · Int J Plast · 2011 · 27 · 191610.1016/j.ijplas.2011.02.007 ↗
44. Yi · J Alloys Compd · 2010 · 506 · 36410.1016/j.jallcom.2010.07.008 ↗
45. Zhu · Mater Trans A · 2009 · 40 · 242310.1007/s11661-009-9909-y ↗
46. Barnett · J Light Met · 2001 · 1 · 16710.1016/S1471-5317(01)00010-4 ↗
47. Koike · Mater Trans · 2003 · 44 · 4510.2320/matertrans.44.445 ↗
48. Watanabe · Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · A527 · 635010.1016/j.msea.2010.06.053 ↗
49. Tan · Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · A339 · 8110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00097-7 ↗
50. Del Valle · Metall Mater Trans · 2005 · 36A · 142710.1007/s11661-005-0235-8 ↗
51. Yi · Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · A424 · 27510.1016/j.msea.2006.03.022 ↗